In today’s world with increasingly complex businesses activities, it is very important for organizations to consider a good occupational health and safety (OHS) management practice. However, this situation may not be applied to small-medium enterprises (SMEs). SMEs considered to have a vital role in many countries are still experiencing various challenges to implement a proper OHS management especially in managing potential risks of occupational hazards. It is necessary to develop a risk management procedure which is understandable and effective so that occupational accident cases in SMEs can be reduced. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to develop a risk assessment method with simple computation and reliable result. The MCDM approach is employed to develop the model by integrating best-worst method (BWM) and VIseKritrijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). To test the model, a case study in an Indonesian furniture small-medium business is selected. The first, the company’s experts identified the occupational risks categorized into four risk groups, namely physical risk (A), biological risk (B), chemical risk (C), and psychosocial risk (D). The second, the BWM method is applied to obtain the optimal weight of the three criteria, namely probability (P), frequency (F), and Impact (I). Since there is a conflicting context to define the criteria among the decision-makers (DMs), the VIKOR method is then selected to rank the risks. The result indicates that the critical risks are mostly physical risks and chemical risk that must be mitigated immediately. The psychosocial risks are further getting more attention to be serious risks which encourages compelling discussion for future studies.

1.
M.
Gul
,
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
24
,
1723
(
2018
).
2.
A.
Tremblay
and
A.
Badri
,
Safety Science
101
,
260
(
2018
).
3.
E.
Ilbahar
,
A.
Karaşan
,
S.
Cebi
, and
C.
Kahraman
,
Safety Science
103
,
124
(
2018
).
4.
M.
Seneviratne
and
W. On
Phoon
,
Exposure Assessment in SMEs: A Low-Cost Approach to Bring OHS Services to Small-Scale Enterprises
(
2006
).
5.
E.
Cagno
,
G.J.L.
Micheli
, and
S.
Perotti
,
Safety Science
49
,
216
(
2011
).
6.
E.K.
Delice
and
S.
Zegerek
,
Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences
10
,
2345
(
2016
).
7.
C.M. la
Fata
,
A.
Giallanza
,
R.
Micale
, and
G. la
Scalia
,
Safety Science
138
, (
2021
).
8.
M.
Gul
,
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
26
,
705
(
2020
).
9.
M.
Ilangkumaran
,
M.
Karthikeyan
,
T.
Ramachandran
,
M.
Boopathiraja
, and
B.
Kirubakaran
,
Safety Science
72
,
133
(
2014
).
10.
E.K.
Delice
and
S.
Zegerek
,
Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences
10
,
2345
(
2016
).
11.
B.
Kaassis
and
A.
Badri
,
Safety
4
, (
2018
).
12.
N.A.
Kheni
,
Alistair
,
G.F.
Gibb
,
A.R.J.
Dainty
, and
M.
Asce
, (n.d.).
13.
K.
Reinhold
,
M.
Järvis
, and
P.
Tint
,
SafetyScience
71
,
282
(
2015
).
14.
A.F.
Guneri
,
M.
Gul
, and
S.
Ozgurler
,
A Fuzzy AHP Methodology for Selection of Risk Assessment Methods in Occupational Safety
(
2015
).
15.
V.R.B.
Kurniawan
and
F.H.
Puspitasari
,
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
1071
,
012004
(
2021
).
16.
J.
Rezaei
,
Omega (United Kingdom)
53
,
49
(
2015
).
17.
S.
Opricovic
and
G.H.
Tzeng
,
European Journal of Operational Research
156
,
445
(
2004
).
18.
M.
Gul
,
International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences
(
2021
).
19.
J.
Wei
and
X.
Lin
, in (
IEEE
,
2008
).
20.
H.T.
Nguyen
,
U.
Safder
,
J.I.
Kim
,
S.K.
Heo
, and
C.K.
Yoo
,
Journal of Cleaner Production
339
, (
2022
).
21.
F. Curtis
Breslin
,
J.
Polzer
,
E.
MacEachen
,
B.
Morrongiello
, and
H.
Shannon
,
Social Science and Medicine
64
,
782
(
2007
).
22.
B.
Yanar
,
M.
Lay
, and
P.M.
Smith
,
Safety and Health at Work
10
,
172
(
2019
).
23.
J.
Oakman
and
S.
Chan
,
Safety Science
73
,
99
(
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.