According to the dominant view, the mammalian cochlea spatially amplifies signals by actively pumping energy into the traveling wave. That is, signals are amplified as they propagate through a region where the medium’s resistance is effectively negative. While signal amplification has been extensively studied in active cochlear models, the same cannot be said for amplification of internal noise. According to transmission-line theory, signals are amplified more than internal noise in regions where the net resistance is negative. Here we generalize this finding by showing that a distributed system composed of cascaded “noisy” amplifiers boosts signals more rapidly than the internal noise; the larger the amplifier gain, the larger the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the amplified signal. We further show that this mechanism operates in existing active cochlear models: the cochlear amplifier increases the SNR of cochlear responses, and thus enhances cochlear sensitivity. When considering also that the cochlear amplifier narrows the bandwidth of the “cochlear filters”, activation of the cochlear amplifiers dramatically increases the SNR (by about one order of magnitude in our simulations) from the tail to the peak of the traveling wave. We further demonstrate that the tapered ear-horn-like cochlear geometry significantly improves the SNR of basilar-membrane responses.

1.
K. K. N.
Chang
, “
Theory of a negative-resistance transmission line amplifier with distributed noise generators
,”
J Applied Phys
31
,
871
875
(
1960
).
2.
S. T.
Neely
and
D.
Kim
, “
A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
79
,
1472
1480
(
1986
).
3.
G.
Zweig
, “
Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti
.”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
,
1229
1254
(
1991
).
4.
C. A.
Shera
and
G.
Zweig
, “
A symmetry suppresses the cochlear catastrophe
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
89
,
1276
1289
(
1991
).
5.
S.
Puria
and
J. B.
Allen
, “
A parametric study of cochlear input impedance
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am
89
,
287
309
(
1991
).
6.
E.
de Boer
and
A. L.
Nuttall
, “
The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
107
,
1497
1507
(
2000
).
7.
A. L.
Nuttall
,
M.
Guo
,
T.
Ren
, and
D. F.
Dolan
, “
Basilar membrane velocity noise
,”
Hear. Res.
114
,
35
42
(
1997
).
8.
A.
Altoè
and
C. A.
Shera
, “
The cochlear ear horn: Geometric origin of tonotopic variations in the sharpness of tuning
,”
Sci. Rep.
10
,
20528
(
2020
).
9.
N.
Wiener
,
Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series: with engineering applications
, Vol.
113
(
MIT press
Cambridge, MA
,
1949
).
10.
A.
Altoè
and
C. A.
Shera
, “
Nonlinear cochlear mechanics without direct vibration-amplification feedback
,”
Phys. Rev. Res.
2
,
013218
(
2020
).
11.
A.
Altoè
,
K. K.
Charaziak
,
J. B.
Dewey
,
A.
Moleti
,
R.
Sisto
,
J. S.
Oghalai
, and
C. A.
Shera
, “
The elusive cochlear filter: Wave origin of cochlear cross-frequency masking
,”
J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.
22
,
623
640
(
2021
).
12.
C. A.
Shera
,
A.
Tubis
, and
C. L.
Talmadge
, “
Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
118
,
287
313
(
2005
).
13.
M.
van der Heijden
and
A.
Vavakou
, “
Rectifying and sluggish: outer hair cells as regulators rather than amplifiers
,”
Hear Res
,
108367
(
2021
).
14.
P. M.
Quiñones
,
S. W.
Meenderink
,
B. E.
Applegate
, and
J. S.
Oghalai
, “
Unloading outer hair cell bundles in vivo does not yield evidence of spontaneous oscillations in the mouse cochlea
,”
Hear. Res.
,
108473
(
2022
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.