Bridges with high piers exceeding 40 m are generally monoliths between girder and pier to accommodate lateral deformations and obtain high stiffness to achieve adequate elevation of the piers during an earthquake. This monolith PCI girder bridge was designed and built before the SNI 2833:2016 bridge earthquake regulation was issued. The bridge is supported by abutments and three tall piers with height of piers is 42.81 m to 46,451 m and consists of four PCI girder monolith spans with a length of each span of 35m+35m+35m+40m. The bridge structure is modeled using the finite element method. The piers and beams of the bridge are modeled as frame elements, and the deck as shell elements. The abutments are assumed to be joint supports and the pier legs are assumed to be fully clamped. The relationship between the girder and the head of piers is defined as a rigid link while the head of piers and the pier legs is defined as an elastic link of rigid type. This bridge is located in a strong earthquake area and has high piers so a more complex analysis is needed to predict the performance of the bridge structure by applying a nonlinear time history analysis using Elcentro earthquake. The observed structural responses are displacement, velocity, acceleration, and drift ratio at top of the piers P1, P2 and P3. The results show that the displacement is more dominant in the longitudinal direction of the bridge. The speed of both the longitudinal and transverse directions did not have a significant difference, while the acceleration of the bridge in the transverse direction was greater than longitudinal direction. Referring to the parameters given by NCHRP 440, the drift ratio is less than 1% so that the performance level of the PCI girder monolith bridge structure is included in the operational category.

1.
Naryanto
H.S
, “
Analysis of the potential for earthquakes and tsunamis in the west coast of Lampung in relation to mitigation and management of the area
”,
Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology
,
2008
, pp
71
77
.
2.
Iswandi I.
Bambang
,
B.
Kristiyanto
,
A.
Rusdiman
, Aris, “Continuous Girder Bridge System Case Study on Cisomang Bridge Planning,”
National Seminar on Material Engineering and Concrete Construction
,
Bandung
, Juni 4,
2005
(in bahasa)
3.
SNI 2833-2016
, “
Bridge Planning Against Earthquake Load
”. (in bahasa)
4.
Marian
S
, and
Onet
T
, “
Nonlinear Concrete Behavior
”,
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
,
2011
.
5.
Lagaros
N.D
,
Chara
Ch.M
,
Manolis
P
, “
Time History Seismic analysis
”,
National Technical University
,
2015
.
6.
Aviram
,
A.
,
Kevin
,
R.M.
,
Bozidar
,
S.
2008
.
Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California
,
Pacific Eartquake Engineering Ressearch Center
.
7.
Masrilayanti
M.
,
Nasution
,
A
,P.,
Kurniawan
,
R.
,
Tanjung
,
J.
, Sarmayenti, and
Sarmayenti
,
S.
,
Fragility Curve Analysis of Medium Cable Stayed Bridge
,
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Vol.
17
, Issue
1
,
209
218
,
2021
8.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis 440-2013
, “
Performance Based Seismic Bridge Design
”.
9.
Pratama
A. P
,
Taufik
S
,
Muttaqin
H
, “
Performance Assesment of The Bridge Pier Structure Against Time History of The Pidie Jaya Eartquake
”,
2021
, pp
164
171
10.
SNI 1725-2016
, “
Loading for Bridges
”. (in bahasa)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.