The utilization of technology and information is needed to create interactive learning media. One of the uses of technology and information in learning is an e-worksheet. This e-worksheet could be implemented as a learning media and e-worksheet to support education. In addition to problem-solving abilities, several affective aspects must be considered and contribute to student learning success, one of which is student learning motivation. This research was intended (1) to investigate the difference in the ability to solve problems of students who are low, moderate, and highly motivated. (2) to examine the differences in students’ ability to solve math problems with and without the e-worksheet. (3) to identify the interaction between the e-worksheet and learning motivation on students’ problem-solving ability. The sampling technique chosen was the purposive sampling technique. The selected samples were 28 and 22 students of class VII F and VII G of SMPN 1 Bantarkawung. In this research, the instruments included a student learning motivation questionnaire and a math problem-solving skill test. The data analysis techniques in this research are prerequisite test, t-tests, and hypothesis test (ANOVA). The results showed that 1) differences in solving problems exist in low, medium, and high motivation students. 2) the ability to solve problems differed among those who used e-worksheet and those who did not use e-worksheet. 3) Interaction was not found between the usage of e-worksheet and students’ motivation on problem-solving ability.

1.
L. G. M. Z.
Atsani
,
J. Teknol. Pendidik.
22
,
65
70
(
2020
).
2.
D. S.
Setiana
,
B.
Kusumaningrum
and
R. Y.
Purwoko
,
Edumatika J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat.
4
,
104
111
(
2021
).
3.
B.
Kusumaningrum
and
Z.
Wijayanto
,
Kreano J. Mat. Kreatif-Inov.
11
,
136
142
(
2020
).
4.
R.
Pakpahan
and
Y.
Fitriani
,
JISAMAR (Journal Inf. Syst. Applied Manag. Account. Res.
)
4
,
30
36
(
2020
).
5.
S. W.
Lestari
,
J. Ilmu Pendidik.
2
,
13
24
(
2020
).
6.
R.
Puspita
,
E.
Yani
,
K.
Dinnisa
,
B.
Kusumaningrum
,
K. S.
Kuncoro
,
A. D.
Ayuningtyas
and
M.
Irfan
,
UNION J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat.
10
,
93
102
(
2022
).
7.
T. A.
Arigiyati
,
K. S.
Kuncoro
and
B.
Kusumaningrum
,
Kanigara
1
,
140
149
(
2021
).
8.
B.
Kusumaningrum
,
K. S.
Kuncoro
,
R. Y.
Purwoko
,
A. N.
Chasanah
,
D. N.
Setyawan
,
N. H. I.
Sari
and
R.
Puspita
,
EDUKATIF J. Ilmu Pendidik.
4
,
3712
3722
(
2022
).
9.
B.
Giesbers
,
B.
Rienties
,
D.
Tempelaar
and
W.
Gijselaers
,
Comput. Human Behav.
29
,
285
292
(
2013
).
10.
W.
He
,
A.
Holton
,
G.
Farkas
and
M.
Warschauer
,
Learn. Instr.
45
,
61
71
(
2016
).
11.
R. B.
Barr
and
J.
Tagg
,
Change Mag. High. Learn.
27
,
12
26
(
1995
).
12.
G. H.
Roehrig
,
T. J.
Moore
,
H. H.
Wang
and
M. S.
Park
,
Sch. Sci. Math.
112
,
31
44
(
2012
).
13.
A. M. I. T.
Asfar
and
S.
Nur
,
Silab. Educ.
7
,
124
132
(
2018
).
14.
B.
Kusumaningrum
,
M.
Irfan
and
Z.
Wijayanto
,
Kalamatika J. Pendidik. Mat.
5
,
119
132
(
2020
).
15.
T. P.
Carpenter
,
W.
Matthews
,
M. M.
Lindquist
and
E. A.
Silver
,
Elementary Sch. J.
84
,
485
495
(
1984
).
16.
P.
Ernest
,
Philos. Math. Educ. J.
15
,
1
16
(
2002
).
17.
18.
N. M.
Sari
,
J. Equ. Teori Penelit. Pendidik. Mat.
3
,
22
33
(
2020
).
19.
M. E.
Melanie
,
A.
Hartoyo
and
D.
Ahmad
,
J. Pendidik. Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa
5
,
1
11
(
2016
).
20.
I.
Maslova
,
G.
Burdina
and
I.
Krapotkina
,
Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn.
15
,
68
79
, (
2020
).
21.
S. D.
Maharani
,
R.
Susanti
and
L. H.
Indarti
,
J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res.
13
,
98
119
(
2022
).
22.
H. A.
Rahman
,
A.
Rajab
,
S. R. A.
Wahab
,
F. M.
Nor
,
W. Z. W.
Zakaria
and
M. A.
Badli
,
Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol.
7
,
543
547
(
2017
).
23.
E.
Shaunessy-Dedrick
,
S. M.
Suldo
,
R. A.
Roth
and
S. A.
Fefer
,
High Sch. J.
98
,
109
137
(
2015
).
24.
H. E.
Muse
Jr
,
Internet High. Educ.
6
,
241
261
(
2003
).
25.
M.
Marniati
,
J.
Jahring
and
J.
Jumriani
,
AKSIOMA J. Program Studi Pendidik. Mat.
10
,
880
890
(
2021
).
26.
D. A.
Cook
and
A. R.
Arthony
Jr
,
Med. Educ.
50
,
997
1014
(
2016
).
27.
A. C.
Mustika
,
I. W.
Lasmawan
, and
I. M.
Candiasa
, “
Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif STAD terhadap hasil belajar ditinjau dari motivasi belajar pada pembelajaran matematika siswa kelas IV SD Saraswati Tabanan
,” Ph.D Thesis,
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
,
2013
.
28.
M.
Kamza
,
H.
Husaini
and
I. L.
Ayu
,
J. Basicedu
5
,
4120
4126
(
2021
).
29.
R. Z.
Tussaadah
,
H.
Hendriana
and
W.
Yuliani
,
Fokus (Kajian Bimbing. Konseling Pendidik.
)
4
,
213
218
(
2021
).
30.
N. M.
Janna
and
H.
Herianto
, “
Konsep Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas dengan Menggunakan SPSS
” (
Makasar
,
2021
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.