This research started with the fact that students have low mathematical argumentation skills when solving contextual problems. Since fraction learning focuses on memorizing fraction operation rules and procedures, the argumentation ability is hampered. Students should be taught what fractions are first so that they can explain how to solve fractions. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of lemang context in fraction material in building students’ argumentation ability. The study also produced a hypothetical learning trajectory on fractions through the use of lemang context. This study conducted a validation study type design research. The design research stages described in this study only reached the pilot experiment stage (cycle 1). The subjects in this study used two classes in one of the schools in Muara Enim. Pretest, observation, interview, and documentation were the data collection methods in this study. The hypothetical learning trajectory produced by this study consisted of two activities. The designed activities started with measuring materials to make lemang and using the right canting to measure fractions. The retrospective analysis results of the pilot experiment showed that using the context of lemang can improve the argumentation skills of elementary school students. The results showed that groups 1 and 2 could demonstrate the argumentation elements of data, claim, warrant, and backing.

1.
T.
Kar
,
G.
Güler
,
C.
Şen
, and
E.
Özdemir
,
Int J Math Educ Sci Technol
49
(
2
),
200
226
(
2018
).
2.
S.A.
Saskiyah
, and
R.I.I.
Putri
, in
J Phys Conf Ser
(
IOP Publishing Ltd
,
2020
).
3.
J.A.
Van De Walle
,
K.S.
Karp
, and
J.M.
Bay-William
,
Elementary and Secondary School Mathematics: Teaching with Developmental Approach (S. Durmuş, Trans.)
(
Nobel Academic Publishing
,
Ankara
,
2012
).
4.
Y.M.
Alghazo
, and
R.
Alghazo
,
International Education Studies
10
(
4
),
133
(
2017
).
5.
A.
Roche
, and
D.M.
Clarke
,
Mathematics Education Research Journal
25
(
2
),
257
278
(
2013
).
6.
Y.W.
Purnomo
, Pasri,
T.A.
Aziz
,
M.
Shahrill
, and
I.W.
Prananto
,
Journal on Mathematics Education
13
(
4
),
681
702
(
2022
).
7.
S.
Erduran
,
S.
Simon
, and
J.
Osborne
,
Sci Educ
88
(
6
),
915
933
(
2004
).
8.
P.J.
Lin
,
Educacao and Realidade
43
(
3
),
1171
1192
(
2018
).
9.
N.U.
Sholihah
,
L.U.
Sadieda
, and
S.
Sutini
,
JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika)
6
(
1
),
24
38
(
2021
).
10.
C.A.
Rodríguez-Nieto
,
J.A.
Cervantes-Barraza
, and
V.F.
Moll
,
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
19
(
5
), (
2023
).
11.
H.S.
Solar
, and
J.
Deulofeu
,
Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática
30
(
56
),
1092
1112
(
2016
).
12.
T.I.
Sari
,
N.
Aisyah
, and
C.
Hiltrimartin
,
Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika)
4
(
1
),
45
55
(
2022
).
13.
A.
Wijaya
, Elmaini, and
M.
Doorman
,
Journal on Mathematics Education
12
(
1
),
1
16
(
2021
).
14.
K.P.E.
Gravemeijer
,
Developing Realistic Mathematics Education
(
CD-ß Press /
Freudenthal Institute
,
1994
).
15.
A.
Liu
, and
U.
Timor
, “
Hipotesis Lintasan Belajar Matematika Siswa Dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri Maubeli Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020
,” (n.d.).
16.
P.
Prihantini
,
D.
Rostika
, and
N.
Hidayah
, in
J Phys Conf Ser
(
IOP Publishing Ltd
,
2021
).
17.
R.
Prastiwi
, and
B.A.
Saputro
,
Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Operasi Hitung Perkalian Dan Pembagian Pecahan Kelas V SD
(
Potlot Publisher
,
Semarang
,
2023
).
18.
M.
Fidayanti
,
A.
Shodiqin
,
S.
Yp
, J,
Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies
3
(
1
), (
2020
).
19.
F.
Reuter
,
Educational Studies in Mathematics
112
(
3
),
415
435
(
2023
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.