This study aims to determine the feasibility and practicality of the Arduino-based inclination board props for motion dynamics material. The research method used is a development research method, according to Jan Van Den Akker, which consists of four stages: (1) preliminary research, (2) prototyping stage, (3) assessment stage, and (4) systemic reflection and documentation. The results showed that the teaching aids were feasible, with 87.5% by media experts, 97.22% by material experts, and 90.4% in all evaluation stages. The teaching aids are also said to be practical, with a percentage of 92% of educators’ questionnaires and 82.2% of students’ questionnaires. Further research can be carried out with various experimental materials so that students can find out the effect of the type of surface on the object used. It can be concluded that Arduino-based teaching aids are very suitable for use in the learning process.

Topics
Newtonian mechanics, Students, Learning and learning models, Teaching, Educator
1.
S.
Supriyatna
 &
L.
Roza
.
Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian [Journal of Research Innovation]
,
2
(
1
),
69
–
78
(
2021
).
Google Scholar
 
2.
U.
Sari
.
Physics Education
,
54
(
3
) (
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab0919
Google Scholar
 
3.
H.
Deliana
, and
Sugianto
.
PROSIDING Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika FITK UNSIQ [Proceedings of the FITK UNSIQ Physics Education Seminar]2020
,
2
(
1
) (
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
M.Y.
Qosim
,
J.
Handhika
, and
M.
Sasono
.
Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika [Periodical Journal of Physics Education]
,
13
(
2
),
35
–
39
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
5.
W.
Kurniawan
 and
D. E.
Handayani
.
Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP) [Journal of Physical Sciences and Learning (JIFP)]
,
2
(
2
),
49
–
52
(2018).
https://doi.org/10.19109/jifp.v2i2.2748
Crossref
Search ADS
 
6.
D. F.
Nurilyasari
,
A.
Zainuddin
, and
P.A.
Hariyanto
.
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika [Physics Education Research Journal]
,
3
(
1
),
15
–
21
(2018).
7.
M.
Hikmah
,
M.A. S.
Haryandi
.
Prosiding: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, (Oktober) [Proceedings: National Physics Education Seminar, (October)]
,
55
–
64
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
8.
J. V.
Akker
.
An Introduction to Educational Design Research
. Edited by
T.
Plomp
 and
N.
Nieveen
.
Netherlands
. (
2007
)
Google Scholar
 
9.
U.
Dilek
, and
S.
Çalişkan
.
Physics Education
,
52
(
6
), (
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aa8a4e
Google Scholar
 
10.
F.K.
Sekarpratiwi
.
Unnes Physics Education Journal
,
7
(
2
), (
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
K.
Mega
.
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika [IPF: Physics Education Innovation]
,
09
(
02
),
97
–
103
(
2020
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
R. R.
Dewi
, and
S.
Admoko
.
Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika [Journal of Physics Education Innovation]
,
07
(
02
),
191
–
195
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
Riduwan
.
Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru-Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula [Easy Learning Research For Teacher-Employees and Beginner Researchers].
Bandung
:
Alfabeta
(
2015
)
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.
2024
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.