In injection molding, process efficiency and part quality are the most crucial parameters for a successful production. Economic efficiency is influenced by both of them, often with opposed effects. Polymer engineers and mold makers have to find the most economical process configuration. This includes part and mold design, machine and polymer selection and process settings. Mold temperature control is an essential part of the injection molding process having an impact on cooling time, surface quality and inner structure [1]. Beside mold temperature, thermal conductivity of the mold material is a relevant factor. Mold materials for serial production are available with thermal conductivity in the range of 15 W/mK to above 150 W/mK [2,3]. Materials with high thermal conductivity are limited when it comes to processing of reinforced polymers, due to low mechanical properties. Therefore, mold steels with high thermal conductivity in the range of 40 W/mK to 65 W/mK come into consideration. As these mold steels are priced about 7 times higher than conventional mold steels, industry has doubts regarding its application. Therefore, a mold steel of high thermal conductivity is compared to a conventional mold steel. In the study, cycle time using conventional mold temperature control and dynamic mold temperature control [4] was investigated. Furthermore, part quality of semicrystalline thermoplastics such as polyamide, were analyzed. It can be observed that cycle time can be reduced significantly in every mode of mold temperature control. The influence of mold steel thermal conductivity on part properties is relatively low when processing semicrystalline thermoplastics. Therefore, it is worth performing a calculation of part costs in detail, taking mold costs and cycle time into account.

1.
Yun
Zhang
and
Huamin
Zhou
: Cooling Simulation in
Computer Modeling for Injection Molding
, edited by
Huamin
Zhou.
Wiley
(
2013
), p.
129
.
2.
K. Prashanth
Reddy
and
Bhramara
Panitapu
:
High thermal conductivity mold insert material for cooling time reduction in thermoplastic injection molds
.
Materials Today: Proceedings
4
,
519
526
(
2017
).
3.
Yao
Liu
:
Heat Transfer Process between Polymer and Cavity Wall during Injection Molding.
Dissertation,
TU Chemnitz
,
Chemnitz
(
2014
), p.
26
.
4.
Fabian
Jasser
,
Michael
Stricker
,
Simone
Lake
and
Fabian
Kurz
:
Improved Heat Transfer for Fluid-Based Dynamic Temperature Controlled Injection Molds
.
Proceedings of PPS-36
. (accepted for publication).
5.
Arthur E.
Bergles
and
Raj M.
Manglik
:
Current Progress and new developments in enhanced heat and mass transfer
.
J Enh Heat Transf
20
,
1
15
(
2013
).
6.
Michael
Stricker
:
Methoden und Kennwerte für die Auslegung und den Betrieb von Temperiersystemen in Spritzgießwerkzeugen.
Dissertation
JKU Linz
,
Linz
(
2015
), p.
17
.
7.
Fabian
Jasser
,
Michael
Stricker
and
Simone
Lake
:
Optimized Heat Transfer in Injection Molds and its Influence on Demolding Temperature and Part Quality
.
Proceedings of PPS-37.
(accepted for publication).
8.
Michael
Stricker
and
Simone
Lake
:
Coole Typen für eine effiziente Werkzeugtemperierung
.
Kunststoffe
110
,
27
29
(
2020
).
9.
Markus
Baum
,
Fabian
Jasser
,
Michael
Stricker
,
Denis
Anders
and
Simone
Lake
:
Numerical Simulation of the Mold Filling Process and its Experimental Validation
.
Int. J Adv Manuf Technol
120
,
3065
3076
(
2022
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.