Process modelling has become an integral part of the field of civil engineering, especially due to the need to ensure a formal framework for the field. Due to the huge financial flows within the AECO industry and the importance of the industry, it is not possible to carry out individual processes on an ad hoc basis, but it is necessary to have them properly mapped - and this is exactly what the process models are for. Traditional modelling methodologies and tools are used for process modelling, especially BPMN. Despite the fact that this is a sophisticated and robust methodology, it turns out that it is not always appropriate, especially in cases where the use of the behavioral approach itself, i.e., the approach that perceives the process as a sequence of activities, fails. These are, for example, situations where we are not able to precisely define the sequence of individual activities. The behavioral approach also does not consider in-process measurement or continuous improvement, because it does not monitor any parameters, but only describes follow-up activities. It is therefore necessary to consider a different approach which would perceive the process other than as a simple sequence of actions and activities. One of the possible approaches is the state approach, which perceives the process as a transition between the initial and final state, or between individual intermediate states. This approach has been developed by the authors for several years, the application in the AECO industry is a logical application of the approach, which could mean its significant expansion, especially if the condition of improving software support for this approach to modelling is met. The state approach in the AECO industry has the potential to bring the possibility of effective process management, even those that pose a problem for behaviorally oriented methodologies. At the same time, it is possible to count on a tool that will enable the measurement and evaluation of processes, both individually and within statistical processing. This work provides basic considerations on how the state process can be incorporated into the AECO industry.

1.
R.
Alur
and
D. L.
Dill
, “
A theory of timed automata
”, in
Theoretical computer science
,
126
(
2
),
183
235
. (
1994
)
2.
J. F.
Aubry
and
N.
Brînzei
, N., “
Finite State Automaton
,” in
Systems Dependability Assessment
,
83
87
. (
2015
)
3.
J.
Becker
,
M.
Rosemann
and
C.
Von Uthmann
, “Guidelines of business process modelling,” in
Business Process Management
(pp.
30
49
).
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
. (
2000
)
4.
E.
Börger
, “
Approaches to modelling business processes: a critical analysis of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL
,” in
Software & Systems Modelling
,
11
(
3
),
305
318
. (
2012
)
5.
A. W. F.
Edwards
and
L. L.
Cavalli-Sforza
. “
A Method for Cluster Analysis
,” in
Biometrics
, vol.
21
, no.
2
,
1965
, pp.
362
375
. JSTOR, available from: www.jstor.org/stable/2528096. Accessed 31 Jan. 2021.
6.
J.
Kettenring
, “
The Practice of Cluster Analysis
,” in
Journal of Classification
23
,
3
30
(
2006
).
7.
J.
Myslín
, and
J.
Kaiser
, “
State based milestones in process modeling methods based on behavioral approach
,” in
Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth
, vols.
I-IX
, pp.
3598
3606
,
2017
.
8.
J.
Myslin
and
J.
Kaiser
, “
Philosophical and technical aspects of term “state
” in technical practice,” in:
Journal of Systems Integration
, Vol
9
, No
2
(
2018
)
9.
P.
Wohed
,
W. M.
van der Aalst
,
M.
Dumas
,
A. H. ter
Hofstede
and
N.
Russell
, “
On the suitability of BPMN for business process modelling
,” in
International conference on business process management
(pp.
161
176
).
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
. (
2006
)
10.
B.
Curtis
,
M. I.
Kellner
and
J.
Over
. “
Process modelling
,”
Communications of the ACM
35
.
9
(
1992
):
75
90
.
11.
M. I.
Kellner
, “
Multiple-paradigm approaches for software process modelling
.” in
7th International Software Process Workshop, Communication and Coordination in the Software Process.
IEEE Computer Society
, (
1991
).
12.
J.
Myslín
, “Process Framework of Information Modelling for BIM Execution Planning,” in:
Vision 2020: Innovation Management, Development Sustainability, and Competitive Economic Growth
.
Norristown
:
IBIMA
,
2016
. ISBN 978-0-9860419-8-3.
13.
J.
Myslín
,
USE OF PROCESS MODELLING IN THE FRAMEWORK OF POPULATION PROTECTION AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
,
MPA dissertation, Jagielonian college in Toruň
, (
2021
)
14.
K.
Prušková
, “
BIM technology and changes in traditional design process, reliability of data from related registers
,” in
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
960
(
3
),
2020
.
15.
Z.
Kramářová
and
K.
Prušková
, “
Brownfield database in light of the BIM method
,” in
MATEC Web of Conferences
279
(
2019
): 10th International Scientific Conference Building Defects (Building Defects 2018), vol. 279, 2019.
16.
K.
Prušková
, “
Reducing failures rate within the project documentation using Building Information Modelling, especially Level of Development
,” in
MATEC Web of Conferences
146
(
2018
): 9th International Scientific Conference Building Defects (Building Defects 2017), vol. 146, 2018.
17.
K.
Prušková
and
V.
Nývlt
, “
Issue of Building Information Modelling Implementation into the Czech Republic’s Legislation using the Level of Development
,” in
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
245
(
8
),
2017
.
18.
K.
Prušková
, “
Beginning of Real Wide us of BIM Technology in Czech Republic
,” in
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
471
(
10
),
2019
.
19.
V.
Nývlt
and
K.
Prušková
, “
Building Information Management as a Tool for Managing Knowledge throughout whole Building Life Cycle
,” in
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
245
(
4
),
2017
.
20.
V.
Nyvlt
and
R.
Novotny
, “
Ontology as a Tool for Building Life Cycle Modelling
,” in
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
,
471
,
2019
.
21.
V.
Nyvlt
and
R.
Novotny
, “
Sharing Knowledge and Information within BIM Life Cycle Processes
,” in
MATEC Web of Conferences
279
(
2019
): 10th International Scientific Conference Building Defects (Building Defects 2018), vol. 279, 2019.
22.
M.
Dedic
, “
Evaluation of the processes of creating a project documentation of an existing building using a 3D scanner
, ” in
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management
,
SGEM
, vol.
19
, Issue
2.2
, pp.
127
132
,
2019
.
23.
J.
Rádl
and
J.
Kaiser
. “
Information insufficiency problems in construction projects
,.” in
Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth
1
(
2017
):
5059
5070
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.