Differentiated mathematics learning is needed to implement an independent curriculum, which requires teacher decisions to always be adaptive following the development of information technology tools and science. Mind mapping is a model of mathematical mapping concepts. In the core content, in-depth understanding can be obtained if it is associated with the prerequisite content that must be understood first. Mathematical knowledge can be more easily achieved when students can discuss numbers. Sleight of mouth is identical to the language of hearing, where the words used are always adapted to students’ perspectives. This research includes classroom action research that aims to overcome the problem of the class VII digital program related to the inadequate mobile network available in that class. The stages of this research consist of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The result showed that six students stood out in understanding the prerequisite content and in-depth understanding of the core content, namely comparison. It seemed that students had achieved the criteria for achieving learning objectives more quickly than other students. Feedback is done by remedial teaching to other students by forming discussion groups and utilizing peer tutors until completeness is completed ≥ 60% of the criteria for achieving learning objectives. The final reflection shows that overall, students can express the form of the function (from the comparison of worth/ reverse value) in the form of a graph. Follow-up feedback is carried out by providing enrichment to 6 students whose level of understanding is most prominent by presenting more complex realistic problems to be solved related to comparative content.

1.
A. Y.
Soegeng
and
G.
Abdullah
,
Landasan Kependidikan Jilid 1
(
Magnum Pustaka Utama
,
Yogyakarta
,
2017
).
2.
G. R.
Agasi
and
M. A.
Rudhito
,
Strategi Penyelesaian Siswa SMP dalam Mengerjakan Soal Kontekstual dengan Pendekatan Realistik, Prosiding SNMPM
, (
Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
,
Surakarta
,
2015
).
3.
P.
Yudiantara
,
Mind Hacking Protocol
(
Visi Media
,
South Jakarta
,
2013
).
4.
A. Y.
Soegeng
and
G.
Abdullah
,
Pengembangan Kurikulum
(
Magna Raharja Tama
,
Yogyakarta
,
2019
).
5.
I.
Aprinawati
,
J. Basicedu
2
,
40-147
(
2018
).
6.
T.
Buzan
,
The Ultimate Book of Mind Maps
(
HarperCollins Canada
,
Canada
,
2012
).
7.
Kemendikbud
,
Permendikbud No. 22 of 2020 Concerning the Strategic Plan of The Ministry of Education and Culture for 2020-2024
(
Kemendikbud
,
Jakarta
,
2020
).
8.
D.
Setyarini
,
J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar
6
,
30
44
(
2018
).
9.
M.
Yusuf
and
M.
Amin
,
J. Kegur. Ilm. Tarb
.
01,
85
92
(
2016
).
10.
N.
Adilah
,
Indones. J. Prim. Educ.
1
,
98
l03
(
2017
).
11.
B. A.
Saputro
,
M.
Prayito
and
F.
Nursyahidah
,
Geogebra Media Pembelajaran Matematika Dinamis di Sekolah
(
UPGRIS Press
,
Semarang
,
2015
).
12.
G.
Anisah
,
J. Pendidik. Kaji. Keislam.
03
,
65
76
(
2021
).
13.
E.
Harapan
and
S.
Ahmad
,
Komunikasi Antar Pribadi
(
PT. Raharja Grasindo Persada
,
Jakarta
,
2014
).
14.
A. N.
Mahfud
,
The Art of Positive Persuasion in Teaching
(
CV. Rafi Sarana Perkasa
,
Semarang
,
2016
).
15.
A. N.
Mahfud
,
Be A Good Teacher
(
CV. Rafi Sarana Perkasa
,
Semarang
,
2016
).
16.
N. Purwanto,
Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan
(
PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
,
Bandung
,
2016
).
17.
A. Y.
Soegeng
and
G.
Abdullah
,
Landasan Kependidikan Jilid 2
(
UPGRIS Press
,
Semarang
,
2016
).
18.
S.
Sugiyono
,
Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif
(
CV. Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2008
).
19.
D. L.
Safithri
and
M.
Muchlis
,
PENDIPA J. Sci. Educ.
6
,
547
555
(
2022
).
20.
B. K.
Sudiyanto
and
M.
Muhyadi
,
J. Penelit. Eval. Pendidik.
19
,
90
-
200
(
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.