Bricks are one of the most important components in a building. Commonly, bricks are used as fundamental component for manufacturing of house or building, it were chosen because the price very cheap, easy to obtain, has a high enough strength, is resistant to weather because the way it is made is burned. This research was conducted to determine the comparison of bricks without burning with traditional bricks with burning using SNI 15-2094-2000. This study used palm shell ash and lime as an adhesive, in a ratio of 1:8:2:2 on both types of soil and with the addition of sand. The test specimen mold is made of steel with a length of 20 cm, a width of 10 cm, and a height of 6 cm. and the specimens were dried in the sun with a drying age of 7 days. The results obtained from this study bricks using palm shell ash without burning the compressive strength value were higher than traditional bricks with combustion in a ratio of 3.82: 3.01, and the value of salt content, water absorption and visible properties of brick without burning was higher. better than traditional brick by burning. With a ratio of 0.002% salt content: 0.14%. And the comparison of the water absorption value of the bricks is 0.150%: 0.247%. Comparison of the visible properties of unburned bricks with traditional bricks with better burning quality of unburned bricks because they use special molding tools using steel with sizes according to SNI standards and then press them using a hydraulic pump.

1.
H.
Prayuda
,
EA
Setyawan
, and
F.
Saleh
, “
Analysis Of Physical And Mechanical Properties Of Red Brick In
,”
1
(
2
)
94
104
(
2018
).
2.
R.
Hendri
,
J.
Fajrin
, and
NN
Kencanawati
, “
Evaluation of the Characteristics and Quality of Red Brick Produced in the District of East Lombok
,” (
2016
).
3.
J.
Pendidikan
and
T.
Building
, “
Characteristics Of No-Combusing Brick From Waste
,”
(2
)
8
12
(
2018
).
4.
Danm
Bata
, “
Utilization of Sugarcane Bagasse
,”
6
(
1
)
64
70
(
2016
).
5.
A.
Fattah
,
A.
Nabi
,
D.
Major
,
T.
Civil
,
P.
Negeri
, and
U.
Pandang
, “
Figure 1. Exterior Testing
,”
2018
208
214
(
2018
).
6.
K.
Gunungpati
and
K.
Semarang
, “
O Cement Optimation In The Manufacturing Of Brick Without Root
,” (
1945
).
7.
SY
Manurung
, “
Manufacture of Portland Cement
,” (2015) 38, (2019) [Online]. Available: http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/23790/4/Chapter%20I.pdf (
2019
)
8.
T.
Kapasiang
,
M.
Bukit
, and
J.
Tarigan
,
J. Fis. Science and Apps
2
(
2
),
92
100
(
2017
).
9.
M.
Salahuddin
, “
Brick-forming Material 1. Clay.
,”
1
(
2
)
34
46
(
2010
).
10.
D.
Rosalia
,
Elhusna
, and
A.
Gunawan
,
Jur. Tech. Civil Univ. Bangalore
5
(
1
),
85
95
(
1996
).
11.
NH
Haryanti
and
H.
Wardhana
,
J. Fis. Indonesia
21
(
3
),
11
(
2019
), .
12.
A.
Jeklin
, “
済無No Title No Title No Title
,”
1
23
(
2016
).
13.
S.
Sukobar
,
K.
Kuntjoro
,
K.
Kusumastuti
, and
S.
Sungkono
,
J. App. Tech. Civil
12
(
2
),
13
(
2014
). .
14.
T.
Civil
,
U.
Muhammadiyah
, and
S.
Utara
, “
Evaluation of Lubuk Brick Stiffness
,” 11–15. [15] SNI-15-2094-2000, “Solid Red Brick For Wall Pairs,” Sni 15-2094-2000,
11
22
(
2000
).
15.
S.
Handayani
,
J. Tek. Civil and Perenc.
,
12
(
1
)
41
50
(
2010
). .
16.
B.
Hidayat
, “
Evaluation of Brick Testing Methods
,”
247
253
(
2015
).
17.
S.
Frapanti
,
R.
Efrida
,
I.
Dewi
,
S.
Asfiati
, and
M.
Yani
, “
Study on Quality Inspection of SNI Standard Red Bricks in Deli Serdang Regency Compressive Strength Class Kg/cm Coefficient of Permit Variance
,”
5
(
2000
).
18.
F.
Sri
and
W. D.
Rhini
, “
Stiffness analysis comparison of masonry full infills frame and masonry open middle span frame using Lubuk Pakam Bricks with pushover analysis
,”
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
,
674
(
1
) (
2019
). doi: .
19.
F. V.
Riza
,
I. A.
Rahman
,
A.
Mujahid
, and
A.
Zaidi
, “
A brief review of Compressed Stabilized Earth Brick (CSEB
),”
CSSR Int. Conf. Sci. Soc. Res.
,
999
1004
(
2010
), doi: .
20.
T.
Syaelendra
,
E.
Septiandini
and
N.
Nasution
,
Tower: Journal of Civil Engineering
,
7
(
1
)
17
33
(
2012
). .
21.
Regency
,
B.
, &
Serdang
,
D
,
JURNAL PRODIKMAS Results of Community Service
5
(
76
),
41
46
, (
2020
). .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.