The purpose of this study was to evaluate the readiness of science teachers in West Lombok Regency Indonesia to apply the Merdeka Curriculum and to describe their experiences in implementing learning oriented to the development of process skills and scientific literacy in the classroom. This research was carried out using an ex post facto approach. This study involved 24 science teachers and 256 students consisting of 93 seventh-grade students, 108 eighth-grade students, and 64 ninth-grade students as respondents spread across 10 State Junior High Schools in West Lombok Regency in the academic year 2021-2022 which was collected by using a proportional random sampling. The data were obtained using three questionnaires, namely a questionnaire on teacher readiness to apply Independent Learning, distributed to teachers, a questionnaire on the application of Science Process Skills learning, and a questionnaire on the application of scientific literacy learning, each distributed to both teachers and students. Data were analysed descriptively with percentage and correlation techniques. The results showed that the readiness of junior high school science teachers in West Lombok Regency to apply the Merdeka curriculum was in the fair category, with an average score of 50.08. Science teachers who have participated in the Guru Penggerak program have better readiness, with an average score of 66.68, than those who have not, with an average score of 46.28. The teachers considered that they had a good experience on implemented the science process skills learning, while the students considered it fair, with an average score of 73.33 and 59.26, respectively. The teachers’ responses to how well they had applied scientific literacy learning in the classroom were higher than the students, with an average score of 65.88 and 60.97 in the good category, respectively. It seems that the teacher’s experience in applying science process skills and scientific literacy learning plays a role in the teacher’s readiness to apply the Merdeka curriculum. The results of this study are the basis for recommendations on the need for training for science teachers in junior high schools to accelerate the implementation of an independent curriculum through learning oriented towards developing science process skills and science literacy to realise the Pancasila Students Profile.

1.
Sadewa
M.A.
Reviewing the prototype curriculum through Prof
.
M Amin Abdullah’s integration-interconnection approach (Meninjau Kurikulum Prototipe Melalui Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi Prof M Amin Abdullah). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling.
2022
;
4
(
1
):
266
80
.
2.
Zamjani
I
, et al.
Academic Paper of the Sekolah Penggerak Program (Naskah Akademik Program Sekolah Penggerak)
.
2020
.
71
p.
3.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia (Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI)
.
Sekolah Penggerak Guide for Assessors (Panduan Sekolah Penggerak untuk Asesor)
.
2021
.
31
p.
4.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia (Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI)
.
List of Frequently Asked Questions
Sekolah Penggerak Program (Daftar Pertanyaan yang Sering Ditanyakan Program Sekolah Penggerak (PSP))
.
2021
.
23
p.
5.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia (Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI)
.
Education Guide of Guru Penggerak (Panduan Pendidikan Guru Penggerak)
.
2020
.
90
p.
6.
Yustina
,
Syafii
W
,
Vebrianto
R.
The Effects of Blended Learning and Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Creative Thinking Skills through Online Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic
.
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia.
2020
;
9
(
3
):
408
20
.
7.
Khery
Y
,
Nufida
B.A.
,
Rahayu
S.
Identification of Science Literacy Competency of Chemistry Teacher Candidate.
2020
;
8
(
1
):
50
5
.
8.
Widowati
A
,
Anjarsari
P
,
Zuhdan
K.P.
,
Dita
A.
Applying innovative approach “nature of Science (NoS) within inquiry” for developing scientific literacy in the student worksheet
.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
2018
;
983
(
1
).
9.
Mark
,
Hofstein
A
,
Eilks
I
,
Bybee
R.
Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education
.
Contemporary science education.
2011
;(
September 2010
):
5
22
.
10.
Hodson
D.
In
Pursuit of Scientific Literacy
.
Towards Scientific Literacy.
2019
.
1
22 p
.
11.
Suryati
S
,
Khery
Y
,
Dewi
C.A.
Development Strategy of Inquiry-Based Mobile Learning in General Chemistry Classroom.
2017
;(
Aes
):
439
43
.
12.
Dolin
J
,
Evans
R
,
Quistgaard
N.
