Creativity, as one of the important skills of the 21st century, can perform in knowledge and psychomotor skill, known as creative performance. Creative performance is the ability to integrate multiples knowledge collaboratively and exchange ideas uniquely in a discipline that requires cross-disciplinary skills. Knowledge includes several aspects: novelty, resolution, elaboration, and synthesis. Students need creative performance in dealing with social problems around them. Teachers must measure students’ creative performance to determine learning strategies that suit student needs. The research objective is to describe the creative performance profile of 7th-grade junior high school students in science learning about alternative energy. The research method used is interviews with junior high school science teachers regarding students’ creative performance about alternative energy in science learning. The results showed that creative performance means the score is 31.68 (low). The lowest indicator is elaboration and synthesis (22.73). 3 of 5 teachers have not led an increase in creative performance in science learning. Limited use of media in learning, direct learning time, and economic conditions is affected teachers learning strategies. Students’ creative performance needs to be improved using appropriate learning approaches, methods, models, materials, and media. Science learning that provides opportunities for students to design their products can be the primary key to improving creative performance.

1.
A.
Oktarina
et al,
Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini
12
(
1
),
31
40
(
2021
).
2.
J.
Massonnié
et al,
Front. Psychol.
10
,
1
12
(
2019
).
3.
M. M. E. I.
Bali
and
L.
Munawwaroh
,
J. Basicedu
6
(
3
),
4154
4162
(
2022
).
4.
S.
Besemer
and
K.
O’quin
,
J. Creat. Behav.
20
(
2
),
115
126
(
1986
).
5.
D. J.
Trefinger
,
J. Creat. Behav.
15
(
3
),
158
178
(
1981
).
6.
Y.
Shin
,
M.
Kim
, and
S. H.
Lee
,
J. Bus. Psychol.
32
(
6
),
655
671
(
2017
).
7.
Y. S.
Chang
et al,
J. Educ. Technol.
48
(
1
),
101
112
(
2017
).
8.
J. C.
Hong
,
J. H.
Ye
, and
J. Y.
Fan
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
15
(
9
), (
2019
).
9.
D. A.
Mahmudah
,
U.
Cahyana
, and
A.
Purwanto
, “The effect of mobile learning media and scientific reasoning on creative thinking,” in
AIP Conference Proceedings
(
AIP Publishing
,
2021
). .
10.
A.
Farhan
et al, “Students’ creative thinking skills and impact on learning outcomes in physics laboratory II academic using the learning model project-based,” in
AIP Conference Proceedings
(
AIP Publishing
,
2021
). .
11.
Z.
Shafait
et al,
Sustainability (Switzerland)
13
(
5
),
1
19
(
2021
).
12.
M. H. I.
Al-Muhdhar
et al,“Improvement of creative thinking skills and environmental literacy through the e-module of surrounding nature exploration,” in
AIP Conference Proceedings
(
AIP Publishing
,
2021
). .
13.
J. A.
Greene
,
R.
Freed
, and
R. K.
Sawyer
,
Instructional Science
47
(
2
),
127
149
(
2019
).
14.
H. L.
Ballard
,
C. G. H.
Dixon
, and
E. M.
Harris
,
Biol. Conserv.
208
,
65
75
(
2017
).
15.
O.
Kombeiz
and
A.
Steidle
,
Ergonomics
61
(
3
),
456
463
(
2018
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.