In the dynamic landscape of home automation, the evolution of robotic vacuum cleaners, particularly the Roomba, stands as a testament to significant technological strides. This paper delves into the transformative journey from basic dustpans to sophisticated robotic vacuums, underlining the pivotal role of advanced navigation technologies, primarily LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and VSLAM (Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping). Commence by tracing the historical context of these technologies, underscoring their initial applications and developmental milestones. The progression from early Roomba models, reliant on rudimentary navigation systems, to contemporary iterations equipped with LiDAR and VSLAM, reveals a paradigm shift in autonomous cleaning efficiency and precision. I will explore the intricacies of LiDAR and VSLAM, examining their unique attributes and the challenges they present. While LiDAR excels in precision mapping and is unaffected by lighting conditions, it carries implications of higher costs and potential mechanical wear. Conversely, VSLAM, leveraging visual data for navigation, offers economic and hardware simplicity but faces challenges in variable lighting conditions and raises privacy concerns. The paper presents detailed case studies of Roomba models, illustrating the practical implementation and user experience enhancements brought about by these technologies. The future of Roomba’s navigation systems is also contemplated, focusing on prospects like sensor fusion, AI integration, enhanced privacy safeguards, and the implications of cost reduction strategies. This comprehensive exploration aims to provide a holistic understanding of the impact of LiDAR and VSLAM on the evolution of Roomba vacuums, reflecting a broader narrative of technological advancement in household appliances.

1.
T.
Takafumi
,
H.
Uchiyama
, and
S.
Ikeda
. "
Visual SLAM algorithms: A survey from 2010 to 2016
."
IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications
9
, no.
1
(
2017
):
1
11
.
2.
K.
Niklas
,
E.
Bernardo
,
J.
Ostrowski
,
L.
Goncalves
,
P.
Pirjanian
, and
M.
Munich
. "
The vSLAM algorithm for robust localization and mapping
."
In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation
, pp.
24
29
.
IEEE
, 2005.
3.
S.
Shinya
,
M.
Shibuya
, and
K.
Sakurada
. "
OpenVSLAM: A versatile visual SLAM framework
."
In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
, pp.
2292
2295
.
2019
.
4.
Z.
Yipu
, and
P.
Vela
. "
Good feature matching: Toward accurate, robust vo/vslam with low latency
."
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
36
, no.
3
(
2020
):
657
675
.
5.
M.
Alexey
, and
S.
Macenski
. "
A comparison of modern general-purpose visual SLAM approaches
."
In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS
), pp.
9190
9197
.
IEEE
,
2021
.
6.
L.
Henning
,
A.
Geiger
, and
B.
Kitt
. "
Visual SLAM for autonomous ground vehicles
."
In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, pp.
1732
1737
.
IEEE
,
2011
.
7.
Z.
Danpinh
and
P.
Tan
. "
Coslam: Collaborative visual slam in dynamic environments
."
IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
35
, no.
2
(
2012
):
354
366
.
8.
Z.
Yipu
, and
P.
Vela
. "
Good feature selection for least squares pose optimization in VO/VSLAM
."
In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS
), pp.
1183
1189
.
IEEE
,
2018
.
9.
Zhao
,
Yipu
, and
Patricio A.
Vela
. "
Good feature selection for least squares pose optimization in VO/VSLAM
."
In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS
), pp.
1183
1189
.
IEEE
,
2018
.
10.
R.
Dinesh
,
P.
Chari
, and
K.
Krishna
. "
Dynamic body vslam with semantic constraints
."
In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS
), pp.
1897
1904
.
IEEE
,
2015
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.