To support the nuclear R&D program, especially on its first nuclear power plant in Indonesia, Research Organization for Nuclear Energy (ORTN) BRIN has carried out several stages of research related to the safety of reactor operations. This study was part of increasing the safety of nuclear power plants, by determining the neutronic behavior of the U3Si2 fuel assembly as a substitute for the UO2 in the AP1000 reactor. U3Si2 fuel is promising because its high thermal conductivity will provide lower fuel temperatures during normal operation, and its high uranium density could lead to economic benefits. Neutronic parameters were calculated using the PIJ module from SRAC2006 with the ENDF/B-VII nuclear data. The infinite multiplication factor (k-inf), reactivity coefficient, and neutron spectrum of the PWR AP1000 fuel assembly will discuss. In general, calculations were carried out in Hot Full Power (HFP) conditions, with 900 K fuel temperature, the coolant temperature, and cladding temperature was 557.55 K with 1184 ppm boron and without boron. The calculation results show that the Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) and Doppler Temperature Coefficient (DTC) of U3Si2 fuel are always negative for all operating conditions that could ensure the reactor core’s inherent safety. The MTC value of U3Si2 is more negative than UO2 because of the hardened spectrum, which reduces the number of thermal neutrons and increases the neutron moderator role. The k-inf of UO2 fuel is greater than U3Si2 with the highest being around 501 pcm in without boron condition. Meanwhile, in the presence of boron in the coolant, the U3Si2 fuel k-inf is greater than UO2 with a difference between 306 – 520 pcm. This is because UO2 fuel has a thermal neutron spectrum larger than U3Si2, which caused boron to be more effective at oxide than silicide. Hence by using silicide fuel, it is possible to readjust the amount of boron and a burnable poison to increase its fuel efficiency. The results of this calculation show that U3Si2 fuel has good potential for use in the PWR reactor because it provides several benefits on neutronic parameters to increase the safety of reactor operation.

1.
Younan
S
,
Novog
D.
Assessment of Neutronic Characteristics of Accident-Tolerant Fuel and Claddings for CANDU Reactors
.
Sci Technol Nucl Install.
2018
;2018(Volume
2018
):
17
pages.
2.
Tran
HN
,
Hoang
VK
,
Liem
PH
,
Hoang
HTP
.
Neutronics design of VVER-1000 fuel assembly with burnable poison particles
.
Nucl Eng Technol.
2019
;
51
(
7
):
1729
37
.
3.
Peakman
A
,
Grove
C
,
Fitzgerald
K
,
Gregg
R.
Development of an equilibrium loading pattern and whole-core fuel performance assessment in the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) with UO2 and U3Si2 fuels
.
Prog Nucl Energy.
2019
;
117
(April):
103053
.
4.
Wagner
AR
,
Harp
JM
,
Archibald
KE
,
Ashby
SC
,
Watkins
JK
,
Tolman
KR
.
MethodsX Fabrication of stoichiometric U 3 Si 2 fuel pellets
.
MethodsX.
2019
;
6
:
1252
60
.
5.
Turner
J
,
Middleburgh
S
,
Abram
T.
A high density composite fuel with integrated burnable absorber : Vol. 529
,
Journal of Nuclear Materials.
Elsevier B.V;
2020
.
6.
Harp
JM
,
Lessing
PA
,
Hoggan
RE
.
Uranium Silicide Pellet Fabrication by Powder Metallurgy for Accident Tolerant Uranium Silicide Pellet Fabrication by Powder Metallurgy for Accident Tolerant Fuel Evaluation and Irradiation
.
J Nucl Mater.
2015
;
7.
Chen
S
,
Yuan
C.
Neutronic Analysis on Potential Accident Tolerant Fuel-Cladding Combination U3Si2-FeCrAl
.
Sci Technol Nucl Install.
2017
;2017.
8.
Frazer
D
,
Maiorov
B
,
Carvajal-nuñez
U
,
Evans
J
,
Kardoulaki
E
,
Dunwoody
J.
High temperature mechanical properties of fluorite crystal structured materials ( CeO 2, ThO 2, and UO 2 ) and advanced accident tolerant fuels
.
J Nucl Mater.
2021
;
554
:
153035
.
9.
Schulz
TL
.
Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant
.
Nucl Eng Des.
2006
;
236
(
14–16
):
1547
57
.
10.
Kuntoro
I
,
Pinem
S
,
Sembiring
TM
.
Analysis of Reactivity Coefficient Change Due To Burn Up in Ap1000 Reactor Core Using Nodal3
.
J Teknol Reakt Nukl Tri Dasa Mega.
2017
;
19
(
3
):
131
.
11.
Pinem
S
,
Sembiring
TM
,
Tukiran
,
Deswandri
,
Sunaryo
GR
.
Reactivity Coefficient Calculation for AP1000 Reactor Using the NODAL3 Code
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
2018
;
962
(
1
):
1
8
.
12.
Sembiring
TM
,
Susilo
J
,
Pinem
S.
Evaluation of the AP1000 delayed neutron parameters using
. In:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
2018
. p.
012030
.
13.
Okumura
K
,
Kugo
T
,
Kaneko
K
,
Tsuchihashi
J.
SRAC2006: A Comprehensive Neutronics Calculation Code System
.
Tokai
:
Japan Atomic Energy Agency
;
2007
. p.
326
.
14.
Pinem
S
,
Sembiring
TM
,
Surbakti
T.
Pwr Fuel Macroscopic Cross Section Analysis for Calculation Core Fuel Management Benchmark
.
J Phys Conf Ser.
2019
;
1198
(
2
).
15.
Luthfi
W
,
Pinem
S.
Calculation of 2-Dimensional PWR MOX/UO2 Core Benchmark OECD NEA 6048 With SRAC Code
.
J Teknol Reakt Nukl Tri Dasa Mega.
2020
;
22
(
3
):
89
.
16.
Luthfi
W
,
Pinem
S.
Validation of SRAC Code System for Neutronic Calculation of thr PWR MOX/UO2 Core Benchmark
.
Urania J Ilm Daur Bahan Bakar Nukl.
2021
;
27
(
1
):
47
56
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.