Based on a preliminary study at one of the state high schools in Blitar Regency, teaching materials in schools are limited to printed textbooks that have not been equipped with material explanations in the form of audio or audio-visual that is interactive, so they are still unable to facilitate students optimally. Students have difficulty understanding difficult concepts and materials, so most students score below the Minimum Completion Criteria. Thus, this development research is carried out with the aim of producing valid, practical, and effective interactive teaching materials to understand students’ mathematical concepts in trigonometric ratio material. This research uses the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation or Delivery and Evaluation) research model. The subjects of this study were class X MIPA 4 students of SMA Negeri 1 Kesamben, Blitar, totaling 35 students. The research data was obtained through validation sheets by expert lecturers and teachers, questionnaires of teacher and student responses, and also test questions for students. The interactive teaching materials developed in this study were declared valid, practical, and effective with an average validity score of 3.94; an average practicality score of 4.18; and an effectiveness percentage of 71.43%. So that the teaching materials can be applied to help understand students’ mathematical concepts in learning activities in the classroom on the subject matter of trigonometric ratios.

1.
Depdiknas
,
Juknis Pengembangan Bahan Ajar SMA
(
Direktorat Pembinaan SMA
,
Jakarta
,
2010
).
2.
P.
Andi
,
Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif: Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran Yang Menarik Dan Menyenangkan
(
Diva Press
,
Yogyakarta
,
2013
).
3.
J.
Kilpatrick
,
J.
Swafford
,
B.
Findell
, and
National Research Council (U.S)
,
Mathematics Learning Study Committee. Adding It up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics
(
Washington, DC
,
2001
).
4.
H.
Abdul
and
A.
Jihad
,
Evaluasi Pembelajaran
(
Multi Pressindo
,
Yogyakarta
,
2012
).
5.
Trisnaningsih
,
J. Ekon. Dan Pendidik.
4
,
1
(
2012
).
6.
I.M.
Sadjati
, in
Pengemb. Bahan Ajar
(
Universitas Terbuka
,
2012
), pp.
1
62
.
7.
M.
Jazuli
,
L.F.
Azizah
, and
N.M.
Meita
,
LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA
7
,
47
(
2018
).
8.
A.
Shoimin
,
Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013
, 1st ed. (
Ar-Ruzz Media
,
Yogyakarta
,
2017
).
9.
A.N.
Zain
,
L.
Supardi
, and
H.
Lanya
,
Sigma
3
,
12
(
2017
).
10.
W.A.
Putri
and
T.N.H.
Yunianta
,
Satya Widya
34
,
88
(
2019
).
11.
F.
Rosyi
,
A.N.
Fatirul
, and
Hartono
,
5
,
38
(
2020
).
12.
O.
Ulyani
and
A.
Qohar
,
AIP Conf. Proc.
2330
, (
2021
).
13.
N.
Hidayati
and
Roesdiana
,
JP3M J. Penelit. Pendidik. Dan Pengajaran Mat.
4
,
31
(
2019
).
14.
E.
Sukaesih
,
H.
Nindiasari
, and
A.
Fatah
,
TIRTAMATH J. Penelit. Dan Pengajaran Mat.
2
,
86
(
2020
).
15.
R.
Wahyuni
,
M.
Mariyam
, and
V.R.A.
Kumang
,
J. Educ. Rev. Res.
2
,
12
(
2019
).
16.
E.
Mulyatiningsih
,
Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan
(
Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2019
).
17.
U.O.
Norsanty
and
Z.
Chairani
,
Math Didact. J. Pendidik. Mat.
2
,
12
(
2016
).
18.
Nurhairunnisah
and
Sujarwo
,
J. Inov. Teknol. Pendidik.
5
,
192
(
2018
).
19.
I.
Hidayat
,
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran CORE (Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Materi Bangun Datar Segi Empat Siswa Kelas VII SMP N 8 Purwokerto, IAIN
,
2019
.
20.
M.
Mamata
,
J. J. Pendidik. Dan Bimbing. Konseling
01
, (
2020
).
21.
V.R.
Rahmawati
,
Pengembangan LKPD Interaktf Menggunakan Live Worksheets Untuk Membangun Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Transformasi Geometri
,
Universitas Negeri Malang
,
2021
.
22.
W.
Sanjaya
,
Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan
, 13th ed. (
Penerbit Kencana
,
Jakarta
,
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.