The link between environmental degradation, energy and economic growth has been studied extensively. Energy consumption is an essential input to the economy of a country. However, excessive energy consumption without control may adversely affect the quality of the environment. Previous studies reported different results on the nexus. The classical approaches that assume sphericity of errors (homoscedasticity and no autocorrelation) might not be valid as many data are spatially dependent/ correlated. The ignorance of such spatial effects might lead to misleading results. Hence, this study utilises the spatial panel models incorporating the spatial effect in examining the nexus. This study has three main objectives: i) to examine the relationship between environmental degradation, output growth and renewable energy, ii) to examine the spatial effect in the nexus and iii) to determine whether spatial models provide consistent results using different spatial weight matrices. Data from 25 European countries from 2000 to 2018 are used for the analysis. In particular, the existence of the spatial effect is examined and modelled by considering different spatial models, namely the spatial Durbin model, spatial autoregressive model and spatial error model. The localities and distance among the spatial units are identified through the weight matrix (orders 1 and 2). The results reveal that SDM using the weight matrix of order 2 is the best model compared to other models. The main findings show that renewable energy is associated with lower environmental degradation. In addition, there are also spatial effects from renewable energy that contribute to reducing environmental degradation in a country. Furthermore, different weight matrices give relatively consistent results. The spatial effect implies that the neighbour countries highly influence the nexus of renewable energy in correcting the environmental problem. The effort of an authority to reduce environmental issues through adopting renewable energy to replace non-renewable energy might stimulate the same policy implementation from the neighbour countries. The helps to strengthen the implementation and effectiveness of the policy in the neighbourhoods.

1.
M.
Mercan
and
E.
Karakaya
, “
Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emission: Dynamic panel cointegration analysis for selected OECD countries
,”
Procedia Econ. and Finance.
23
,
587
592
(
2015
).
2.
A.
Pala
, “
Which energy-growth hypothesis is valid in OECD countries? Evidence from panel Granger causality
,”
Int. J. of Energy Econ. and Pol.
6
,
28
34
(
2016
).
3.
Q.
Wang
and
L.
Wang
, “
Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: A nonlinear panel data analysis
,”
Energy.
207
, (
2020
).
4.
N.
Apergis
and
J.E.
Payne
, “
CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America
,”
Energy Pol.
37
,
3282
3286
(
2009
).
5.
J.
Cerovi
,
M.
Muhadinovi
and
M.
Madonji
, “
How does renewable energy consumption affect economic growth in the traditional and new member states of the European Union?
,”
Energy Reports.
6
,
505
513
(
2020
).
6.
S.K.S.
Nordin
and
S.K.
Sek
, “
Spatial panel regression model for energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth in oil importing and exporting countries
,”
J. of Adv. Research in Dyn. and Control Systems.
11
,
258
266
(
2019
).
7.
D.
Balsalobre-Lorente
,
M.
Shahbaz
,
D.
Roubaud
and
S.
Farhani
, “
How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?
,”
Energy Pol.
113
,
356
367
(
2018
)
8.
M.
Bhattacharya
,
S.A.
Churchill
, and
S.R.
Paramati
, “
The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions
,”
Renew. Energy.
111
,
157
167
(
2017
).
9.
J.
Shen
and
C.
Luo
, “
Overall review of renewable energy subsidy policies in China – Contradictions of intentions and effect
,”
Renew. and Sustain. Energy Rev.
41
,
1478
1488
(
2015
).
10.
M.
Ciucci
,
Renewable Energy: Fact Sheets on the European Union - 2020.
Brussels
:
European Parliament
. (
2020
).
11.
L.
Li
,
J.
Lin
,
N.
Wu
,
S.
Xie
,
C.
Meng
,
Y.
Zheng
,
X.
Wang
and
Y.
Zhao
, “
Review and outlook on the international renewable energy development
,”
Energy and Built Env.
3
,
139
157
(
2022
).
12.
C.S.
Awaworyi
,
J.
Inekwe
,
R.
Smyth
and
X.
Zhang
, “
R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870– 2014
,”
Energay Econ.
80
,
30
37
(
2019
).
13.
R.M.
Solow
, “
A contribution to the theory of economic growth
,”
Quarterly J. of Econ.
70
,
65
94
(
1956
).
14.
Y.
Wang
,
L.
Kang
,
X.
Wu
and
Y.
Xiao
, “
Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: a spatial econometric approach
,”
Ecol. Indic.
34
,
15
21
(
2013
).
15.
A.
Karakas
, “
Economic Growth-CO2 Emission Relationship in OECD and Non-OECD Countries: A Panel Data Analysis for the Period between 1990-2011
,”
The Int. J. of Humanities & Soc. Studies.
2
,
57
62
(
2014
).
16.
J.
Yin
,
M.
Zheng
and
J.
Chen
, “
The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China
,”
Energy Pol.
77
,
97
108
(
2015
).
17.
J.
Yassin
and
S.B.
Aralas
, “
Economic Structural Transformation and CO2 Emissions in Asian Countries: Homogeneous Vs. Heterogeneous Estimators
,’
SSRN Electronic J.
4
,
57
68
(
2019
).
18.
Q.
Zhang
,
J.
Yang
,
Z.
Sun
, and
F.
Wu
, “
Analyzing the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: What can spatial panel regressions tell us?
,”
J. of Cleaner Prod.
161
,
1085
1093
(
2017
).
19.
Y.
Hao
,
Y.
Liu
,
J.
Weng
and
Y.
Gao
, “
Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve for coal consumption in China exist? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis
,”
Energy.
114
,
1214
1223
(
2016
).
20.
Y.
Kang
,
T.
Zhao
and
P.
Wu
, “
Impacts of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data technique
.
Nat. Hazards,” Nat. Hazards.
81
,
405
421
(
2016
).
21.
J.
Li
,
Y.
Luo
and
S.
Wang
, “
Spatial effects of economic performance on the carbon intensity of human well-being: The environmental Kuznets curve in Chinese provinces
,”
J. of Cleaner Prod.
233
,
681
694
(
2019
).
22.
V.
Rios
and
L.
Gianmoena
, “
Convergence in CO2 emissions: a spatial economic analysis with cross-country interactions
,”
Energy Economics
,
75
,
222
238
(
2018
).
23.
D.
Maddison
, “
Environmental Kuznets curves: a spatial econometric approach
,”
J. of Env. Econ. and Management.
51
,
218
230
(
2006
).
24.
J.W.
Burnett
,
J.C.
Bergstrom
and
J.H.
Dorfman
, “
Carbon dioxide emissions and eco-nomic growth in the US
,”
Energy Econ.
40
,
396
404
(
2013
).
25.
J.A.
Hausman
, “
Specification tests in econometrics
,”
Econom
,
46
,
1251
1271
(
1978
).
26.
W.
Tobler
, “
A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region
,”
Econ. Geogr.
2
,
234
240
(
1970
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.