Carbon emissions have become an important part of planning with utilities, lenders, and lawmakers in need of comprehensive and accurate information on carbon value of energy sources to guide policy, planning, and investment decisions. There is need for well-informed energy policy design information to attain the decarburization targets and keep the global warming below 2°C threshold set by the Paris agreement. Low-carbon electricity supply for all is needed to attain the 2°C-compatible energy system for maximum electrification of economies. Life cycle assessment facilitate the evaluation of a product over its life cycle, and across various environmental indicators. Technologies assessed include coal, natural gas, hydropower, nuclear power, concentrated solar power (CSP), photovoltaics, and wind power. Life cycle assessment is a tool used to evaluate the environmental impact of energy sources. One major limitation of the standard life cycle assessment methodology is that it ignores the impact of the impact of greenhouse gases. Life-cycle impacts decrease substantially when current fossil fuel technologies diminish in the energy mix particularly coal. Natural gas use may play an important role during the transition while installation of new fossil options without CO2 capture should be avoided to minimize emissions. The endogenous integration of life-cycle indicators into energy models adds value to both life cycle assessment and energy systems modelling in their support in energy decision as well as policy-making for sustainable energy transition. Different power generation technologies have variations with respect to environmental impact, operational cost, and other factors. Each technology produces different levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, through construction, operation and decommissioning with coal fired power plants releasing most emission per unit power generation.

1.
WNA
, “Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources,”
World Nuclear Association
,
London, UK
, July 2011
2011
. [Online]. Available: https://www.world-nuclear.org/uploadedfiles/org/wna/publications/working_group_reports/comparison_of_lifecycle.pdf
2.
UNEP
, “
An Eye on Methane International Methane Emissions Observatory 2022 Report
,”
UN Environmental Program
,
Nairobi, Kenya
,
2022
, vol.
2023
. [Online]. Available: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/40864/eye_on_methane.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
3.
X.
Zhu
,
S.
Wang
, and
L.
Wang
, “
Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions of China’s power generation on spatial and temporal scale
,”
Energy Science & Engineering
, 10.1002/ese3.1100 vol.
10
, no.
4
, pp.
1083
1095
, 2022/04/01
2022
, doi: .
4.
D.
García-Gusano
,
M.
Martín-Gamboa
,
D.
Iribarren
, and
J.
Dufour
, “
Prospective Analysis of Life-Cycle Indicators through Endogenous Integration into a National Power Generation Model
,”
Resources
, vol.
5
, no.
4
, doi: .
5.
H.
Hondo
, “
Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case
,”
Energy
, vol.
30
, no.
11
, pp.
2042
2056
, 2005/08/01/
2005
, doi: .
6.
T.
Junne
,
K.-K.
Cao
,
K. K.
Miskiw
,
H.
Hottenroth
, and
T.
Naegler
, “
Considering Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Power System Expansion Planning for Europe and North Africa Using Multi-Objective Optimization
,”
Energies
, vol.
14
, no.
5
, doi: .
7.
M. J. B.
Kabeyi
and
O. A.
Olanrewaju
, “Diesel powerplants: design and operation and performance enhancements,”
presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
,
Rome, Italy
, July 26-28,
2022
, 2022,
425
. [Online]. Available: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/425.pdf.
8.
M. J. B.
Kabeyi
and
O. A.
Olanrewaju
, “The role of electrification of transport in the energy transition,”
presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
,
Rome, Italy
, July 26-28,
2022
, 2022,
426
. [Online]. Available: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/426.pdf.
9.
EPA
. “
Lifecycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the Renewable Fuel Standard
.”
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/lifecycle-analysis-greenhouse-gas-emissions-under-renewable-fuel (accessed 6 December 2022,
2022
).
10.
E.
Sproul
,
J.
Barlow
, and
J. C.
Quinn
, “
Time Value of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis
,”
Environmental Science & Technology
, vol.
53
, no.
10
, pp.
6073
6080
, 2019/05/21
2019
, doi: .
11.
United Nations Economic Commission For Europe
, “
Carbon Neutrality in the UNECE Region:Integrated Life-cycle Assessment of Electricity Sources
,”
United Nations Economic Commission For Europe
,
Geneva
,
2021
. [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/LCA_3_FINAL%20March%202022.pdf
12.
M.
Kabeyi
and
O.
Olanrewaju
, “
Performance analysis of a sugarcane bagasse cogeneration power plant in grid electricity generation
,”
presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore
, March 7-11,
2021
, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/201.pdf.
13.
M. G.
Paredes
,
A.
Padilla-Rivera
, and
L. P.
Güereca
, “
Life Cycle Assessment of Ocean Energy Technologies: A Systematic Review
,”
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
, vol.
7
, no.
9
, doi: .
14.
D.
Keith
. (
2018
)
The down side to wind power
.
The Harvard Gazette.
Available: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2018/10/large-scale-wind-power-has-its-down-side/
15.
M. J. B.
Kabeyi
and
O. A.
Olanweraju
, “Sustainability Assessment for Non-Combustible Renewable Power Generation”
presented at the 12th Annual Istanbul International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
,
Istanbul, Turkey
, March 7-10,
2022
, 2022, Paper
429
. [Online]. Available: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022istanbul/429.pdf.
16.
M. J. B.
Kabeyi
and
A. O.
Oludolapo
, “Managing Sustainability in Electricity Generation,”
presented at the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
,
Singapore, Singapore
, 14-17 December 2020,
2020
, IEEM20-P-0406 [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9309994.
17.
