Companies in the manufacturing industry are facing the challenges of both reducing energy costs as well as driving decarbonization. As a result, energy efficiency optimization of factory operations is gaining importance. Due to their high share in the energy consumption of a factory, industrial supply technology is of interest for these optimizations. Particularly cooling systems used in factories often offer considerable potential for energy efficiency improvements, some of which can be realized through optimized control strategies. Optimization based on control technology in particular requires a high level of energy consumption transparency in order to identify potentials and measure efficiency improvements. However, industrial supply systems are often complex and interconnected facilities composed of a combination of various individual assets. Consequently, the energy efficiency monitoring and analysis of such systems typically require a high manual effort. To reduce this effort, we propose the development of a modular system model which decomposes complex, interconnected energy systems to individual, recurring assets. The system model consists of a standardized data exchange format, a standardization of structural and behavioral models in the form of a model library for industrial supply systems at different hierarchy levels, and a standardized interface for using the data model on a target platform such as an energy management software. The data model of the data exchange format maps data points such as the control and media interfaces as well as energy performance indicators of the individual assets in a standardized and consistent way. Similar to the concept of digital twins, the knowledge of manufacturers and operators about the system is to be seamlessly combined and utilized. By connecting the interfaces of the individual asset models, an aggregate structural model of a factory supply system is built. The aggregate structural model enables the calculation of consistent and comparative energy performance indicators at equipment and system level. In this way, the implementation of energy efficiency monitoring and the assessment of energy efficiency potentials and improvements is facilitated. The system model concept is demonstrated using an industrial cooling system comprising individual assets such as a cooling tower, a chiller and pumps.

1.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI)
, “
VDI 4661:2014, Energetic characteristics Fundamentals-methodology
,” (
2014
).
2.
K.
Bunse
,
M.
Vodicka
,
P.
Schönsleben
,
M.
Brülhart
, and
F. O.
Ernst
, “
Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management-gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
19
,
667
679
(
2011
).
3.
M.
Schulze
,
H.
Nehler
,
M.
Ottosson
, and
P.
Thollander
, “
Energy management in industry-a systematic review of previous findings and an integrative conceptual framework
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
112
,
3692
3708
(
2016
).
4.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
, “
ISO 50006:2014, Energy management systems-Measuring energy performance using energy baselines (EnB) and energy performance indicators (EnPI)-General principles and guidance
,” (
2014
).
5.
G. A.
Boyd
, “
Estimating plant level energy efficiency with a stochastic frontier
,”
The Energy Journal
29
,
23
43
(
2008
).
6.
L.-T.
Reiche
,
M.
Runge
,
K.-H.
Niemann
, and
A.
Fay
, “
Communication of energy data in automation systems
,” (
2021
).
7.
E.
Abele
,
N.
Panten
, and
B.
Menz
, “
Data collection for energy monitoring purposes and energy control of production machines
,”
Procedia CIRP
29
,
299
304
(
2015
),
the 22nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering
.
8.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI), “VDI 5600-6:2017, Manufacturing execution systems (MES). Energy management with MES
,” (
2017
).
9.
L.
Wurster
,
G.
Thiele
,
C.
Briese
, and
J.
Krüger
, “
On the selection and application of a convenient energy management software for industrial purposes
,”
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
1140
(
2021
).
10.
F. M.
Kanchiralla
,
N.
Jalo
,
S.
Johnsson
,
P.
Thollander
, and
M.
Andersson
, “
Energy end-use categorization and performance indicators for energy management in the engineering industry
,”
Energies
13
(
2020
), .
11.
K.
Grabowski
,
K.
Kubin
,
C.
Ernst
,
S.
Diehl
, and
J.
Melsheimer
, “
Methodik zur Aufstellung von Energiekennzahlen
,” (
2015
).
12.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
, “
ISO22400 Automation systems and integration — Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management — Part 2: Definitions and descriptions. Amendment 1: Key performance indicators for energy management
,” (
2017
).
13.
G.
May
,
M.
Taisch
,
V.
Prabhu
, and
I.
Barletta
, “
Energy related key performance indicators-state of the art, gaps and industrial needs
,” (
2013
).
14.
C.
Liebl
,
R. S.
Popp
, and
M. F.
Zaeh
, “
Approach for a systematic energy data generation and evaluation
,”
Procedia CIRP
67
,
63
68
(
2018
),
11th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering
, 19-21 July 2017,
Gulf of Naples, Italy
.
15.
T.
Linnenberg
,
A.
Müller
,
L.
Christiansen
,
C.
Seitz
, and
A.
Fay
, “
Ontoenergy-a lightweight ontology for supporting energy-efficiency tasks: Enabling generic evaluation of energy efficiency in the engineering phase of automated manufacturing plants
,”
IC3K 2013; KEOD 2013-5th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development, Proceedings
,
337
344
(
2013
).
16.
L.-T.
Reiche
,
A.
Markaj
, and
A.
Fay
, “
Energy management in modular production
,” in
2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA )
(
2021
) pp.
01
04
.
17.
G.
Thiele
,
N.
Khorsandi
, and
J.
Krüger
, “
Energy efficiency optimization using automationml modeling and an enpi methodology
,”
2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)
,
1218
1221
(
2019
).
18.
J.
Sinnemann
, “
Methodik zur effizienten Energiesimulation von automatisierten Produktionsanlagen in der virtuellen Inbetriebnahme
,” (
2021
).
19.
D.
Fuhrländer-Völker
,
F.
Borst
,
L.
Theisinger
,
H.
Ranzau
, and
M.
Weigold
, “
Modular data model for energy-flexible cyber-physical production systems
,”
Procedia CIRP
107
,
215
220
(
2022
),
leading manufacturing systems transformation-Proceedings of the 55th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2022
.
20.
M.
Seidenschnur
,
A.
Kücükavci
,
E.
Fjerbæk
,
K.
Smith
,
P.
Pauwels
, and
C.
Hviid
, “
A common data environment for hvac design and engi-neering
,”
Automation in Construction
142
,
104500
(
2022
).
21.
J. F.
Gülich
,
Centrifugal Pumps
(
Springer International Publishing
,
2020
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.