This paper aims to analyze internal and external factors and formulate a development strategy for corn-goats integration technology. The location of RPIK study was carried out in Deli Serdang Regency from June to December 2021. Interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), observation, and documentation were employed in the data-gathering process. SWOT analysis was used to assess the data that was obtained. The study’s findings demonstrated that the corn-goat integration technique, which is based on the internal matrix factor showed a positive (+) value greater strengths (S) 1.34 than weaknesses (W) 0.09. The external factor matrix shows that the opportunities value (O) is 1.35 greater than the value of the threats (T) is 1.26. Determination of the appropriate strategy, namely by implementing a Strategy (SO) utilizing corn biomass for feed and providing technical support in the form of (silage, hay, complete feed), an integrated corn-goat farming system for commercial use, utilization of urine and solid goat manure as organic fertilizer, multiply legumes and superior grasses, introduce good and correct procedures for feeding, reproduction, and placement of livestock in cages, form cooperatives, institutions and partnerships between corn farmers and goat farmer.

Topics
Bioacoustics of mammals, Biomass energy sources, Biofluids, Interviews
1.
Ministry of Agriculture
, “
Inilah 10 provinsi produsen jagung terbesar Indonesia
” (
2021
).
2.
M.
Havena
 and
L.
Marlina
,
J. Saintech Transf.
,
1
(
1
),
27
–
32
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.32734/jst.v1i1.239
Google Scholar
 
3.
S.
Purwanto
, “
Perkembangan produksi dan kebijakan dalam peningkatan produksi jagung
” (
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
4.
Commodity Futures Trading Authority, Harga komoditi di tingkat petani
(
2022
), available at http://infoharga.bappebti.go.id/harga_komoditi_petani/?wilayah=&komoditi=K0002.
5.
Z.
Bunyamin
 and
M.
Aqil
, “Evaluasi potensi biomas dan hasil varietas unggul jagung nasional”,
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Membangun Pertanian Modern dan Inovatif Berkelanjutan dalam rangka mendukung MEA
, (
BBP2TP
,
Bogor
,
2016
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
O.
Erenstein
,
A.
Samaddar
,
N.
Teufel
 and
M.
Bluemmel
,
Experim. Agric.
,
47
(
4
),
677
–
704
(
2011
).
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479711000433
Google Scholar
 
7.
J.H.
Shin
,
D.
Wang
,
S.C.
Kim
,
A.T.
Adesogan
 and
C.R.
Staples
,
J. Dairy Sci.
,
95
(
7
),
4006
–
4016
(
2012
).
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5121
Google Scholar
 
8.
E.I.
Riyanti
,
Jurnal Litbang Pertanian
28
(
3
),
101
–
110
(
2009
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
C.B.
Wilson
,
G.E.
Erickson
,
T.J.
Klopfenstein
,
R.J.
Rasby
,
D.C.
Adams
 and
G.
Rush
, “A review of corn stalk grazing on animal performance and crops yield”,
Nebraska Beef Cattle Report
(
2004
), pp.
13
–
15
.
Google Scholar
 
10.
J.
Sirati
,
N.D.
Purwantari
 and
K.
Simanihuruk
,
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner
10
(
3
),
175
–
181
(
2005
).
Google Scholar
 
11.
S.P.
Ginting
 and
A.
Tarigan
,
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner
11
(
4
),
273
–
279
(
2006
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
J.
McCutcheon
 and
D.
Samples
, “
Grazing corn residues
”,
Extension Fact Sheet, Ohio State University Extension, UC ANR
10
–
02
, (
2002
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
K.
Simanihuruk
,
J.
Sirait
 and
S.P.
Ginting
, “
Biomassa tanaman jagung sebagai pakan basal kambing Boerka sedang tumbuh
”,
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner Virtual
(
2020
), pp.
774
.
Google Scholar
 
14.
B.
Tangendjaja
 and
E.
Wina
, “Limbah tanaman dan produk samping industri jagung untuk pakan” in
Jagung
(
Puslitbang Tanaman Pangan
,
2007
), pp.
427
–
455
.
Google Scholar
 
15.
Sugiyono
,
Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D
(
Alfabeta
,
Bandung
,
2013
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
J.W.
Cresswell
,
Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed
(
PT. Pustaka Pelajar
,
Yogyakarta
,
2010
).
Google Scholar
 
