Recently, with the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the use of automated evaluation in education has increased. Maintaining academic integrity is one of the most challenging aspects of higher education. Cheating is rampant in academic examinations and other forms of educational assessment. The vast majority of students believe that it is unethical to tolerate cheating; therefore, it is vital to devote a significant amount of effort to identifying and avoiding instances of cheating. Examining the student’s behavior is one way to determine whether they are engaged in cheating or not. This paper proposes a deep learning-based cheating detection system that can identify instances of students engaging in dishonest behavior. A YOLOv7 model is trained on a custom dataset collected from various resources. The dataset comprises two classes, i.e., cheating and not cheating, and 2565 images. Evaluation criteria like precision, F1 score, recall, and mAP (mean average precision) are used to validate the performance of the proposed model. The proposed model shows promising performance in categorizing the student’s visible actions into cheating or not cheating and achieved an overall [email protected] of 0.719. Overall, the proposed method can be utilized to reduce the error rate associated with human monitoring by alerting the proper authorities whenever unusual behavior is observed during academic tests.

1.
Y.
Khlifi
and
H. A.
El-Sabagh
.
2017
.
A novel authentication scheme for E-assessments based on student behavior over e-learning platform
.
International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning
12
,
4
(
2017
).
2.
A.
Franklyn-Stokes
and
S. E.
Newstead
.
1995
.
Undergraduate cheating: who does what and why?
Studies in higher education
20
,
2
(
1995
),
159
172
.
3.
S.
Iglesias-Pradas
,
M.
Hernández-García
, and
M.
Chaparro-Peláez
.
2021
.
Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study
.
Computers in human behavior
119
(
2021
),
106713
.
4.
R. M.
Felder
,
R.
Brent
, and
S. R.
Prince
.
2000
.
The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work
.
Chemical engineering education
34
,
1
(2000),
26
39
.
5.
A.
Nigam
,
R.
Mittal
, and
P.
Gupta
.
2021
.
A systematic review on AI-based proctoring systems: Past, present and future
.
Education and Information Technologies
26
,
5
(
2021
),
6421
6445
.
6.
C. Y.
Chuang
,
S. D.
Craig
, and
J.
Femiani
,
2017
.
Detecting probable cheating during online assessments based on time delay and head pose
.
Higher Education Research & Development
36
,
6
(
2017
),
1123
1137
.
7.
S.
Maniar
,
M.
Shanbhag
, and
M.
Gupta
,
2021
. Automated proctoring system using computer vision techniques. In 2021 International Conference on System, Computation,
Automation and Networking (ICSCAN)
.
IEEE
, 2021,
192
197
.
8.
H.
Li
,
L.
Feng
,
Z.
Sun
, and
X.
Liu
.
2021
.
A visual analytics approach to facilitate the proctoring of online exams
. In
Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
. 2021,
1
12
.
9.
C. Y.
Wang
,
A.
Bochkovskiy
, and
H. Y. M.
Liao
.
2022
.
YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors.
arXiv (2022).
10.
T. Y.
Lin
,
M.
Maire
,
S.
Belongie
,
J.
Hays
,
P.
Perona
,
D.
Ramanan
,
P.
Dollár
, and
C. L.
Zitnick
.
2015
.
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context.
arXiv (2015).
11.
Z.
Ge
,
S.
Liu
,
F.
Wang
,
Z.
Li
, and
J.
Sun
.
2021
.
YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021.
arXiv (2021).
12.
K. Y.
Wong
.
2022
.
YOLOR.
Accessed: Oct. 12, 2022. https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolor.
13.
C. Y.
Wang
,
A.
Bochkovskiy
, and
H. Y. M.
Liao
.
2021
.
Scaled-YOLOv4: Scaling Cross Stage Partial Network.
arXiv (2021).
14.
Ultralytics
.
2022
.
ultralytics/yolov5.
Oct. 11, 2022. Accessed: Oct. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5
15.
Carion
,
Nicolas
, et al
2022
. "
DE⋮TR: End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
."
Meta Research
, Oct. 11, 2022. Accessed: Oct. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/facebookresearch/detr
16.
Zhu
,
Xizhou
,
Weijie
Su
,
Langyuan
Lu
,
Bin
Li
,
Xiaozhi
Wang
, and
Jifeng
Dai
.
2021
. "
Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection.
" arXiv, Mar. 17, 2021. doi: .
17.
Caron
,
Mathilde
, et al
2022
. "
DINO
."
IDEA-Research
, Oct. 11, 2022. Accessed: Oct. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/IDEA-Research/DINO
18.
Chen
,
Zhi
, et al
2022
. "
Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictions.
" arXiv, May 17, 2022. doi: .
19.
Wojke
,
Nicolai
, et al
2017
. "
Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric.
" arXiv, 2017, .
20.
Du
,
Yunhao
, et al
2022
. "
StrongSORT: Make DeepSORT Great Again.
" arXiv, 2022, .
21.
Baltrusaitis
,
Tadas
.
2022
. "
OpenFace: OpenFace – a state-of-the art tool intended for facial landmark detection, head pose estimation, facial action unit recognition, and eye-gaze estimation
."
GitHub
, https://github.com/TadasBaltrusaitis/OpenFace (accessed Oct. 12, 2022).
22.
King
,
Davis
E.
2022
. "
dlib C++ Library.
" http://dlib.net/ (accessed Oct. 12, 2022).
23.
Geitgey
,
Adam
.
2022
. "
face-recognition: Recognize faces from Python or from the command line.
" Accessed: Oct. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ageitgey/face_recognition
24.
Heartexlabs
.
2022
. "
Heartexlabs/labelImg.
" Oct. 12, 2022. Accessed: Oct. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/heartexlabs/labelImg
25.
Roboflow
.
2022
. "
Roboflow: Give your software the power to see objects in images and video.
" https://roboflow.com/ (accessed Oct. 12, 2022).
26.
Dall
,
E.
:
Creating Images from Text
,
OpenAI
, Jan. 05,
2021
. https://openai.com/blog/dall-e/ (accessed Oct. 13, 2022).
27.
Brown
,
Tom
B.
, et al
2020
. "
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.
" arXiv, Jul. 22, 2020. doi: .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.