Students are now expected to think creatively and analytically when solving mathematical problems, as well as to be able to answer questions with high thinking power, or what is known as Higher-Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Providing Open-ended Problems (OEP) or open problems means problems that can be solved in a variety of ways (flexibility), and the solutions can also vary so that students can think creatively. This study aims to examine students’ thinking skills and analysis when solving OEP questions in mathematics class. This qualitative study uses a descriptive presentation method and a case study approach. This study included 134 grade 6 students in Palembang City for the 2022/2023 school year. A written test presented in the OEP was used to collect data in this study. According to the study, students’ thinking power is determined by their ability to solve OEP; the higher their ability to solve OEP, the more indicators they achieve. Students with solid thinking and analytical skills can meet the indicators of analyzing, evaluating, and creating. Students with average abilities can meet the analysis and evaluation indicators. Students with low abilities did not fully meet the indicators of analyzing, and it is possible that they still need to meet the indicators of evaluating and creating.

1.
D. B.
Audretsch
,
J. Technol. Transf.
vol.
39
, no.
3
, pp.
313
321
,
2014
.
2.
A.
Lavazza
,
The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought.
Volume
1
,
Springer
,
2021
, pp.
259
289
.
3.
I.
Islamiaty
,
K.
Karoma
,
M.
Mardeli
,
S.
Sukirman
, and
S.
Syarnubi
,
J. PAI Raden Fatah.
vol.
2
, no.
4
, pp.
397
413
,
2020
.
4.
S. B.
Piasta
,
C. Y.
Pelatti
, and
H. L.
Miller
,
Early Educ. Dev.
, vol.
25
, no.
4
, pp.
445
468
,
2014
.
5.
A.
Sfard
,
Educ. Stud. Math.
vol.
46
, no.
1
, pp.
13
57
,
2001
.
6.
K.
Devlin
,
Chapman and Hall/CRC.
2018
.
7.
C.
Kieran
,
Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra
.
Routledge
,
2018
, pp.
33
56
.
8.
N.
Metawa
,
M. K.
Hassan
, and
M.
Elhoseny
,
Expert Syst. Appl.
vol.
80
, pp.
75
82
,
2017
.
9.
R. E.
Simamora
and
S.
Saragih
,
Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ.
vol.
14
, no.
1
, pp.
61
72
,
2019
.
10.
L.
Puspita
,
K.
Komarudin
, and
M.
Astriani
,
JPBI J. Pendidik. Biol. Indones.
vol.
6
, no.
2
, pp.
347
354
,
2020
.
11.
S.
Huda
,
M.
Syazali
, and
R.
Umam
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
2020
, vol.
1467
, no.
1
, p.
012001
.
12.
E. M.
Mulenga
and
J. M.
Marbán
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
vol.
16
, no.
9
, p.
em1872
,
2020
.
13.
E. E.
Rohaeti
,
M.
Bernard
, and
R. B.
Primandhika
,
J. Math. Educ.
vol.
10
, no.
1
, pp.
59
68
,
2019
.
14.
K. E.
de Ries
,
H.
Schaap
,
A.-M. M.
van Loon
,
M. M.
Kral
, and
P. C.
Meijer
,
Qual. Quant.
vol.
56
, no.
1
, pp.
73
107
,
2022
.
15.
Y. F.
Surya
,
R.
Marta
, and
T. T.
Wijaya
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
2020
, vol.
1613
, no.
1
, p.
012081
.
16.
L. P.
Cidrayanti
,
I. I. W.
Suwatra
, and
M.
Sumantri
,
Mimb. PGSD Undiksha.
vol.
4
, no.
1
,
2016
.
17.
L. Z. K.
Saadah
and
M.
Irvan
,
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
2019
, vol.
243
, no.
1
, p.
012141
.
18.
C.
Bokhove
and
K.
Jones
,
Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving.
Springer
,
2018
, pp.
301
319
.
19.
H. T.
Damayanti
and
S.
Sumardi
,
JRAMathEdu J. Res. Adv. Math. Educ.
vol.
3
, no.
1
, pp.
36
45
,
2018
.
20.
R.
Ulinnuha
and
R.
Rochmad
,
Unnes J. Math. Educ. Res.
vol.
10
, no.
A
, pp.
20
25
,
2021
.
21.
D. F.
Tanjung
,
E.
Syahputra
, and
I.
Irvan
,
JTAM J. Teori Dan Apl. Mat.
vol.
4
, no.
1
, pp.
9
16
,
2020
.
22.
D.
Damsir
,
M.
Idris
, and
R.
Rizhardi
,
JOLMA.
vol.
1
, no.
1
, pp.
41
53
,
2021
.
23.
M.
Aziza
,
Edumatika J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat.
vol.
4
, no.
1
, pp.
9
21
,
2021
.
24.
A. H.
Hindman
,
B. A.
Wasik
, and
D. E.
Bradley
,
Early Educ. Dev.
, vol.
30
, no.
4
, pp.
478
495
,
2019
.
25.
R. S.
Deshmukh
,
T. A.
Zucker
,
S. R.
Tambyraja
,
J. M.
Pentimonti
,
R. P.
Bowles
, and
L. M.
Justice
,
Early Child. Res. Q.
vol.
49
, pp.
59
68
,
2019
.
26.
P.
Sugiyono
,
Alpabeta Bdg.
,
2011
.
27.
T. T.
Nguyen
,
N. D.
Nguyen
, and
S.
Nahavandi
,
IEEE Trans. Cybern.
vol.
50
, no.
9
, pp.
3826
3839
,
2020
.
28.
J. H.
Milton
,
M. M.
Flores
,
A. J.
Moore
,
J. J.
Taylor
, and
M. E.
Burton
,
Learn. Disabil. Q.
vol.
42
, no.
1
, pp.
32
45
,
2019
.
29.
R. O.
Kellems
et al.,
J. Learn. Disabil.
vol.
53
, no.
4
, pp.
277
291
,
2020
.
30.
L. M.
Rosenblatt
,
Theoretical models and processes of literacy
,
Routledge
,
2018
, pp.
451
479
.
31.
T.
Seifert
and
O.
Feliks
,
Assess. Eval. High. Educ.
vol.
44
, no.
2
, pp.
169
185
,
2019
.
32.
B. J.
Reiser
,
The Journal of the Learning sciences
.
Psychology Press
,
2018
, pp.
273
304
.
33.
R. E.
Simamora
and
S.
Saragih
,
Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ.
vol.
14
, no.
1
, pp.
61
72
,
2019
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.