Building damages is increasingly recognised as a serious, economic and sustainability concern. A key aspect of building damage mitigation is understanding them. Severe and complex cases of building damages have been an object of research within SINTEF for decades. Insurance companies and building appraisers are performing a continuously growing amount of work on more common damages. Various lists of important checkpoints on buildings are flooding the internet, however, far too little attention has been paid to developing a comprehensive system for defining building damage risk spots. Well defined risk spots could be an effective tool for mitigating building damages. The aim of this research has therefore been to try and establish a framework for systematically generating, grouping, and labelling risk spots. This paper has been divided into three parts. The first part deals with defining risk spots in buildings, second part describes the methodology for identifying and classifying spots, last part comprise a case study where the methodology has been applied to a limited part of a building. Future studies on advancing the current topics by adding risk part, expressed as the probability of occurrence of these damages multiplied by their consequences, are recommended.

1.
B. S.
Blanchard
et al,
Maintainability: A Key to Effective Serviceability and Maintenance Management
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
1995
).
2.
BCA
,
Design for Maintainability.
Available at: www.bca.gov.sg (Accessed: 2019).
3.
FinanceNorge
,
Statistics of non-life insurance
(
2021
).
4.
M.
Laakso
and
A.
Kiviniemi
,
ITcon
17
,
134
161
(
2012
).
5.
BuildingSMART
,
Buildingsmart Data Dictionary.
Available at: https://www.buildingsmart.org/users/services/buildingsmart-data-dictionary/ (Accessed: 2022).
6.
ISURV
,
Building Defects Database.
Available at: https://www.isurv.com/ (Accessed: 2022).
7.
Y. L.
Chew
,
Maintainability of Facilities: Green FM for Building Professionals
(
World Scientific Publishing Company
,
2016
).
8.
A.-H.
Hamdan
et al, “An ontological model for the representation of damage to constructions,” in
7th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop
, edited by
M.
Poveda-Villalón
et al
(
CEUR-WS Team
,
Aachen, Germany
,
2019
), pp.
64
77
.
9.
A.
Hammad
et al, “
Towards unified ontology for modelling lifecycle inspection and repair information of civil infrastructure systems
,” in
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering
, (
Tampere, Finland
,
2018
), pp.
22
24
.
10.
ERA-LEARN
,
Project: Tall timber facades, identification of cost-effective and resilient envelopes for wood constructions.
Available at: https://www.era-learn.eu/network-information/networks/woodwisdom-net-1/ww-net-call-for-proposals/tall-timber-facades-identification-of-cost-effective-and-resilient-envelopes-for-wood-constructions (Accessed: February 14, 2022).
11.
T.
Ingvaldsen
, Prosjektrapport 163: Byggskadeomfanget i Norge.
Utbedringskostnader i norsk bygge-/eiendomsbransje - og erfaringer fra andre land
(
Norges byggforskningsinstitutt
,
Oslo, Norway
,
1994
). (in Norwegian)
12.
T.
Ingvaldsen
, Prosjektrapport 308: Skader på bygg.
Grunnlag for systematisk måling
(
Norges byggforskningsinstitutt
,
Oslo, Norway
,
2001
). (in Norwegian)
13.
J.
Mehus
et al, Prosjektrapport 379: Endring i byggekvalitet.
Kvantitativ registrering av byggskadeomfang. Sluttrapport
(
Norges byggforskningsinstitutt
,
Oslo, Norway
,
2004
). (in Norwegian)
14.
T.
Ingvaldsen
, Prosjektrapport 17: Byggskadeomfanget i Norge (2006).
En vurdering basert på et tidligere arbeid og nye data
(
SINTEF Byggforsk
,
Oslo, Norway
,
2008
). (in Norwegian)
15.
S.
Geving
,
Fuktskader: årsaker, utredning og tiltak
(
SINTEF akademisk forlag
,
Oslo, Norway
,
2011
). (in Norwegian)
16.
P.
Bjerkevoll
,
Ytterveggskonstruksjoner – Byggskadeanalyse
(
Prosjektoppgave, Institutt for bygg, anlegg og transport, NTNU
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
2004
). (in Norwegian)
17.
P.
Bjerkevoll
,
Klimapåkjenninger og prosessforårsakede byggskader
(
Masteroppgave, Institutt for bygg, anlegg og transport, NTNU
,
Trondheim, Norway
,
2005
). (in Norwegian)
18.
K. R.
Lisø
et al, “
The robustness of the Norwegian building stock - A review of process induced building defects
,” in
Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Building Physics in the Nordic Countries
(
The Icelandic Building Research Institute
,
Reykjavik, Iceland
,
2005
), pp.
1195
1202
.
19.
K. R.
Lisø
et al, “
Learning from experience–an analysis of process induced building defects in Norway
,” in
Research in Building Physics and Building Engineering – Proceedings of the 3rd International Building Physics Conference
, edited by
H. G.
Paul Fazio
et al
, (
Taylor & Francis Group
,
2006
,
London, United Kingdom
), pp.
425
432
.
20.
NS 3451:2009+A1:2019
,
Table of Building Elements
(
Standard Norge
,
Lysaker, Norway
,
2019
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.