In the past decade, the world has faced many challenges, including the effects resulting from human-induced greenhouse gas emissions. In the construction industry, efforts are being made to combat climate change and protect the environment by developing rating systems aimed at designing sustainable buildings. One of these tools is SBToolCZ, the Czech national certification used to assess the sustainability of various building typologies. Still, as buildings are becoming more energy-efficient, which should ensure low carbon emissions, the environmental impacts of building components should be methodically examined. This paper compares two versions of the tool specifically addressed to office buildings – the one developed in 2011 and the recently updated version developed in accordance with the new priorities indicated by the European Green Deal. The comparative analysis investigates what has been changed, focusing on six environmental impacts calculated for the A1-A3, B4 and B6 LCA stages applied to an office building. On this basis, the paper aims to assess two different SBToolCZ versions and understand how the Methodology has been modified considering a case study and six environmental parameters.

1.
M.
Dabaieh
, “
Energy efficient design strategies for contemporary vernacular buildings in Egypt
”, in
Vernac. Herit. Earthen Archit.
(
2013
)
599
604
. .
2.
United Nations, The Sustainable Development Goals
, (
2015
). https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
3.
Goal 11: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform
, (n.d.).
4.
European Commission, European Green Deal
, (
2019
).
5.
USGBC
,
LEED v4.1 Building Design and Construction
,
2021
. .
6.
BREEAM
,
BREEAM International New Construction 2016-Technical Manual
,
2016
.
7.
DGNB
,
DGNB System New Construction, Buildings Criteria Set-Version 2020
,
2020
.
8.
T.
Lützkendorf
, “
Assessing the environmental performance of buildings: trends, lessons and tensions
” in
Build. Res. Inf.
46
(
2018
)
594
614
. .
9.
J.
Andrade
,
L.
Bragança
, “
Sustainability assessment of dwellings – a comparison of methodologies
” in
Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst.
33
(
2016
)
125
146
. .
10.
T.
Lützkendorf
,
P.
Hájek
,
A.
Lupíšek
,
A.
Immendörfer
,
S.
Nibel
,
T.
Häkkinen
, “
New trends in sustainability assessment systems – based on top-down approach and stakeholders needs
” in
Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev.
3
(
2012
). .
11.
D.T.
Doan
,
A.
Ghaffarianhoseini
,
N.
Naismith
,
T.
Zhang
,
A.
Ghaffarianhoseini
,
J.
Tookey
, “
A critical comparison of green building rating systems
” in
Build. Environ.
123
(
2017
)
243
260
. .
12.
S.-C.
Wong
,
N.
Abe
, “
Stakeholders’ perspectives of a building environmental assessment method: The case of CASBEE
” in
Build. Environ.
82
(
2014
)
502
516
. .
13.
M. Oliva Y
Hausmann
,
T.
Lüzkendorf
,
A.
Rietz
, “Sustainability assessment system for utilisation and operation of single buildings”, in:
P.
Hájek
,
J.
Tywoniak
,
A.
Lupíšek
,
K.
Sojková
(Eds.),
CESB 2013 PRAGUE-Cent. Eur. Towar. Sustain. Build. 2013 Sustain. Build. Refurb. Next Gener
.,
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering
,
Prague
,
2013
: pp.
757
760
.
14.
P.
Hájek
,
A.
Panek
, “Credibility of Building Assessment Systems”, in:
P.
Hájek
,
J.
Tywoniak
,
A.
Lupíšek
,
K.
Sojková
(Eds.),
CESB 2013 PRAGUE-Cent. Eur. Towar. Sustain. Build. 2013 Sustain. Build. Refurb. Next Gener
.,
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering
,
Prague
,
2013
: pp.
661
664
.
15.
International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment
, (
2022
). https://www.iisbe.org/ (accessed May 30, 2022).
16.
R.J.
Cole
,
L.
Mitchell
, “
Customising and using GBTool: two case-study projects
” in
Build. Res. Inf.
27
(
1999
)
257
275
. .
17.
E.
Bernardi
,
S.
Carlucci
,
C.
Cornaro
,
R.
Bohne
, “
An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings
” in
Sustainability.
9
(
2017
)
1226
. .
18.
A.
Devitofrancesco
,
M.
Ghellere
,
I.
Meroni
, “
Systems for the assessment of the environmental sustainability of buildings: The national experiences
”, in:
COBRA 2010-Constr. Build. Real Estate Res. Conf. R. Inst. Chart. Surv. 2010, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
,
Paris
,
2010
: p.
23
.
19.
F.
Asdrubali
,
G.
Baldinelli
,
F.
Bianchi
,
S.
Sambuco
, “
A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings
” in
Build. Environ.
86
(
2015
)
98
108
. .
20.
R.
Mateus
,
L.
Bragança
, “
Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the Methodology SBToolPT-H
” in
Build. Environ.
46
(
2011
)
1962
1971
. .
21.
M. de F.
Castro
,
R.
Mateus
,
L.
Bragança
, “
Development of a healthcare building sustainability assessment method – Proposed structure and system of weights for the Portuguese context
” in
J. Clean. Prod.
148
(
2017
)
555
570
. .
22.
GBCe
,
VERDE Residencial. Guía para el Evaluador Acreditado
.,
2019
.
23.
United Nations, The Sustainable Development Goals, New York City
,
2015
. .
24.
SBToolCZ
, (
2022
). https://www.sbtool.cz/ (accessed May 30, 2022).
25.
SBToolCZ Certified Buildings
, (
2022
). https://www.sbtool.cz/certifikovane-budovy/ (accessed May 29, 2022).
26.
M.
Vonka
,
P.
Hájek
,
F.
Havlík
,
J.
Hodková
,
A.
Lupíšek
,
Š.
Mančík
,
T.
Pavlů
,
J.
Pečman
,
P.
Schorsch
,
J.
Tencar
,
M.
Volf
,
J.
Vychytil
,
Methodology SBToolCZ – Manual for evaluation of administrative buildings in the design phase
,
2011
.
27.
IEA EBC Annex 72, Assessing Life Cycle Related Environmental Impacts Caused
, (
2022
). https://annex72.iea-ebc.org/ (accessed May 30, 2022).
28.
J.
Hodková
,
A.
Lupíšek
,
Š.
Mančík
,
L.
Vochoc
,
T.
Žd’ára
, “
Envimat.cz – Online Database of Environmental Profiles of Building Materials and Structures
” in
Int. Symp. Environ. Softw. Syst.
, (
2011
), pp.
272
279
. .
29.
Envimat.cz
, (
2022
). http://envimat.cz/ (accessed May 22, 2022).
30.
Ecoinvent
, (
2022
). https://ecoinvent.org/ (accessed May 20, 2022).
31.
International EPD, The International EPD system
, (
2021
). https://www.environdec.com/library (accessed February 8, 2021).
32.
German Federal Ministry of the Interior Building and Community, Ökobaudat
, (n.d.). https://www.oekobaudat.de (accessed February 8,
2021
).
33.
Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V., EPD Online Tool
, (n.d.). https://ibu-epd.com/en/ (accessed February 8,
2021
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.