The main objective of this study is to evaluate the biogas output from the anaerobic digestion of two different types of food waste: poultry waste and kitchen waste. REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES: The biodigester’s waste samples, which included both poultry and food scraps, were collected on the fourteenth day. Both sets of participants had their biogas levels measured with high-tech biogas metres. With a significance level of 0.05, a confidence interval of 95%, and a G power of 80%, the total sample size was determined to be 28. There were two groups, each with a sample size of 14. RESULTS: The biodigester was monitored for fourteen days to gather waste samples, which included both chicken and kitchen waste (N=14). When compared to kitchen garbage, the biodigester yielded much more biogas from poultry waste (12.56 m3) (20.19 m3). When compared to kitchen garbage, the results showed that poultry waste created far less biogas. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups, according to the independent sample t-test, which yielded a p value of 0.098. CONCLUSION: These results show that the biodigester powered by chicken waste can generate more biogas than the biodigester powered by kitchen trash.

1.
Ajay
,
C. M.
,
Sooraj
Mohan
, and
P.
Dinesha
.
2021
. “
Decentralized Energy from Portable Biogas Digesters Using Domestic Kitchen Waste: A Review
.”
Waste Management
125
(April):
10
26
.
2.
Angelakis
,
Andreas N.
, and
Joan B.
Rose
.
2014
.
Evolution of Sanitation and Wastewater Technologies through the Centuries
.
IWA Publishing
.
3.
Balagurusamy
,
Nagamani
, and
Anuj Kumar
Chandel
.
2021
.
Biogas Production: From Anaerobic Digestion to a Sustainable Bioenergy Industry
.
Springer Nature
.
4.
P.
Srinivasaperumal
and
V. L.
Sivakumar
, “
Geospatial Techniques for Quantitative Analysis of Urban Expansion and the Resulting Land Use Change along the Chennai Outer Ring Road (ORR) Corridor
,”
2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N)
, Dec.
2022
, doi: .
5.
P.
Srinivasaperumal
and
V. L.
Sivakumar
, “
Geospatial Techniques for Quantitative Analysis of Urban Expansion and the Resulting Land Use Change along the Chennai Outer Ring Road (ORR) Corridor
,”
2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N)
, Dec.
2022
, doi: .
6.
Beschkov
,
Venko
.
2022
. “
Biogas Production: Evaluation and Possible Applications
.”
Biogas - Basics, Integrated Approaches, and Case Studies.
.
7.
K.
Sharma
,
S.
Zahmatkesh
and
K.
Muthukumar
, “
A novel investigations on medical and non-medical mask performance with influence of marine waste microplastics (polypropylene
),”
Marine Pollution Bulletin
, vol.
192
, p.
115004
, Jul.
2023
, doi:
8.
Muthu
,
G
et al.,
2021
.
Experimental study of chemical composition of aluminium alloys
.
Materials Today: Proceedings
,
37
, pp.
1790
1793
.
9.
Chanakya
,
H. N.
,
Himanshu Kumar
Khuntia
,
Niranjan
Mukherjee
,
R.
Aniruddha
,
J. R.
Mudakavi
, and
Preeti
Thimmaraju
.
2015
. “
The Physicochemical Characteristics and Anaerobic Degradability of Desiccated Coconut Industry Waste Water
.”
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
187
(
12
):
772
.
10.
M.
Natarajan
et al., “
Optimization of wire spark erosion machining of Grade 9 titanium alloy (Grade 9) using a hybrid learning algorithm
,”
AIP Advances
, vol.
14
, no.
1
, Jan.
2024
, doi: .
11.
Vijayan
,
V.
,
Babu
,
A. K. A.
,
Balasubramanian
,
P. L.
, &
Jeganathan
,
M.
(Eds.). (
2022
, July).
Preface: ICMMNT21
. In
AIP Conference Proceedings
(Vol.
2473
, No.
1
, p.
010001
). AIP Publishing LLC.
12.
Comfort
,
Ibeawuchi
,
Utibe
Daniel
, and
Amadi Maxwell
Chibuike
.
2021
. “
Comparison of Biogas Production from Water Hyacinth and Poultry Waste
.”
International Journal of Innovative Research and Development.
.
13.
Vijayan
,
V.
,
Dinesh
,
S.
,
Parthiban
,
A.
, &
Srinivasan
,
R.
(Eds.). (
2021
, July).
