Sustainable development of the human environment is inextricably linked with environmental issues, energy and resource conservation. An important factor in solving these issues on the world agenda is the reduction of gas emissions into the atmosphere, especially carbon monoxide emissions, the value of which is called the "carbon footprint". Buildings, structures and other capital construction projects are indirect emitters of carbon emissions. During their life cycle, they consume energy resources, the production of which is associated with the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Thus, a carbon footprint is formed during the life cycle. An important scientific and practical challenge is to reduce this carbon footprint. To account for the size of carbon footprint of buildings during the life cycle and to solve the problem of reducing it, it is necessary to create appropriate techniques, as well as their application in modern software products. Currently, the creation of such methods in the Russian Federation is under development, existing methods in world practice are based on European methods and databases. Russia has technological features of the production of energy resources, building materials, products and structures, on top of all of this the forming of construction and installation works and methods of operation of buildings. All this makes methodological adjustments to the calculation of the carbon footprint. In this article, the authors consider the existing methodological approaches to assessing the carbon footprint of the life cycle of buildings abroad and in Russia and come to the conclusion that the main methodological approach to its assessment is the life cycle analysis (LCA) method.

1.
J.
Huang
, et al, “
Building energy management and forecasting using artificial intelligence: Advance technique
,”
Computers and Electrical Engineering
99
,
107790
,
2022
.
2.
D. C. W.
Tsang
and
L.
Wang
,
Low Carbon Stabilization and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes
(
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam, Netherlands
,
2022
).
3.
M.
Kharun
, et al, “
Heat treatment of basalt fiber reinforced expanded clay concrete with increased strength for cast-in-situ construction
,”
Fibers
8
,
67
(
2020
).
4.
L.
Zhang
, et al, “
Internationalization trends of carbon emission linkages: A case study on the construction sector
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
270
(
21
),
122433
(
2020
).
5.
H.
Engel
, et al, “
Target net zero: A journey to decarbonizing the public sector
,”
McKinsey
(22 August
2022
).
6.
B.
Kroposki
, et al, “
Achieving a 100% renewable grid: Operating electric power systems with extremely high levels of variable renewable energy
,”
IEEE Power and Energy Magazine
15
(
2
),
61
73
(
2017
).
7.
S.
Pauliuk
,
K.
Sjöstrand
and
D.
Müller
, “
Transforming the Norwegian dwelling stock to reach the 2 degrees celsius climate target
,”
Journal of Industrial Ecology
17
(
4
),
542
554
(
2013
).
8.
M.
Kouhirostamkolaei
, et al, “
Analyzing the effect of materials’ selection on energy saving and carbon footprint: A case study simulation of concrete structure building
,”
Civil and Environmental Engineering
15
(
3
),
157
165
(
2021
).
9.
T.
Luo
, et al, “
Mapping the knowledge roadmap of low carbon building: A scientometric analysis
,”
Energy and Buildings
194
,
163
176
(
2019
).
10.
L. A.
Oparina
, “Theoretical foundations of the processes of organizing the life cycle of energy-efficient buildings,”
DSC Thesis
,
Ivanovo State Polytechnic University
,
Ivanovo, Russia
,
2016
.
11.
N.
Avlonas
and
George P.
Nassos
,
Practical Sustainability Strategies: How to Gain a Competitive Advantage
(
Wiley
,
New York, USA
,
2020
).
12.
A. G.
Tamrazyan
, et al, “
The degree of physical depreciation of buildings and structures
,”
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1687
,
012008
(
2020
).
13.
F.
Asdrubali
and
G.
Grazieschi
, “
Life cycle assessment of energy efficient buildings
,”
Energy Reports
6
(
8
),
270
285
(
2020
).
14.
R.
Watkins
, “Lifecycle analysis, carbon footprint, sustainability,” in
Sustainable Retail Refrigeration
, edited by
J. A.
Evans
and
A. M.
Foster
(
Wiley-Blackwell
,
Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
,
2013
).
15.
M.
Hematibahar
, et al, “
The prediction of compressive strength and compressive stress–strain of basalt fiber reinforced high-performance concrete using classical programming and logistic map algorithm
,”
Materials
15
(
19
),
6975
(
2022
).
16.
A.
Levasseur
, et al, “
Biogenic carbon and temporary storage addressed with dynamic life cycle assessment
,”
Journal of Industrial Ecology
17
(
1
),
117
128
(
2013
).
17.
J.
Mulrow
, et al, “
The state of carbon footprint calculators: An evaluation of calculator design and user interaction features
,”
Sustainable Production and Consumption
18
,
33
40
(
2019
).
18.
M. D.
Alba-Rodríguez
, et al, “Reducing energy poverty and carbon footprint of social housing projects,” in
Energy Poverty Alleviation
, edited by
C.
Rubio-Bellido
and
J.
Solis-Guzman
(
Springer, Cham
,
Switzerland
,
2022
), pp.
41
66
.
19.
J.
Budajová
, “
Carbon footprint of selected building structures
,”
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
1209
,
012015
(
2021
).
20.
R.
Watkins
and
S.
Tassou
, “Life cycle analysis of the environmental impact of different cabinet designs,” in
Proceeding of the 13th World Congress of Food Science & Technology: Food is Life
(
Nantes, France
,
2006
), pp.
663
671
.
21.
A.
Hasanzadeh
, et al, “
Prediction of the mechanical properties of basalt fiber reinforced high-performance concrete using machine learning techniques
,”
Materials
15
(
20
),
7165
(
2022
).
22.
How to measure your event’s carbon footprint
(
University of Minnesota Extension
, 10 August,
2022
).
23.
P.
Artuso
and
A.
Santiangeli
, “
Energy solutions for sports facilities
,”
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
33
(
12
),
3182
3187
(
2008
).
24.
S.
Ratner
, et al, “
What is stopping energy efficiency in Russia? Exploring the confluence of knowledge, negligence, and other social barriers in the Krasnodar Region
,”
Energy Research & Social Science
85
,
102412
(
2022
).
25.
G.
Yang
, et al, “
Response to the commentary on "A review of operating performance in green buildings: Energy use, indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction
" by
John H.
Scofield
,”
Energy and Buildings
194
,
366
368
(
2019
).
26.
N.
Vatin
, et al, “
Influence of formwork structure on heat treatment of precast concrete elements by solar energy
”,
Engineering Journal
25
(
2
),
161
173
(
2021
).
27.
2018 Global Status Report: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector
(
United Nations Environment Programme
,
Nairobi, Kenya
,
2018
).
28.
A.
Kashani
, et al, “
Thermal performance of calcium-rich alkali-activated materials: A microstructural and mechanical study
,”
Construction and Building Materials
153
,
225
237
(
2017
).
29.
D.
Bibalou
, et al, “
A carbon footprint study and a life cycle assessment of an identical refrigerated display cabinet: Comparative analysis of the respective ratios of embodied and operational impacts
,” in
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Life Cycle Approaches
(
Lille
,
France
,
2014
), pp.
225
237
.
30.
W.
Klöpffer
, “
The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA - An orientation in LCA methodology and application
,”
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
11
,
142
(
2006
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.