M. J. B.
Kabeyi
and
O. A.
Olanrewaju
, “
Sustainable Energy Transition for Renewable and Low Carbon Grid Electricity Generation and Supply
,” (in English),
Frontiers in Energy Research, Review
vol.
9
, no.
743114
, pp.
1
45
, 2022-March-24
2022
, doi: .
18.
M. J. B.
Kabeyi
and
O. A.
Olanrewaju
, “
Energy and environment: oportunities and challenges for the energy transition
,”
presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
, July 26-28,
2022
, 2022,
427
. [Online]. Available: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/427.pdf.
19.
S. M.
Jordaan
,
C.
Combs
, and
E.
Guenther
, “
Life cycle assessment of electricity generation: A systematic review of spatiotemporal methods
,”
Advances in Applied Energy
, vol.
3
, p.
100058
, 2021/08/25/
2021
, doi: .
20.
NREL
, “
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Generation
,”
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
2021
. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/57187.pdf
21.
J.
Wang
,
R.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhu
, and
J.
Li
, “
Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China
,”
Energy Policy
, vol.
115
, pp.
374
384
, 2018/04/01/
2018
, doi: .
22.
J. J. Cartelle
Barros
,
F.
de Llano Paz
,
M. Lara
Coira
,
M. P.
de la Cruz López
,
A.
del Caño Gochi
, and
I.
Soares
, “
New approach for assessing and optimising the environmental performance of multinational electricity sectors: A European case study
,”
Energy Conversion and Management
, vol.
268
, p.
116023
, 2022/09/15/
2022
, doi: .
23.
L.
Reijnders
, “Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” in
Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation
, W.-Y. Chen, J. Seiner, T. Suzuki, and M. Lackner Eds.
New York, NY
:
Springer US
,
2012
, pp.
13
41
.
24.
K.
Kleiner
, “
Nuclear energy: assessing the emissions
,”
Nature Climate Change
, vol.
1
, no.
810
, pp.
130
131
, 2008/10/01
2008
, doi: .
25.
IPCC
, “
Technology-specific Cost and Performance Parameters: Annex III
,”
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
,
2014
. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf
26.
A.
Uihlein
, “
Life cycle assessment of ocean energy technologies
,”
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
, vol.
21
, no.
10
, pp.
1425
1437
, 2016/10/01
2016
, doi: .
27.
M.
Kaddoura
,
J.
Tivander
, and
S.
Molander
, “
Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation from an Array of Subsea Tidal Kite Prototypes
,”
Energies
, vol.
13
, no.
2
, doi: .
28.
IPCC
, “Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change Summary for Policymakers Technical Summary,”
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge
,
United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
., January 2015
2015
. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/WGIIIAR5_SPM_TS_Volume-3.pdf
29.
E. S.
Warner
and
G. A.
Heath
, “
Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Nuclear Electricity Generation Systematic Review and Harmonization
,”
Journal of Industrial Ecology
, vol.
16
, no.
S1
, pp.
S72
S93
,
2012
, doi: .
30.
L.
Gagnon
,
C.
Bélanger
, and
Y.
Uchiyama
, “
Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in year 2001
,”
Energy Policy
, vol.
30
, no.
14
, pp.
1267
1278
, 2002/11/01/
2002
, doi: .
31.
B.
Corona
,
E.
Cerrajero
,
D.
López
, and
G. San
Miguel
, “
Full environmental life cycle cost analysis of concentrating solar power technology: Contribution of externalities to overall energy costs
,”
Solar Energy
, vol.
135
, pp.
758
768
, 2016/10/01/
2016
, doi: .
33.
UNECE
, “
Carbon Neutrality in the UNECE Region: Integrated Life-cycle Assessment of Electricity Sources
,”
United Nations Economic Commission For Europe
,
Uni
, 2021
2022
, vol.
2022
. [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/LCA_3_FINAL%20March%202022.pdf
34.
G.
Li
et al, “
Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming
,”
Energy
, vol.
199
, p.
117488
, 2020/05/15/
2020
, doi: .
35.
F.
Knobloch
et al, “
Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time
,”
Nature Sustainability
, vol.
3
, no.
6
, pp.
437
447
, 2020/06/01
2020
, doi: .
36.
F.
Knobloch
, “
Tell Me How: Can Electric Vehicles and Heat Pumps Reduce Emissions Despite the Energy Source?
,” ed:
World Bank
,
2022
.
37.
D.
Milborrow
. (
2019
)
WindEconomics: Extending lifetimes lowers nuclear costs
.
Wind Power Montlhy.
Available: https://www.windpowermonthly.com/article/1666771/windeconomics-extending-lifetimes-lowers-nuclear-costs
38.
S. K.
Johnson
, “Few exceptions to the rule that going electric reduces emissions,” in
Technica
, ed:
Technica
,
2020
.
39.
S.
Clark
. (
2020
, Saturday, 21 March 2020)
Is hydrogen the solution to net-zero home heating
.
The Guardian.
Available: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/mar/21/is-hydrogen-the-solution-to-net-zero-home-heating
40.
O.
Al-Kuwari
. “
Unexpected opportunity for natural gas
.” https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/unexpected-opportunity-for-natural-gas/ (accessed 9 November 2022,
2022
).
41.
M.
Kabeyi
and
O.
Olanrewaju
, “
Diesel to gas engine power plant conversion: a review and preliminary design for an operting power plant
,” (in en),
Journal of Energy Management and Technology
, vol.
7
, no.
2
, pp.
103
115
,
2023
, doi: .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.