International Virtual Conference on Recent Materials and Engineering Applications for Sustainable Environment (ICRMESE2020
). In
AIP Conference Proceedings
(Vol.
2378
, No.
1
, p.
010001
). AIP Publishing LLC.
14.
Deublein
,
Dieter
, and
Angelika
Steinhauser
.
2008
.
Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources: An Introduction
.
John Wiley & Sons
.
15.
Srinivasan
,
R.
,
Vijayan
,
V.
,
Babu
,
A. K. A.
,
Balasubramanian
,
P. L.
,
Jeganathan
,
M.
, &
Sathish
,
T.
(Eds.). (
2023
, November).
Preface–ICMSA21
. In
AIP Conference Proceedings
(Vol.
2822
, No.
1
, p.
010001
). AIP Publishing LLC.
16.
Gohil
,
Arka
,
Sejal
Budholiya
,
C. G.
Mohan
, and
R.
Prakash
.
2021
. “
Utilization of Poultry Waste as a Source of Biogas Production
.”
Materials Today: Proceedings.
.
17.
Kanhaiya
,
Krishnakant
, pursuing Department of Masters of Engineering in Structural Engineering, VNS Group of Institutions, Bhopal (M P),
India
., Ajay Kumar Jain, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Education, VNS Group of Institutions, Bhopal (M P), and India.
2022
. “‘A Comparative Study of Circular Water Tank in Two Different Loading Conditions (Seismic and Wind Load Condition) Using Staad-Pro.’”
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering.
.
18.
Gurukumaresan
,
D.
,
Duraisamy
,
C.
, &
Srinivasan
,
R.
(
2020
).
On Solving Transportation Problem in Fuzzy Environment Using Ranking Function
.
Gedrag Organ. Rev
,
33
(
02
),
1511
1520
.
19.
Muruganandam
,
S.
, &
Srinivasan
,
R.
(
2016
).
A method of solution to intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem
.
Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities
,
6
(
5
),
753
761
.
20.
Laskri
,
Nabila
,
Oualid
Hamdaoui
, and
Nawel
Nedjah
.
2015
. “
Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Organic Matter and Biogas Production
.”
Journal of Clean Energy Technologies.
.
21.
Leitão
,
R. C.
,
A. M.
Araújo
,
M. A.
Freitas-Neto
,
M. F.
Rosa
, and
S. T.
Santaella
.
2009
. “
Anaerobic Treatment of Coconut Husk Liquor for Biogas Production
.”
Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
59
(
9
):
1841
46
.
22.
Mohammed
,
Abdulhamid
,
Department of
Pure
and
Industrial Chemistry Umaru Musa Yaradua University Katsina
,
Muazu Batagarawa
Samaila
, and
Kamaludeen
Kabir
.
2020
. “Comparative Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion Using Sugarcane Bagasse, Cow Dung and Chicken Droppings Obtained from Katsina Metropolis as Substrates.”
UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR)
. .
23.
Muharja
,
Maktum
,
Dimas Khoirul
Umam
,
Dini
Pertiwi
,
Jayyid
Zuhdan
,
Tantular
Nurtono
, and
Arief
Widjaja
.
2019
. “
Enhancement of Sugar Production from Coconut Husk Based on the Impact of the Combination of Surfactant-Assisted Subcritical Water and Enzymatic Hydrolysis
.”
Bioresource Technology
274
(February):
89
96
.
24.
Rahman
,
Md Anisur
,
Razu
Shahazi
,
Syada Noureen Basher
Nova
,
M. Rakib
Uddin
,
Md Shahadat
Hossain
, and
Abu
Yousuf
.
2021
. “
Biogas Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion Using Kitchen Waste and Poultry Manure as Substrate—part 1: Substrate Ratio and Effect of Temperature
.”
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.
.
25.
Saba
,
Marium
,
Anum
Khan
,
Huma
Ali
,
Amna
Bibi
,
Zeeshan
Gul
,
Alam
Khan
,
Muhammad Maqsood Ur
Rehman
, et al.
2022
. “
Microbial Pretreatment of Chicken Feather and Its Co-Digestion With Rice Husk and Green Grocery Waste for Enhanced Biogas Production
.”
Frontiers in Microbiology
13
(April):
792426
.
26.
Wellinger
,
Arthur
,
Jerry D.
Murphy
, and
David
Baxter
.
2013
.
The Biogas Handbook: Science, Production and Applications
.
Elsevier
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.