The main objective of this study is to evaluate the biogas output from the anaerobic digestion of two different types of food waste: poultry waste and kitchen waste. REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES: The biodigester’s waste samples, which included both poultry and food scraps, were collected on the fourteenth day. Both sets of participants had their biogas levels measured with high-tech biogas metres. With a significance level of 0.05, a confidence interval of 95%, and a G power of 80%, the total sample size was determined to be 28. There were two groups, each with a sample size of 14. RESULTS: The biodigester was monitored for fourteen days to gather waste samples, which included both chicken and kitchen waste (N=14). When compared to kitchen garbage, the biodigester yielded much more biogas from poultry waste (12.56 m3) (20.19 m3). When compared to kitchen garbage, the results showed that poultry waste created far less biogas. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups, according to the independent sample t-test, which yielded a p value of 0.098. CONCLUSION: These results show that the biodigester powered by chicken waste can generate more biogas than the biodigester powered by kitchen trash.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
11 November 2024
2ND INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENERGY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND RENEWABLE ENERGY, ADVANCED MATERIALS, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: ICGRMSD24
1–2 February 2024
Thanjavur, India
Research Article|
November 11 2024
Comparison of biogas production from the anaerobic treatment of poultry waste with kitchen waste in biodigester
K. Pavithra;
K. Pavithra
1
Department of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University
, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
. Pincode: 602105
Search for other works by this author on:
Baranitharan Ethiraj
Baranitharan Ethiraj
a)
1
Department of Biotechnology, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University
, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
. Pincode: 602105a)Corresponding Author: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
a)Corresponding Author: [email protected]
AIP Conf. Proc. 3193, 020221 (2024)
Citation
K. Pavithra, Baranitharan Ethiraj; Comparison of biogas production from the anaerobic treatment of poultry waste with kitchen waste in biodigester. AIP Conf. Proc. 11 November 2024; 3193 (1): 020221. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0233215
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
10
Views
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
Related Content
Comparison of biogas production from the anaerobic treatment of kitchen waste with cow dung in biodigester
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2024)
Comparison of biogas production from the anaerobic treatment of paper waste with canteen waste in biodigester
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2024)
Comparison of biogas production from the anaerobic treatment of vegetable waste with cow dung in biodigester
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2024)
Application of the honeycomb anaerobic biodigester (honeycomb biodigester) in Tofu industrial wastewater treatment
AIP Conf. Proc. (July 2024)
Comparison of biogas production from the anaerobic treatment of water hyacinth with cow dung in biodigester
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2024)