Technology has become an integral part of our life and the demand for STEM-related jobs are increasing. This drives the need to encourage more students to pursue a STEM education. There are many researches focusing on identifying the factors that affect students’ success in Science and Mathematics ranging from students’ demographic, parents-related factors and socio-economic factors. However, there is lack of research focusing on how School-related and Teacher-related factors have an impact to students’ success in Science and Mathematics. With school being regarded as a second home for students, our research focus on investigating the School-related and Teacher-related factors that affect specifically East Asian students’ success in Science and Mathematics domains in the PISA study. Recursive feature elimination cross-validation (RFE-CV) can determine essential factors. These essential factors will serve as input into Random Forest and Decision Tree. Hamming scores are computed. The highest Hamming score is 0.8031 for Science and 0.7945 for Mathematics when Random Forest is used. This research study aims to provide reference to school management to create a better school experience to instill students’ interests in STEM.

1.
A.
VanMeter-Adams
,
C. L.
Frankenfeld
,
J.
Bases
,
V.
Espina
, and
L.A.
Liotta
, “
Students who demonstrate strong talent and interest in STEM are initially attracted to STEM through extracurricular experiences
,”
CBE— Life Sciences Education
,
13
(
4
),
687
697
(
2014
).
2.
İ.
Topsakal
,
S.S.
Yalçın
, S. A. and
Z.
Çakır
, “
The Effect of Problem-based STEM Education on the Students’ Critical Thinking Tendencies and Their Perceptions for Problem Solving Skills
,”
Science Education International
,
33
(
2
),
136
145
(
2022
).
3.
B.
Wahono
,
P.L.
Lin
, and
C.Y.
Chang
, “
Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes
,”
International Journal of STEM Education
,
7
,
1
18
(
2020
).
4.
OECD
,
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
, (
OECD Publishing
,
2019
).
5.
E.A.
Silver
, and
R.B.
Snider
, “
Using PISA to Stimulate STEM Teacher Professional Learning in the United States: The Case of Mathematics
,”
Issues in Teacher Education
,
23
(
1
),
11
30
(
2014
).
6.
OECD
, “
PISA 2018 Results: Combined Executive Summaries
,”
J Chem Inf Model.
,
53
(
9
),
1689
99
.
7.
O.
Lezhnina
and
G.
Kismihók
, “
Combining statistical and machine learning methods to explore German students’ attitudes towards ICT in PISA
,”
International journal of research & method in education
,
45
(
2
),
180
199
(
2022
).
8.
Ö. B.
Güre
,
M.
Kayri
, and
F.
Erdoğan
, “
Analysis of Factors Effecting PISA 2015 Mathematics Literacy via Educational Data Mining
,”
Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim
,
45
(
202
), (
2020
).
9.
M.
Simsek
, “
Predicting Mathematics Performance by ICT Variables in PISA 2018 through Decision Tree Algorithm
,”
International Journal of Technology in Education
,
5
(
2
),
269
279
(
2022
).
10.
A.
Bozak
, and
E. C.
Aybek
, “
Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression Analysis in PISA Science Literacy Success Prediction
,”
International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research
,
7
(
2
),
99
111
(
2020
).
11.
E. G.
Bayirli
,
A.
Kaygun
, and
E.
Öz
, “
An Analysis of PISA 2018 Mathematics Assessment for Asia-Pacific Countries Using Educational Data Mining
,”
Mathematics
,
11
(
6
),
1318
(
2023
).
12.
H.
Lee
, and
J. W.
Lee
, “
Why East Asian students perform better in mathematics than their peers: An investigation using a machine learning approach
,” (
2021
).
13.
K.C.
Lau
, and
S. C. E.
Ho
, “
Attitudes towards science, teaching practices, and science performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel analysis of the Chinese and Western top performers
,”
Research in Science Education
,
1
12
(
2020
).
14.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.