17.
F.
Rangkuti
,
Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis
(
PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
,
Jakarta
,
2017
).
Google Scholar
 
18.
E.
Gurel
 and
M.
Tat
,
J. Int. Soc. Res.
10
,
994
–
1006
(
2017
).
https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832
Google Scholar
 
19.
BPS
,
Sumatera Utara dalam Angka 2020, The Central Bureau of Statistics, North Sumatra Province
(
2020
).
20.
F.W.A.W.
Sari
 and
R.H.B.
Bangun
,
Agroland: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pertanian
26
(
3
),
198
–
211
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
21.
E.
Handayani
,
K.
Saleh
 and
E.
Panggabean
,
Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian (JIPERTA)
,
1
(
2
),
163
–
174
(
2019
).
https://doi.org/10.31289/jiperta.v1i2.65
Google Scholar
 
22.
Sunanto
 and
Nasrullah
, “
Kajian model pertanian zero waste dengan pendekatan sistem integrasi tanaman jagung - ternak sapi di Sulawesi Selatan
”,
Prosiding Insinas
(
2012
), pp.
223
–
228
.
Google Scholar
 
23.
S.
Hasan
,
N.
Pomalingo
 and
S.
Bahri
, “
Pendekatan dan strategi pengembangan sistem pertanian terintegrasi ternak-tanaman menuju ketahanan pangan nasional
”,
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Integrated Farming System
(
2018
), pp.
1
–
9
.
Google Scholar
 
24.
T.E.
Susilorini
,
Kuswati
,
R.D.
Wahyuni
,
P.
Surjowardojo
 and
Suyadi
,
AGRIVITA J. Agric. Sci.
44
(
2
),
344
–
354
(
2022
).
Google Scholar
 
25.
A.S.
Channabasavanna
,
D.P.
Biradar
,
K.N.
Prabhudev
, and
M.
Hegde
,
Karnataka J. Agric. Sci.
22
(
1
),
25
–
27
(
2009
).
Google Scholar
 
26.
A.S.
Chaudry
,
Rev. Bras. Zootec.
37
,
78
–
84
(
2008
).
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300010
Google Scholar
 
27.
D.
Polakitan
,
Pastura
2
(
2
),
70
–
73
(
2012
).
Google Scholar
 
28.
K.
Kurhartono
 and
N.
Iriani
, “Prospek pengembangan tanaman jagung sebagai sumber hijauan pakan ternak”,
Prosiding Temu Teknis Fungsional Non Peneliti
(
2003
), pp.
26
–
31
.
Google Scholar
 
29.
M.A.
Bal
,
R.D.
Shaver
,
A.G.
Jirovec
,
K.J.
Shinners
 and
J.G.
Coors
,
J. Dairy Sci.
83
(
6
),
1264
–
1273
(
2000
).
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74993-9
Google Scholar
 
30.
J.M.
Neylon
 and
L. Kung
Jr
,
J. Dairy Sci.
86
(
6
),
2163
–
2169
(
2003
).
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73806-5
Google Scholar
 
31.
T.W.J.
Keady
, “Ensiled maize and whole crop wheat forages for beef and dairy cattle: Effects on animal performance,” in
Silage Production and Utilization,
edited by
R. S.
Park
 and
M. D.
Stronge
 (
Wageningen Academic Publ
.,
The Netherlands
,
2005
), pp.
65
–
82
.
Google Scholar
 
32.
N.
Saking
 and
N.
Qomariyah
, “Identifikasi hijauan makanan ternak (HMT) lokal mendukung produktivitas sapi potong di Sulawesi Selatan”,
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner
(
2017
), pp.
558
–
565
.
Google Scholar
 
33.
T.
Rahmawati
,
A.M.
Fuah
,
H.S.
Arifin
,
M.
Syukur
 and
Salundik
,
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science
387
012081
(
2019
).
Google Scholar
 
34.
S.H.T.
Shefat
,
A.
Rahman
,
M.A.
Chowdhuryl
 and
M.
Nasiruddin
,
Acta Scie. Agric.
,
2
(
12
),
112
–
118
(
2018
).
Google Scholar
 
35.
J.
Suh
,
Agric. Syst.
,
125
,
74
–
81
(
2014
).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.003
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
©2024 Authors. Published by AIP Publishing.
2024
Author(s)
You do not currently have access to this content.