Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) offer great potential for hearing diagnosis, but are complicated by the interaction of components generated by different mechanisms. Separation of these components from DPOAE measurements may allow conclusions to be drawn about the functionality of these separate mechanisms of a cochlear. However, the signal processing methods for performing this separation are imperfect. Existing methods are based on time windowing of DPOAE generated from frequency sweep stimuli.

This paper presents a method in which the entire spectra of both distortion (D) and reflection (R) components are simultaneously estimated. This approach has several advantages. Firstly, the method removes the need for a compromise between frequency precision and signal to noise ratio. Secondly, the method can be made to include models of the stimulus signals, so that the stimulus does not strongly interfere with the estimation process. Thirdly, the method can be arranged to make efficient use of data that has been corrupted by measurement artefacts. Fourthly, the method can be easily adapted to track DPOAEs that are changing in response to chemical or acoustic treatments.

The basic modelling assumptions made are that the sum of R and D measurements can be represented as the sum of convolutions with the stimulus signal, the frequency representation of the D component is more smooth than the R component, and that a reasonable estimate of the noise level in the signal is available. These assumptions are combined into a linear convex problem. In this paper we compare the proposed approach with three other methods. While it is not superior to the earlier methods at every frequency, it does offer some improvement, particularly with regards reducing the contamination of D by R.

1.
M.
Whitehead
,
B.
Lonsbury-Martin
, and
G.
Martin
, “
Evidence for two discrete sources of 2 f1f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. differential dependence on stimulus parameters
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
91
,
1587
1607
(
1992
), .
2.
M.
Whitehead
,
B.
Lonsbury-Martin
, and
G.
Martin
, “
Evidence for two discrete sources of 2 f1f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: II. differential physiological vulnerability
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
92
,
2662
2682
(
1992
), .
3.
C.
Talmadge
,
G.
Long
,
A.
Tubis
, and
S.
Dhar
, “
Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
105
,
275
292
(
1999
), .
4.
A.
Rao
and
G.
Long
, “
Effects of aspirin on distortion product fine structure: Interpreted by the two-source model for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
792
800
(
2011
), .
5.
C.
Abdala
,
A.
Ortmann
, and
C.
Shera
, “
Reflection- and distortion-source otoacoustic emissions: Evidence for increased irregularity in the hu-man cochlea during aging
,”
J. Assoc. Research in Otolaryngology
19
,
493
510
(
2018
), .
6.
R.
Knight
and
D.
Kemp
, “
Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
1513
1525
(
2001
), .
7.
R.
Kalluri
and
C.
Shera
, “
Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
109
,
622
637
(
2001
), .
8.
G.
Long
,
C.
Talmadge
, and
J.
Lee
, “
Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
124
,
1613
1626
(
2008
), .
9.
G.
Housley
,
R.
Morton-Jones
,
S.
Vlajkovic
,
R.
Telang
,
V.
Paramananthasivam
,
S.
Tadros
,
A.
Wong
,
K.
Froud
,
J.
Cederholm
,
Y.
Sivakumaran
,
P.
Snguanwongchai
,
B.
Khakh
,
D.
Cockayne
,
P.
Thorne
, and
A.
Ryan
, “
ATP-gated ion channels mediate adaptation to elevated sound levels
,”
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences
110
,
7494
7499
(
2012
), .
10.
J.
Cederholm
,
A.
Ryan
, and
G.
Housley
, “
Onset kinetics of noise-induced purinergic adaptation of the ‘cochlear amplifier
’,”
Purinergic Sig-nalling
15
,
343
355
(
2019
), .
11.
C.
Abdala
,
F.
Guérit
,
P.
Luo
, and
C.
Shera
, “
Distortion-product otoacoustic emission reflection-component delays and cochlear tuning: esti-mates from across the human lifespan
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
135
,
1950
1958
(
2014
), .
12.
C.
Abdala
,
P.
Luo
, and
C.
Shera
, “
Optimizing swept-tones to measure DPOAEs in adult and newborn ears
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
138
,
3785
3799
(
2015
), https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4937611.
13.
C.
Abdala
,
P.
Luo
, and
C.
Shera
, “Comparison of methods for DPOAE component separation,” in
39th midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
(
San Diego
,
2016
).
14.
A.
Moleti
,
F.
Longo
, and
R.
Sisto
, “
Time-frequency domain filtering of evoked otoacoustic emissions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
2455
2467
(
2012
), .
15.
G.
Tognola
,
F.
Grandori
, and
P.
Ravazzani
, “
Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions
,”
Hear Res.
106
,
112
122
(
1997
), .
16.
M.
Whitehead
,
B.
Stagner
,
G.
Martin
, and
B.
Lonsbury-Martin
, “
Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
100
,
1663
1679
(
1996
), .
17.
S. M.
Kay
,
Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory
(
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1993
).
18.
H.
Bauschke
and
J.
Borwein
, “
On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems
,”
SIAM Rev.
38
,
367
426
(
1996
), https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1137/S0036144593251710.
19.
J.
Boyle
and
R.
Dykstra
, “
A method for finding projections onto the intersection of convex sets in Hilbert spaces
,”
Lecture Notes in Statistics
37
,
28
47
(
1986
), .
20.
A.
Beck
and
M.
Teboulle
, “
A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems
,”
SIAM J. Imaging Sciences
2
,
183
202
(
2009
), https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1137/080716542.
21.
C.
Shera
and
C.
Bergevin
, “
Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
132
,
927
943
(
2012
), .
22.
C.
Shera
,
J.
Guinan
, Jr., and
A.
Oxenham
, “
Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements
,”
Proc. Nat. Academy Sci.
(PNAS)
99
,
3318
3323
(
2002
), .
23.
C.
Abdala
,
S.
Dhar
, and
R.
Kalluri
, “
Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
129
,
3123
3133
(
2011
), .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.