Teaching and Learning Scientific Literacy and Citizenship in Partnership with Schools and Science Museums Introduzione
.
Lifelog Learning Programme.
2010
;
1
30
.
13.
Laugksch
R.C.
Scientific Literacy : A Conceptual Overview
.
Science Education.
2000
;
84
(
1
):
71
94
.
14.
Arokoyu
A.A.
,
Harcourt
P.
Improving Scientific Literacy among Secondary School Students through Integration of Information and Communication Technology
.
2012
;
2
(
5
):
444
8
.
15.
Holbrook
J
,
Rannikmae
M.
The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy
.
International Journal of Science Education.
2007
;
29
(
11
):
1347
62
.
16.
Utami
B
,
Saputro
S
,
Ashadi
,
Masykuri
M.
Scientific literacy in science lesson
.
Prosiding ICTTE FKIP UNS
2015. 2016
;
1
(
1
):
125
33
.
17.
Khery
Y
,
Nufida
B.A.
,
Rahayu
S
,
Budiasih
E.
Do understanding the nature of science ( nos ) play a role in students’ understanding of chemistry concepts and science process skills?
In:
International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education
.
2019
. p.
169
77
.
18.
Vebrianto
R.
Fostering Science Process Skills and Improving Achievement Through the Use of.
2005
;
191
204
.
19.
Ango
M.L.
Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context
.
International Journal of Educology.
2002
;
16
(
1
):
11
30
.
20.
Nurulwati
,
Herliana
F
,
Elisa
,
Musdar
.
The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning to Increase Science Process Skills in Static Fluids Topic
.
AIP Conference Proceedings.
2021
;
2320
(
March
).
21.
Rakhmawan
A
,
Setiabudi
A
,
Mudzakir
,
Ahmad
.
Perancangan Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Berbasis Inkuiri
.
JPPI Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA.
2015
;
1
(
1
):
143
52
.
22.
Nufida
B.A.
,
Khery
Y
,
Rahayu
S
,
Budiasih
E.
Correlation amongst understanding of NOS, conceptual understanding, and science process skill of undergraduate students on general chemistry Correlation Amongst Understanding of NOS, Conceptual Understanding, and Science Process Skill of Undergraduate.
2020
;
030024
(
April
).
23.
Rubini
B
,
Ardianto
D
,
Pursitasari
I.D.
,
Permana
I.
Identify Scientific Literacy from The Science Teachers Perspective
.
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia.
2016
;
5
(
2
):
299
303
.
24.
Kepmenpendikbudristek
.
Guidelines for curriculum implementation in the context of learning recovery (Pedoman penerapan kurikulum dalam rangka pemulihan pembelajaran
). In:
Kepmenpendikbudristek.
2022
. p.
1
112
.
25.
Sadewa
M.A.
Reviewing the prototype curriculum through Prof
.
M Amin Abdullah’s integration-interconnection approach (Meninjau Kurikulum Prototipe Melalui Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi Prof M Amin Abdullah). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling.
2022
;
4
(
1
):
266
80
.
26.
Ango
M.L.
Mastery of Science Process Skills and Their Effective Use in the Teaching of Science: An Educology of Science Education in the Nigerian Context
.
International Journal of Educology.
2002
;
16
(
1
):
11
30
.
27.
Karaarslan
G
,
Teksöz
G.
Integrating Sustainable Development Concept into Science Education Program is not enough; We Need Competent Science Teachers for Education for Sustainable Development – Turkish Experience
.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education.
2016
;
11
(
15
):
8403
24
.
28.
Wartono
W
,
Takaria
J
,
Batlolona
J.R.
,
Grusche
S
,
Hudha
M.N.
,
Jayanti
Y.M.
Inquiry-Discovery Empowering High Order Thinking Skills and Scientific Literacy on Substance Pressure Topic
.
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni.
2018
;
7
(
2
):
139
51
.
29.
Rakhmawan
A
,
Setiabudi
A
,
Mudzakir
,
Ahmad
.
Inquiry-Based Science Literacy Learning Design (Perancangan Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Berbasis Inkuiri
).
