When students are faced with mathematical problems that require students to represent the problem into mathematical expressions in the form of symbols, pictures, graphs or tables, students have difficulty solving these problems because of a lack of understanding of mathematical concepts. The ability of representation is not only influenced by academics but can be influenced by the use of learning media. One way to improve the ability to represent mathematical models by using ICT-based learning media Nearpod will make it easier for students to understand mathematics learning materials. Nearpod application that has many innovative and educational features to create interactive learning. So this study aims to describe the ability to represent mathematical models for the topic system of linear equation two variable class VIII using a mathematical modeling approach through ICT-based learning media. This research is a type of qualitative descriptive research with research variables, namely the ability to represent mathematical models. The subjects in this study were students of class VIII.1 SMP Negeri 26 Palembang. Data collection was done by written method and interview. The results of this study indicate that the ability to represent the mathematical model of class VIII.1 students at SMP Negeri 26 Palembang is in the good category. By using mathematical modeling learning assisted by nearpod learning media, it can help students in solving mathematical problems that require mathematical model representation skills.

1.
OECD
, “
PISA 2018 Results
,”
2019
2.
S.
Mulyaningsih
,
R.
Marlina
, &
S. N. K.
Effendi
,
JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika)
,
6
(
1
),
99
110
(
2020
).
3.
S. F.
Syafri
,
Jurnal e-DuMath,
3
(
1
) (
2017
).
4.
S.
Sulastri
,
M.
Marwan
, &
M.
Duskri
,
Beta: jurnal tadris matematika
,
10
(
1
),
51
69
, (
2017
).
5.
E. A.
Astin
, &
H.
Bharata
, (
2016
).
6.
NCTM
,
Principles and Standards – National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
(
2000
).
7.
E.
Komala
,
D.
Suryadi
, &
D.
Dasari
,
Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
,
10
(
4
),
2179
2187
(
2021
).
8.
S.
Rahmawati
,
Hartatiana
, &
Muslimahayati
,
Lentera Sriwijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
,
3
(
2
),
58
-
68
(
2021
)
9.
R. F.
Suwanto
,
Y. V.
Tobondo
, &
L.
Riskiningtyas
,
Prosiding Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (On-line)
(pp.
978
602
) (
2017
).
10.
A. J.
Hartono
, &
I.
Karnasih
, (
2017
).
11.
M.
Sabirin
,
Prosiding Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (On-line)
(pp.
978
602
) (
2014
).
12.
S. Y.
Achir
,
B.
Usodo
, &
R.
Setiawan
,
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan
,
20
(
1
),
78
87
. (
2017
).
13.
R. E.
Wulan
,
I.
Rofiqoh
, &
D.
Puspita
,
6
(
2
),
83
98
(
2021
)
14.
S. N.
Rahmawati
,
M.
Bernard
, &
P.
Akbar
,
Journal on Education
,
1
(
2
),
344
352
(
2019
).
15.
Oktaria
(
2016
)
16.
P. M. S.
Yekti
,
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
,
3
(
2
),
1689
1699
(
2018
).
17.
K.
Matondang
,
H.
Hasratuddin
,
D.
Armanto
,
Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan
,
4
(
1
),
22I8
241
(
2020
).
18.
M.
Wangge
,
Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika
,
1
(
1
),
31
38
(
2020
).
19.
R.
Fariz
, &
R. N.
Dewi
,
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika
(Vol.
5
, pp.
304
310
) (
2022
, February).
20.
A. R.
Ami
,
Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
,
6
(
2
),
135
148
(
2021
).
21.
A.
Feri
, &
Z.
Zulherman
,
Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
,
5
(
3
) (
2021
).
22.
M. R.
Indayani
(
2021
).
23.
N.
Fajriah
,
C.
Utami
, &
M.
Maryam
,
Journal Of Educational Review and Research
,
3
(
1
),
14
24
(
2020
)
24.
S.
Suratih
, &
H.
Pujiastuti
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
,
15
(
2
),
111
123
(
2020
).
25.
R.
Rifqi
(
2022
).
26.
R.
Inanta
,
Z.
Zulhaji
, &
I.
Indrayani
,
Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran,
4
(
1
),
418
424
. (
2022
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.