This paper aims to analyze the requirements and leading aspects to be considered in the design of virtual labs for engineering courses. We propose a framework to meet the requirements of virtual lab activities, integrating didactic and research purposes with the Digital Twin as enabling technology. The framework is the result of the analysis of the technical aspects of using immersive technologies as Extended Reality, together with the experiences collected from interviews and pilot testing in workshops with students, teachers, and lab managers of three institutions implementing the virtual lab concept. The results of this study are part of the Erasmus+ Virtual Labs for Digital Engineering Education (VirLaDEE) project, developing interconnected digital twins of physical engineering labs for quality and inclusive engineering education through state-of-the-art virtual technologies.

1.
W.
Terkaj
and
T.
Tolio
, “The italian flagship project: Factories of the future,” in
Factories of the Future: The Italian Flagship Initiative
, edited by
T.
Tolio
,
G.
Copani
, and
W.
Terkaj
(
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
,
2019
) pp.
3
35
.
3.
M.
Grieves
and
J.
Vickers
, “Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems,” in
Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems: New Findings and Approaches
, edited by
F.-J.
Kahlen
,
S.
Flumerfelt
, and
A.
Alves
(
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
,
2017
) pp.
85
113
.
4.
S.
Sezgin
and
N. Sevim
Cirak
, “
The role of moocs in engineering education: An exploratory systematic review of peer-reviewed literature
,”
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
29
,
950
968
(
2021
).
5.
M.
Urgo
,
W.
Terkaj
,
M.
Mondellini
, and
G.
Colombo
, “
Design of serious games in engineering education: An application to the configuration and analysis of manufacturing systems
,”
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
36
,
172
184
(
2022
).
6.
K.
Mahmood
,
T.
Otto
,
V.
Kuts
,
W.
Terkaj
,
G. E.
Modoni
,
M.
Urgo
,
G.
Colombo
,
G.
Heidegger
, p. Kovacs, and J. Stahre, “
Advancement in production engineering education through virtual learning factory toolkit concept
,”
Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences
70
,
374
382
(
2021
).
7.
S.
Deniz
,
U. C.
Müller
,
I.
Steiner
, and
T.
Sergi
, “
Online (remote) teaching for laboratory based courses using “digital twins” of the experi-ments
,”
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
144
,
051016
(
2022
).
8.
V.
Potkonjak
,
M.
Gardner
,
V.
Callaghan
,
P.
Mattila
,
C.
Guetl
,
V. M.
Petrović
, and
K.
Jovanović
, “
Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review
,”
Computers & Education
95
,
309
327
(
2016
).
9.
A. Mejías
Borrero
and
J. Andújar
Márquez
, “
A pilot study of the effectiveness of augmented reality to enhance the use of remote labs in electrical engineering education
,”
Journal of science education and technology
21
,
540
557
(
2012
).
10.
J. A.
di Lanzo
,
A.
Valentine
,
F.
Sohel
,
A. Y. T.
Yapp
,
K. C.
Muparadzi
, and
M.
Abdelmalek
, “
A review of the uses of virtual reality in engineering education
,”
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
28
,
748
763
(
2020
).
12.
B. Stahre
Wästberg
,
T.
Eriksson
,
G.
Karlsson
,
M.
Sunnerstam
,
M.
Axelsson
, and
M.
Billger
, “
Design considerations for virtual laboratories: A comparative study of two virtual laboratories for learning about gas solubility and colour appearance
,”
Education and Information Technologies
24
,
2059
2080
(
2019
).
13.
J.
Biggs
and
C.
Tang
,
Teaching for Quality Learning at University
(
2011
).
14.
M.
Grieves
, “
Origins of the digital twin concept
,” (
2016
), .
15.
M.
Singh
,
R.
Srivastava
,
E.
Fuenmayor
,
V.
Kuts
,
Y.
Qiao
,
N.
Murray
, and
D.
Devine
, “
Applications of digital twin across industries: A review
,”
Applied Sciences
12
(
2022
), .
16.
F.
Berardinucci
,
G.
Colombo
,
M.
Lorusso
,
M.
Manzini
,
W.
Terkaj
, and
M.
Urgo
, “
A learning workflow based on an integrated digital toolkit to support education in manufacturing system engineering
,”
Journal of Manufacturing Systems
63
,
411
423
(
2022
).
18.
C. P.
Nielsen
and
F.
Yu
, “
Product design for matrix-structured manufacturing systems
,”
Procedia CIRP
109
,
407
412
(2022),
32nd CIRP Design Conference (CIRP Design
2022
)-Design in a changing world.
19.
V.
Kuts
,
J. A.
Marvel
,
M.
Aksu
,
S. L.
Pizzagalli
,
M.
Sarkans
,
Y.
Bondarenko
, and
T.
Otto
, “
Digital twin as industrial robots manipulation validation tool
,”
Robotics
11
(
2022
).
20.
E.
Villagrossi
,
N.
Pedrocchi
, and
M.
Beschi
, “
Simplify the robot programming through an action-and-skill manipulation framework
,” in
2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)
(
2021
) pp.
1
6
.
21.
G.
Nicola
,
E.
Villagrossi
, and
N.
Pedrocchi
, “
Human-robot co-manipulation of soft materials: enable a robot manual guidance using a depth map feedback
,” in
2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)
(
2022
) pp.
498
504
.
22.
H.
Jalo
,
H.
Pirkkalainen
,
O.
Torro
,
E.
Pessot
,
A.
Zangiacomi
, and
A.
Tepljakov
, “
Extended reality technologies in small and medium-sized european industrial companies: level of awareness, diffusion and enablers of adoption
,”
Virtual Reality
26
,
1745
1761
(
2022
).
23.
T.
Tolio
,
G.
Copani
, and
W.
Terkaj
, “Key Research Priorities for Factories of the Future—Part II: Pilot Plants and Funding Mechanisms,” in
Factories of the Future: The Italian Flagship Initiative
, edited by
T.
Tolio
,
G.
Copani
, and
W.
Terkaj
(
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
,
2019
) pp.
475
494
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.