This study aims to analyze the shape of the speed line, flow trajectory, resistance, and coefficient of resistance received by the skateboard. The aerodynamic flow testing method on a skateboard is carried out using the flow simulation available on Solidworks. The model of the skateboard made there are 2 variations. Model 1 on the front and back form the same angle of 30o and model 2 on the front flat and back forms an angle of 30o. The results of the study showed that the shape of the skateboard model 2 has a smoother flow pattern on the top of the board than the type of skateboard shape model 1 which produces a backflow rotation on the top of the board. And supported by the results of the comparison of model 1 and model 2, the highest value is taken in each model with a speed of 35 m/s with a density of 1.225 kg/m^3 then the resistance value in model 1 is 10.94169313 N and the coefficient of resistance is 10.94169313 N. the resistance is 9.06215e -07 and while in model 2 the resistance value is 6.642596152 N and the coefficient of inhibition is 7.11141e-07.

1.
Maciej
Serda
,
F. G.
Becker
,
M.
Cleary
,
R. M.
Team
,
H.
Holtermann
,
D.
The
,
N.
Agenda
,
P.
Science
,
S. K.
Sk
,
R.
Hinnebusch
,
R.
Hinnebusch
A,
I.
Rabinovich
,
Y.
Olmert
,
D. Q. G. L. Q.
Uld
,
W. K. H. U.
Ri
,
V.
Lq
,
W. K. H.
Frxqwu
,
E.
Zklfk
,
L. V
Edvhg
,
R. Q.
Wkh
,
F. G.
Becker
,
N.
Aboueldahab
,
R.
Khalaf
,
L. R.
De Elvira
,
T.
Zintl
,
R.
Hinnebusch
,
M.
Karimi
,
S. M. Mousavi
Shafaee
,
D. O
’driscoll
,
S.
Watts
,
J.
Kavanagh
,
B.
Frederick
,
T.
Norlen
,
A.
O’Mahony
,
P.
Voorhies
,
T.
Szayna
,
N.
Spalding
,
M. O.
Jackson
,
M.
Morelli
,
B.
Satpathy
,
B.
Muniapan
,
M.
Dass
,
P.
Katsamunska
,
Y.
Pamuk
,
A.
Stahn
,
E.
Commission
,
T. E. D.
Piccone
,
M. K.
Annan
,
S.
Djankov
,
M.
Reynal-Querol
,
M.
Couttenier
,
R.
Soubeyran
,
P.
Vym
,
E.
Prague
,
World
Bank
,
C.
Bodea
,
N.
Sambanis
,
A.
Florea
,
A.
Florea
,
M.
Karimi
,
S. M. Mousavi
Shafaee
,
N.
Spalding
,
N.
Sambanis
, and فاطمی.ح,
J. Tek. MESIN
5
,
50
(
2017
)
2.
L.
Prabhu
,
S.
Krishnamoorthi
,
P.
Gokul
,
N.
Sushan
,
P. H. Hisham
Harshed
, and
A.
Jose
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
993
,
012002
(
2020
)
3.
Asral,
Kaspul
Anuar
, and
Agung
Soegihin
,
J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci.
93
,
83
(
2022
)
4.
M. N.
Sudin
,
M. A.
Abdullah
,
S. A.
Shamsuddin
,
F. R.
Ramli
, and
M. M.
Tahir
,
Int. J. Mech. Mechatronics Eng.
14
,
35
(
2014
)
5.
N.
Chen
,
Y.
Li
,
B.
Wang
,
Y.
Su
, and
H.
Xiang
,
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
143
,
113
(
2015
)
6.
T. M.
Barbosa
,
P.
Forte
,
J. E.
Estrela
, and
E.
Coelho
,
Procedia Eng.
147
,
2
(
2016
)
7.
M.
Yani
and
B.
Suroso
,
J.
Rekayasa
Mater. Manufaktur Dan Energi
2
,
150
(
2019
)
8.
A.
Muniroh
and
M. N.
Amin
,
Engagem. J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy.
4
,
116
(
2020
)
9.
M.
Graf
,
S.
Härtel
,
C.
Binotsch
, and
B.
Awiszus
,
Procedia Eng.
184
,
497
(
2017
)
10.
S.
Lubis
,
C. A.
Siregar
, and
F.
Abdilah
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
821
,
012047
(
2020
)
11.
B.
Blocken
,
T.
Defraeye
,
E.
Koninckx
,
J.
Carmeliet
, and
P.
Hespel
,
Comput. Fluids
71
,
435
(
2013
)
12.
M.
Aultman
,
Z.
Wang
,
R.
Auza-Gutierrez
, and
L.
Duan
,
Comput. Fluids
236
,
105297
(
2022
)
13.
J.
Sahu
and
K. R.
Heavey
,
Comput. Fluids
88
,
678
(
2013
)
16.
M. D.
Iqbal
,
C.
Birk
,
E. T.
Ooi
, and
H.
Gravenkamp
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
387
,
114106
(
2021
)
17.
N.
Peres
,
R.
Gonçalves
, and
D.
Camotim
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
381
,
113804
(
2021
)
18.
C.
Lee
,
S.
Kim
, and
P.-S.
Lee
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
373
,
113481
(
2021
)
19.
O.
Barfusz
,
T.
van der Velden
,
T.
Brepols
,
H.
Holthusen
, and
S.
Reese
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
382
,
113884
(
2021
)
20.
M. A.
Sánchez
,
B.
Cockburn
,
N.-C.
Nguyen
, and
J.
Peraire
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
381
,
113843
(
2021
)
21.
S. L.
Fuchs
,
C.
Meier
,
W. A.
Wall
, and
C. J.
Cyron
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
383
,
113922
(
2021
)
22.
D.
Wan
and
S.
Turek
,
J. Comput. Appl. Math.
203
,
561
(
2007
)
23.
P.
O’Hara
,
C. A.
Duarte
, and
T.
Eason
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
198
,
1857
(
2009
)
24.
C.
Yan
,
Y.
Zheng
,
D.
Huang
, and
G.
Wang
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
375
,
113587
(
2021
)
25.
J.
Ghorbani
,
M.
Nazem
,
J.
Kodikara
, and
P.
Wriggers
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
384
,
113974
(
2021
)
26.
T.
Lin
,
H.
Ou
, and
R.
Li
,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
196
,
1716
(
2007
)
27.
A. R.
Nasution
and
E.
Widodo
,
R.E.M. (Rekayasa Energi Manufaktur) J.
7
,
1
(
2022
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.