The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has affected numerous countries worldwide, among which the U.S. is the leading country. Meanwhile, the U.S. has the world’s second-highest primary energy consumption, and the country is still heavily reliant on petroleum and natural gas that emit greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) during combustion. This study examines the direct and indirect effects of pandemic uncertainty and CO2 emissions on the nexus between energy consumption and gross domestic product (GDP) by employing discrete threshold estimation. Besides investigating the net or total asymmetric effects of energy consumption, this research includes four sectoral datasets in the model estimations, which are residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation. The period covered is 1996–2021, using quarterly data. The estimation results report an asymmetric relationship between energy consumption and GDP triggered by pandemic uncertainty and CO2 emissions. Yet, these asymmetric effects are small compared to the influences of GDP lag(s) and CO2 emissions. In addition, the pandemic uncertainty discloses a direct positive impact besides the indirect effect on the GDP. It is most likely due to the rebound effects. Total and sectoral CO2 emissions also have consequences on GDP directly and indirectly, where the direct impacts vary across regimes. The observable asymmetric effects of energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and the preceding economic situations could deliver more informative insights to the U.S. local government and policymakers.

1.
World Health Organization
(
2022
),
WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard, WWW document
, (https://covid19.who.int/)
2.
Enerdata
(
2022
),
World Energy & Climate Statistics –Yearbook 2021, WWW document
, (https://yearbook.enerdata.net/total-energy/world-consumption-statistics.html)
3.
IEA
(
2022
),
Global Energy Review: CO2 Emissions in 2021, WWW document
, (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-co2-emissions-in-2021-2)
4.
A. T.
Bayramoglu
and
E.
Yildirim
,
Energy and Power Engineering
9
,
170
186
(
2017
).
5.
M. G.
Patterson
,
Energy Policy
24
(
5
),
377
390
(
1996
).
6.
8.
L. A.
Greening
,
D. L.
Greene
, and
C.
Difiglio
,
Energy Policy
28
,
389
401
(
2000
).
9.
H. D.
Saunders
,
Energy Policy
28
,
439
449
(
2000
).
10.
R. B.
Howarth
,
Contemporary Economic Policy
XV
,
1
9
(
1997
).
11.
N.
Vlahinić-Dizdarević
and
S.
Žiković
,
Proceedings of Rijeka School of Economics 28
(
1
),
35
60
(
2010
).
12.
D. G.
Ockwell
,
Energy Policy
36
,
4600
4604
(
2008
).
13.
G. M.
Grossman
and
A. B.
Krueger
,
NEER Working Paper 3914
. (
National Bureau of Economic Research
,
Cambridge
,
1991
).
14.
T.
Panayotou
,
ILO Working Papers 992927783402676
. (
International Labour Office
,
Geneva
,
1993
).
15.
K.
Aruga
,
Sustainability
11
(
8
),
1
12
(
2019
).
16.
E.
Dogan
and
R.
Inglesi-Lotz
,
Environmental science and pollution research
27
(
11
),
12717
12724
(
2020
).
17.
A. A.
Alola
and
I.
Ozturk
,
Journal of Environmental Management
293
,
112890
(
2021
).
18.
O.
Usman
,
P. T.
Iorember
, and
I. O.
Olanipekun
,
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
26
(
13
),
13390
13400
(
2019
).
19.
U. K.
Pata
,
Journal of Cleaner Production
187
,
770
779
(
2018
).
20.
W. C.
Lu
,
International journal of environmental research and public health
14
(
11
),
1436
(
2017
).
21.
C.
Işık
,
S.
Ongan
, and
D.
Özdemir
,
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
26
(
11
),
10846
10853
(
2019
).
22.
H.
Mahmood
,
M.
Tanveer
, and
M.
Furqan
,
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
11
(
5
),
499
503
(
2021
).
23.
H.
Mahmood
,
T. T. Y.
Alkhateeb
,
M.
Tanveer
, and
D. H.
Mahmoud
,
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
18
(
14
),
7334
(
2021
).
24.
S. K.
Hundie
and
M. D.
Daksa
,
Journal of Economic Structures
8
(
1
),
1
21
(
2019
).
25.
W. J.
Huang
,
Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research
9
,
333
339
(
2020
).
26.
U.
Al-mulali
,
H. G.
Fereidouni
,
J. Y.
Lee
, and
C. N. Che
Sab
,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
22
,
209
222
(
2013
).
27.
S.
Iqbal
,
A. R.
Bilal
,
M.
Nurunnabi
,
W.
Iqbal
,
Y.
Alfakhri
, and
N.
Iqbal
,
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
28
(
15
),
19008
19020
(
2021
).
28.
G.
Soava
,
A.
Mehedintu
,
M.
Sterpu
, and
E.
Grecu
,
Energies
14
(
9
),
2394
(
2021
).
29.
H.
Güler
,
Ö.
Haykır
, and
S.
Öz
,
The Electricity Journal
35
,
107144
(
2022
).
30.
S.
Nižetić
,
International Journal of Energy Research
44
(
13
),
10953
10961
(
2020
).
31.
L.
Zhang
,
H.
Li
,
W. J.
Lee
, and
H.
Liao
,
Sustainable Production and Consumption
27
,
2134
2152
(
2021
).
32.
FRED
(
2022
), WWW document, (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/)
33.
U.S. Energy Information Administration
(
2022
),
Monthly Energy Review April 2022
, WWW document, (https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/index.php)
34.
H.
Tong
,
Threshold Models in Non-linear Time Series Analysis
(
Springer
,
New York
,
1983
).
35.
H.
Tong
,
Non-linear Time Series: A Dynamical System Approach
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
1990
).
36.
International Monetary Fund
(
2022
),
Policy Responses to COVID-19
, WWW document, (https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.