JPPI Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA.
2015
;
1
(
1
):
143
52
.
30.
Wildan
W
,
Hakim
A
,
Siahaan
J
,
Anwar
Y.A.S.
A stepwise inquiry approach to improving communication skills and scientific attitudes on a biochemistry course
.
International Journal of Instruction.
2019
;
12
(
4
):
407
22
.
31.
Rahayu
S.
Mengoptimalkan Aspek Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Abad
21
.
2019
;(
March
).
32.
Wicaksono
R
,
Susilo
H
,
Sueb
.
Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Combined With Think Pair Share In Enhancing Students ’ Scientific Literacy and Communication Skill Through Teaching Biology in English Course Peerteaching Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Combined With Thin
.
Journal of Physics: COnf Series.
2019
;
1227
(
01205
).
33.
Deboer
G.E.
Scienti ® c Literacy : Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform
.
2000
;
37
(
6
):
582
601
.
34.
Arokoyu
A.A.
,
Harcourt
P.
Improving Scientific Literacy among Secondary School Students through Integration of Information and Communication Technology.
2012
;
2
(
5
):
444
8
.
35.
OECD
.
How does the PISA for Development measure scientific literacy?
PISA for Development Brief 10.
2017
;
I
(
February 2014
):
1
2
.
36.
Harosid
H.
Curriculum 2013 Revised 2017 (Kurikulum 2013 Revisi 2017)
.
2017
;
37.
OECD
.
PISA 2021 Integrated Design. In: PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework
.
Paris
:
OECD Publishing
;
2021
. p.
3
26
.
38.
OECD
.
PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy, PISA
.
Paris
:
OECD Publishin
;
2016
.
39.
Rahayu
S.
Optimizing Literacy Aspects in 21st Century Chemistry Learning
(
Mengoptimalkan Aspek Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Abad 21
).
2019
;(March).
40.
Avvisati
F
,
Echazarra
A
,
Givord
P
,
Schwabe
M.
Country Note Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): Result from PISA 2018
. In:
OECD 2019 Vol I-III.
2019
. p.
79
79
.
41.
OECD
.
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework.
2019
.
42.
Rahmania
L.A.
Optimization of School Literacy Movement in Preparation for National Assessment (Optimalisasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah dalam Persiapan Asesmen Nasional)
.
2021
;
1
(
4
):
450
61
.
43.
Inovasi and Center for Education and Cultural Policy Research, Research and Development Agency KP and K (Inovasi dan Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan KP dan K). Basic Literacy: Building the Foundation of Student Learning. and Center for Education and Cultural Policy Research, Research and Development Agency (Literasi Dasar: Membangun Fondasi Belajar Siswa. dan Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan), Ministry of Education and Culture (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan);
2019
. p.
19
22
.
44.
Nur’aini
F
,
Ulumuddin
I
,
Sari
L.S.
,
Fujianita
S.
Improving the Basic Literacy Skills of Indonesian Students Based on PISA 2018 Data Analysis (Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Dasar Siswa Indonesia Berdasarkan Analisis Data PISA 2018
).
Risalah Kebijakan.
2021
;April
2021
(
3
):
1
8
.
45.
Inovasi
.
Collaboration between the Center for Education and Cultural Policy Research and INOVASI: Preparation of Eight Policy Treatises for Improving Basic Literacy in Early Grades [Internet]. (Kerjasama Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dan INOVASI: Penyusunan Delapan Naskah Risalah Kebijakan untuk Peningkatan Literasi Dasar di Kelas Awal [Internet]
).
Center for Education Standards and Policy, Education Curriculum and Assessment Standards Agency, Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia (Pusat Standar dan Kebijakan Pendidikan, Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI)
.
2019
. Available from: https://pskp.kemdikbud.go.id/berita/detail/3238/kerjasama-pusat-penelitian-kebijakan-pendidikan-dan-kebudayaan-dan-inovasi-penyusunan-delapan-naskah-risalah-kebijakan-untuk-peningkatan-literasi-dasar-di-kelas-awal
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.