This research aims to analyze the pre-test and post-test results after being given gradual test instruments to students. The method used in this research is a mixed method, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, namely the Concurrent Embedded Strategy, which is a combination of qualitative methods and quantitative methods carried out simultaneously. The instrument used is a worksheet that was developed based on the representation-metacognitive reinforcement conceptual change model (R-MR CCM). Four students experienced misconceptions during the pre-test and, after being given a gradual test instrument, were able to reduce the misconceptions to appropriate conceptions. There was one student who experienced misconceptions during the pre-test and, after being given the gradual test instrument, still experienced misconceptions, and There was one student who had an appropriate conception during the pre-test but experienced misconceptions during the post-test. Based on the number of pre-test and post-test results, the gradual test instrument is still stated to reduce misconceptions, but educators also have an important role in directing students so that they do not experience misconceptions when working on the test instrument.

1.
M. A. O.
Ruiz
,
L. V.
Osuna
,
B. V.
Salas
,
M. S.
Wienner
,
J. S.
Garcia
,
E. C.
Cordova
,
R.
Nedev
and
R.
Ibarra
,
Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc.
34
(
3-4
),
87
93
(
2014
).
2.
I.
Landa
,
H.
Westbroek
,
F.
Janssen
,
J.
van Muijlwijk
and
M.
Meeter
,
Sci. Educ.
29
,
1361
1388
(
2020
).
3.
A.
Juniar
and
I. A.
Sianipar
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia
(
Journal of Chemistry Education)
.
14
(
2
),
79
84
(
2022
).
4.
K. S.
Taber
.
The Nature of the Chemical Concept: Re-constructing Chemical Knowledge in Teaching and Learning
(
Royal Society of Chemistry
,
Cambridge
,
2019
).
5.
I.
Helsy
and
L.
Andriyani
,
Jurnal Tadris Kimiya
(
Journal of Chemistry Teaching)
.
2
(
1
),
104
108
(
2017
).
6.
A. R.
Brandriet
and
S. L.
Bretz
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
15
,
729
746
(
2014
).
7.
I. A.
Kusumaningrum
,
Ashadi
and
N. Y.
Indriyanti
,
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
1022
,
012036
.
8.
R. M.
Garcia-Lopera
,
M. L.
Catalayud
and
J.
Hernández
,
AJEEL.
2
(
6
),
448
463
(
2014
).
9.
A. D. P
Rahayu
and
H.
Nasrudi
,
UJCEd.
3
(
2
),
88
98
(
2014
).
10.
I. W.
Suja
,
I. K.
Sudiana
,
W.
Redhana
and
I. B. N.
Sudria
,
IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.
1115
,
012064
(
2021
).
11.
B.
Yakmaci-Guzel
and
E.
Adadan
,
IJESE.
8
(
1
),
109
130
(
2013
).
12.
R.
Chang
.
General Chemistry: The Essential Concepts—14th Edition
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
2022
).
13.
D.
Novita
,
Suyono
and
L.
Yuanita
, “Dynamic Equilibrium: The Conception of a Prospective Chemistry Teacher,” in
Advances in Engineering Research 209, IJCSE Proceeding 2021
, edited by
B.
Setiawan
et al (
Atlantis Press, Dordrecht
,
The Netherlands
,
2021
), pp.
179
184
.
14.
H. D
Barke
,
A.
Hazari
and
S.
Yitbarek
,
Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education
(
Springer
,
New York
,
2009
).
15.
M.
Ghirardi
,
F.
Marchetti
,
C.
Pettinari
,
A.
Regis
and
E.
Roletto
,
J. Chem. Educ.
91
(
1
),
59
65
(
2014
).
16.
M.
Louisa
,
F. C. S.
Veiga
,
D. J. V. C.
Pereira
and
R.
Maskill
,
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
11
(
4
),
465
479
(
1989
).
17.
K.
Ganaras
,
A.
Dumon
and
C.
Larcher
,
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
9
,
240
249
(
2008
).
18.
M. B.
Nakhleh
,
J. Chem. Educ.
69
(
3
),
191
196
(
1992
).
19.
A. C.
Banerjee
,
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
13
(
4
),
487
494
(
1991
).
20.
H.
Modell
,
J.
Michael
and
M. P.
Wenderoth
,
Am. Biol. Teach.
67
(
1
),
20
26
(
2005
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.