Experiential learning methods are desirable for students and constitute a motivation to make understandable structural concepts without complicated calculations. This research investigates the effect of that method on the development of knowledge needed in Architectural engineering education. Through a hands-on workshop, this research explores the experiential learning method of structural engineering science at the university level, by implementing selected examples using simple materials. This workshop aimed to deepen the understanding of the basic principles of structural engineering education of the architecture learner. The whole process was done without numerous calculations but only with the stimuli received by the student through targeted, tangible, and simple hands-on simulations, based on David Kolb’s experiential learning cycle. Through the motivation of the experiential learning approach, this paper assesses the positive effects on all grade Architectural School students’ engagement with experiential learning. The statistical analysis of the answers to the questionnaires showed an excellent improvement in the student’s cognitive, communicative, and metacognitive skills. The statistical analysis of the data collected from filling out a questionnaire with multiple choice questions showed excellent student satisfaction with the workshop at a rate of 100%, with 82.8% understanding the concepts better, 93.1% considering group collaboration successful, 79.3% enjoying the 3D construction simulation activities and 75.8% confirm the help of the experiential laboratory in the learning process of structural science courses. The current investigation demonstrates that it is vital to integrate the motivation of experiential learning through dedicated seminars, hands-on workshops, or advanced laboratories into the broader Architectural School curriculum.

1.
S.
Daniel
,
A phenomenographic outcome space for ways of experiencing lecturing
.
Higher Education Research & Development
41
, pp.
681
698
(
2022
).
2.
D. A.
Kolb
,
Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
(
FT press
,
2014
).
3.
J.
Seaman
,
M.
Brown
and
J.
Quay
.
The evolution of experiential learning theory: tracing lines of research in the JEE
.
Journal of Experiential Education
40
,
NP1
NP21
(
2017
).
4.
C. R.
Lotter
,
C.
Miller
,
Improving Inquiry Teaching through Reflection on Practice
.
Res Sci Educ
47
,
913
942
(
2017
).
5.
M. I.
Dorfsman
and
G.
Horenczyk
,
Educational approaches and contexts in the development of a heritage museum
.
The Journal of Experiential Education
41
,
170
186
(
2018
).
6.
T.
Ji
,
A. J.
Bell
and
B. R.
Ellis
,
Understanding and Using Structural Concepts
(2nd ed,
CRC Press
,
2015
)
7.
Ji
,
T.
,
A. J.
Bell
, and
Y.
Wu
,
The philosophical basis of Seeing and Touching Structural Concepts
.
European Journal of Engineering Education
22
,
91
98
(
2021
).
8.
M. G.
Salvadori
,
R.
Heller
and
D. J.
Oakley
.
Salvadori’s Structure in Architecture: The Building of Buildings
.
Boston: Pearson. Schuster
,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
(
2017
)
9.
L.
Sgambi
,
L.
Kubiak
,
N.
Basso
, and
E.
Garavaglia
,
Active learning for the promotion of students’ creativity and critical thinking: an experience in structural courses for architecture
.
International Journal of Architectural Research, ArchNet-IJAR.
13
,
386
407
(
2019
).
10.
J. E. D.
Moscardó
,
D. A.
Trujillo
,
L. M. D. C.
Cejudo
,
A. R.
Caro
and
C. J.
Almenara
,
The effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives on learning and motivation in structural engineering
.
Journal of Engineering Education
111
,
813
851
(
2022
).
11.
A. E.
Mazzurco
,
E.
Crossin
,
S.
Chandrasekaran
,
S.
Daniel
, and
G.R.P.
Sadewo
,
Empirical research studies of practicing engineers: a mapping review of journal articles 2000-2018
.
European Journal of Engineering Education
46
,
479
502
(
2021
).
12.
A. Y.
Kolb
and
D.A.
Kolb
,
Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education
.
Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education
1
, No.
1
,
7
(
2017
).
13.
D.
Klahr
,
L.M.
Triona
. and
C.
Williams
,
Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children
.
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
44
,
183
203
(
2007
).
14.
M. E.
Voutetaki
,
N. A.
Papadopoulos
,
G. M.
Angeli
. and
C.P.
Providakis
,
Investigation of a new experimental method for damage assessment of RC beams failing in shear using piezoelectric transducers
,
Engineering Structures
114
,
226
4
(
2016
)
15.
C. E.
Chalioris
,
N.
Papadopoulos
,
G.
Angeli
,
C.
Karayannis
,
A.
Liolios
, and
C.
Providakis
.
Damage Evaluation in Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Beam using Piezoelectric Transducers as Smart Aggregates
.
Open engineering.
5
, pp.
373
384
. (
2015
). .
16.
C. E.
Chalioris
,
V. K.
Kytinou
,
M. E.
Voutetaki
, and
C. G.
Karayannis
.
Flexural damage diagnosis in reinforced concrete beams using a wireless admittance monitoring system—Tests and finite element analysis
.
Sensors.
21
(
3
): pp.
679
. (
2021
). .
17.
A. K.
Thomoglou
and
A. I.
Karabinis
,
Experimental investigation of the shear strength of hollow brick unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted with TRM system
.
Earthquakes and Structures
22
,
355
372
(
2022
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.