The paper presents a study of students’ interest in science and the identification of interesting topics not covered in physics classes. 136 8th and 9th grade students from a particular primary school in Slovenia participated in the survey. The results show that primary school students find it interesting to learn about contemporary physics. Gender and interest in science influence students’ choices of what topics they find interesting and their responses to lessons on the selected most interesting topic in physics. Specifically, of the seven proposed topics briefly presented to the students (radioactivity, liquid crystals, physics in medicine, astronomy, energy sources, technical devices, and hydrogels), radioactivity proved to be the most interesting. Most students would like to learn more about the findings of contemporary physics, while one in three students would like to take an elective. For female students, physics in medicine ranked first in interest, while for male students, radioactivity ranked first. Students found school lessons on radioactivity interesting. The results indicate that students want to learn about the content of contemporary physics and that such topics are more attractive to them than the content of regular physics classes, which is also shown in the evaluation of the most popular topic, radioactivity. The research indirectly appeals to teachers to include contemporary physics topics in physics classes.

1.
R.
Repnik
, “
Uspešnost tradicionalnih učnih method pri vnašanju sodobnih znanstvenih dognanj v osnovnošolski pouk fizike [The effectiveness of traditional teaching methods in introducing contemporary scientific findings into primary school physics lessons]
,” Ph.D. thesis,
University of Maribor
,
2012
.
2.
M.
Cvetko
,
I.
Gerlič
,
M.
Milfelner
,
R.
Repnik
, and
M.
Ambrožič
, “Priljubljenost fizike v osnovni in srednji šoli [The popularity of physics in primary and secondary schools],” in
Opredelitev naravoslovnih kompetenc: znanstvena monografija [Definition of natural science competences: scientific monograph]
, edited by
V.
Grubelnik
(
University of Maribor, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
,
2010
), pp.
109
121
.
3.
N.
Zabukovšek
, “
Študija priljubljenosti fizike in vključevanja dijakov in hijacking k puku predmeta v povezavi z biro in uspešnostjo reševanja treh tipov nalog [A study of the popularity of physics and the inclusion of male and female students in the subject’s lessons in connection with the choice and success of solving three types of tasks]
,“ Msc. Thesis,
University of Ljubljana
,
2016
.
4.
R. M.
Guido
,
Int. J. Eng. Res. & Techn.
2
(
11
)
2087
2093
(
2013
).
5.
M. K.
Sarabi
and
K.
Gafoor
,
Innovations and Researches in Education
8
(
1
),
42
55
(
2018
).
6.
M.
Juriševič
,
Motiviranje učencev v šoli [Motivating students at school]
(
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education
,
2012
).
7.
J.
Lavonen
et al,
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
43
(
16
),
2577
2596
(
2021
).
8.
S.
Sjøberg
and
C.
Schreiner
,
The ROSE project. An overview and key findings
(
University of Oslo
,
2010
).
9.
G.
Tural
,
Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching
14
(
1
),
1
23
(
2013
).
10.
M.
Čepič
, “Introduction of current scientific results to education: experiences from the case of liquid crystals,” in
Key competencies in physics teaching and learning: selected contributions from the International Conference GIREP EPEC 2015, Wrocław Poland, 6-10 July 2015
, edited by
T.
Greczyło
and
E.
Dębowska
, (
Springer
,
2017
, page number), pp.
41
54
.
11.
P.
Shabajee
and
K.
Postlethwaite
,
Sch. Sci. Rev.
81
(
297
),
51
56
(
2000
).
12.
C.
Fazio
et al, “Crossing disciplinary knowledge boundaries and bridging the gap between science education research, educational practices, society and citizens: inquiry-based learning and responsible research and innovation,” in
The beauty and pleasure of understanding: Engaging with contemporary challenges through science education
, (
Bologna
,
University of Bologna
,
2020
), pp.
66
77
.
13.
J.
Pavlin
et al, “Introduction of contemporary physics to pre-university education,” in
Teaching-learning contemporary physics: from research to practice
, edited by
B.
Jarosievitz
and
C.
Sükösd
, (
Springer
,
2021
, page number), pp.
71
90
.
14.
J.
Pavlin
,
N.
Vaupotič
, and
M.
Čepič
,
Eur. J. Phys.
34
(
3
),
745
761
(
2013
).
15.
J.
Pavlin
and
M.
Čepič
, “Hydrogels in the classroom,” in
Key competencies in physics teaching and learning: selected contributions from the International Conference GIREP EPEC 2015, Wrocław Poland, 6-10 July 2015
, edited by
T.
Greczyło
and
E.
Dębowska
, (
Springer
,
2017
, page number), pp.
191
201
.
16.
P.
Kácovský
,
V.
Koudelková
, and
M.
Snetinova
,
Scientia in Educatione
10
(
3
),
33
49
(
2019
).
17.
J. T. E.
Richardson
,
Edu. Res. Rev.
6
(
2
),
135
147
(
2011
).
18.
J.
Pallant
,
SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS
. Fourth Edition (
Allen and Unwin
,
Australia
,
2011
).
19.
A.
Wirth
and
J.
Pavlin
, “
Vpeljava radioaktivnosti v osnovnošolski pouk fizike [Introduction of radioactivity in elementary school physics lessons]
,” in
The Book of Papers of the Conference EDUvision 2021
, pp.
360
370
. Available: http://www.eduvision.si/Content/Docs/The_Book_of_Papers_EDUvision_2021.pdf
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.