NASA has completed a preliminary mission and systems study of nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) systems for “split‐sprint” human exploration and related robotic cargo missions to Mars. This paper describes the study, the mission architecture selected, the NEP system and technology development needs, proposed development schedules, and estimated development costs. Since current administration policy makers have delayed funding for key technology development activities that could make Mars exploration missions a reality in the near future, NASA will have time to evaluate various alternate mission options, and it appears prudent to ensure that Mars mission plans focus on astronaut and mission safety, while reducing costs to acceptable levels. The split‐sprint nuclear electric propulsion system offers trip times comparable to nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems, while providing mission abort opportunities that are not possible with “reference” mission architectures. Thus, NEP systems offer short transit times for the astronauts, reducing the exposure of the crew to intergalactic cosmic radiation. The high specific impulse of the NEP system, which leads to very low propellant requirements, results in significantly lower “initial mass in low earth orbit” (IMLEO). Launch vehicle packaging studies show that the NEP system can be launched, assembled, and deployed, with about one less 240‐metric‐ton heavy lift launch vehicle (HLLV) per mission opportunity ‐ a very large cost savings! Technology development cost of the nuclear reactor for an NEP system would be shared with the proposed nuclear surface power systems, since nuclear systems will be required to provide substantial electrical power on the surface of Mars. The NEP development project plan proposed includes evolutionary technology development for nuclear electric propulsion systems that expands upon SP‐100 (Space Power ‐ 100 kw) technology that has been developed for lunar and Mars surface nuclear power, and small NEP systems for interplanetary probes. System upgrades are expected to evolve that will result in even shorter trip times, improved payload capabilities, and enhanced safety and reliability. Non‐nuclear technology development for the NEP system is estimated to cost about $721 M (1993 $). Nuclear technology development costs are not included in the costs in this report, since these costs will be incurred in the nuclear surface power development program. NEP Phase A/B studies are estimated to cost about $154 M. Flight system hardware development (Phase C/D) is estimated to cost about $2.8 B, and fabrication of flight hardware is estimated to be about $7.8 B for four mission opportunities in 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2016.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
,
Article navigation
1 July 1994
SPACE NUCLEAR POWER AND PROPULSION: Eleventh Symposium
9–13 January 1994
Albuquerque, New Mexico (USA)
Research Article|
July 01 1994
Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars
John S. Clark;
John S. Clark
NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey A. George;
Jeffrey A. George
NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Leon P. Gefert;
Leon P. Gefert
NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael P. Doherty;
Michael P. Doherty
NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert J. Sefcik
Robert J. Sefcik
NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135
Search for other works by this author on:
John S. Clark
Jeffrey A. George
Leon P. Gefert
Michael P. Doherty
Robert J. Sefcik
NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135
AIP Conf. Proc. 301, 7–21 (1994)
Citation
John S. Clark, Jeffrey A. George, Leon P. Gefert, Michael P. Doherty, Robert J. Sefcik; Nuclear Electric Propulsion: A “Better, Safer, Cheaper” Transportation System for Human Exploration of Mars. AIP Conf. Proc. 1 July 1994; 301 (1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2950272
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
27
Views
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Related Content
Nuclear Thermal Rocket/Stage Technology Options for NASA's Future Human Exploration Missions to the Moon and Mars
AIP Conf. Proc. (July 1994)
“Bimodal” NTR and LANTR propulsion for human missions to Mars/Phobos
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 1999)
Packaging and deployment of a 5.5 MWe potassium—Rankine nuclear electric propulsion spacecraft
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 1993)
‘‘Fast track’’ lunar NTR systems assessment for NASA’s first lunar outpost and its evolvability to Mars
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 1993)
Manned mars mission enhancements using Pratt & Whitney escort combined propulsion and power system
AIP Conf. Proc. (January 1999)