Indonesia is a developing country with the main problems, namely poverty, and one of the problems faced by each province. The government continues to strive to overcome this poverty problem and create a prosperous community condition by providing assistance programs for poverty alleviation. MADM methods that are used to evaluate the socio-economic condition of the family are Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Multi-Objective Optimization Method by Ratio Analysis (MOORA) involving 15 socio- economic indicators. The result showed that the recommended alternative sequences are not significantly different in evaluating alternatives using the SAW, TOPSIS, and MOORA methods.

1.
E.
Budiman
,
N.
Dengen
,
Haviluddin
, and
W.
Indrawan
, “
Integrated multi criteria decision making for a destitute problem
,”
Proceeding - 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology: Theory and Application of IT for Education, Industry and Society in Big Data Era, ICSITech 2017
, vol.
2018
- Janua, pp.
342
347
,
2018
, doi: .
2.
J. A.
Talingdan
, “
Performance comparison of different classification algorithms for household poverty classification
,”
Proceedings - 2019 4th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering, ICISE 2019
, pp.
11
15
,
2019
, doi: .
3.
M.
Wati
,
M.
Rizal
,
A.
Tejawati
,
E.
Budiman
, and
N.
Novirasari
, “
Management Information System: Socio-economic Welfare Criteria of the Residents
,”
International Conference on Creative Economics, Tourism and Information Management
, no. January, pp.
5
9
,
2020
, doi: .
4.
A.
Adji
and
S.
Hartini
, “
Indonesia Poverty Reduction Strategies: Shifting policies to promote employment in the poorest four deciles
,”
Economics and Finance in Indonesia (EFI)
, vol.
63
, no.
1
, pp.
13
37
,
2017
, doi: .
5.
M.
Wati
,
B.
Cahyono
, and
M. B.
Firdaus
, “
Evaluation of Poverty Society for Social Assistance Recipients using PROMETHEE Method Based on Entropy Weight
,”
Proceedings - 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology: Internet of Things for Industry, EIConCIT 2018
, pp.
197
202
,
2018
, doi: .
6.
I.
Halimatusa’diyah
, “
Zakat and Social Protection: The Relationship Between Socio-religious CSOs and the Government in Indonesia
,”
Journal of Civil Society
, vol.
11
, no.
1
, pp.
79
99
,
2015
, doi: .
7.
R. A.
Kasri
, “
Effectiveness of Zakah Targeting In Alleviating Poverty in Indonesia
,”
Al-IQTISHAD: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah (Journal of Islamic Economics)
, vol.
8
, no. July, pp.
169
186
,
2016
, doi: .
8.
M.
Saputra
,
O. S.
Sitompul
, and
P.
Sihombing
, “
Comparison AHP and SAW to promotion of head major department SMK Muhammadiyah 04 Medan
,”
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
, vol.
1007
, no.
1
,
2018
, doi: .
9.
B. S. Br
Sembiring
,
M.
Zarlis
,
Sawaluddin
,
A.
Agusnady
, and
T.
Qowidho
, “
Comparison of SMART and SAW Methods in Decision Making
,”
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
, vol.
1255
, no.
1
,
2019
, doi: .
10.
A. I.
Lubis
,
P.
Sihombing
, and
E. B.
Nababan
, “
Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making
,”
MECnIT 2020 - International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology
, pp.
127
131
,
2020
, doi: .
11.
M.
Wati
,
H. S.
Pakpahan
, and
N.
Novirasari
, “
Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Student Degree Completion Time based on Entropy Weighted
,”
Proceedings of ICAITI 2018 - 1st International Conference on Applied Information Technology and Innovation: Toward A New Paradigm for the Design of Assistive Technology in Smart Home Care
, pp.
56
61
,
2019
, doi: .
12.
P. I.
Ciptayani
and
K. C.
Dewi
, “
Decision support system of e-book provider selection for library using Simple Additive Weighting
,”
The 2nd International Joint Conference on Science and Technology (IJCST)
2017
, vol.
953
, pp.
1
8
,
2017
, doi: .
13.
M.
Mouad
and
L.
Cherkaoui
, “
A comparison between fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy GRA for the vertical handover decision making
,”
2017 Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision, ISCV 2017
,
2017
, doi: .
14.
Mauladi
,
P. E. P.
Utomo
,
B. F.
Hutabarat
, and
R. A.
Putra
, “
Decision Support System to Determine Uang Kuliah Tunggal (UKT) by Combining Naïve Bayes Classifier and Fuzzy-TOPSIS
,”
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
, vol.
1566
, no.
1
,
2020
, doi: .
15.
A. v.
Demidovskij
, “
Comparative Analysis of MADM Approaches: ELECTRE, TOPSIS and Multi-level LDM Methodology
,”
2020 XXIII International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM
), pp.
190
193
,
2020
, doi: .
16.
M.
Wati
,
N.
Novirasari
,
E.
Budiman
, and
Haeruddin
, “
Multi-criteria decision-making for evaluation of student academic performance based on objective weights
,”
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2018
, no.
11
, pp.
1
5
,
2018
, doi: .
17.
D.
Hanifatulqolbi
,
I. E.
Ismail
,
J.
Hammad
, and
M. H.
Al-Hooti
, “
Decision support system for considering the best teacher performance using MOORA method
,”
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
, vol.
1193
, no.
1
,
2019
, doi: .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.