Kriging models are statistical methods for approximating and estimating computer models. Kriging models have been used to replace time-consuming computer models with fast-running alternatives. Kriging models are constructed based on some assumptions. Thus, if these assumptions are not suitable and consistent with the computer model outputs, inferences and results of the Kriging models will not be accurate. Therefore, KMs need to be subjected to validation measures before using them in different areas of science. In this paper, we propose some measures that can be used for validating Kriging models. These measures are based on comparing KM predictions and computer model outputs. We investigate the performance of the proposed measures via some real examples of computer models, the Borehole model, and the Piston Simulation function.

1.
Y. H.
Al-Taweel
, “
Diagnostics and Simulation-Based Methods for Validating Gaussian Process Emulators
,” Ph.D. Thesis,
Sheffield University
,
2018
.
2.
Y. H.
Al-Taweel
and
N.
Sadeek
,
A comparison of different methods for building Bayesian kriging models
(
Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research
,
2020
), pp.
73
82
.
3.
L. S.
Bastos
and
A.
O’Hagan
,
Diagnostics for Gaussian process emulators
(
Technometrics
,
2009
),
51
(
4
), pp.
425
438
.
4.
D.
Drignei
,
Fast statistical surrogates for dynamical 3D CMs of brain tumors
(
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
,
2008
),
17
(
4
), pp.
844
859
.
5.
K.-T.
Fang
,
R.
Li
and
A.
Sudjianto
,
Design and modeling for computer experiments
(
Chapman and Hall/CRC
2005
).
6.
A. I.
Forrester
,
A.
Sóbester
, and
A. J.
Keane
,
Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling
(
Proceedings of the Royal Society a: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
,
2007
),
463
(
2088
), pp.
3251
3269
.
7.
C.
Fuchs
, and
R. S.
Kenett
,
Multivariate quality control: Theory and applications
(
Chapman and Hall/CRC
,
1998
).
8.
Z.-H.
Han
, and
S.
Görtz
,
HierarChical kriging model for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling
(
AIAA Journal
,
2012
),
50
(
9
), pp.
1885
1896
.
9.
Y.
Hung
,
V. R.
Joseph
, and
S. N.
Melkote
,
Design and analysis of computer experiments with branChing and nested factors
(
Technometrics
,
2009
),
51
(
4
), pp.
354
365
.
10.
Y.
Kuya
,
K.
Takeda
,
X.
Zhang
and
A. I.
Forrester
,
Multifidelity surrogate modeling of experimental and computational aerodynamic data sets
(
AIAA Journal
,
2011
),
49
(
2
), pp.
289
298
.
11.
S.
Ly
,
C.
Charles
and
A.
Degré
,
Different methods for spatial interpolation of rainfall data for operational hydrology and hydrological modeling at watershed scale: A review
(
Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement
,
2013
),
17
(
2
), pp.
392
406
.
12.
J. D.
Marti
and
T. W. A
Simpson
,
Study on the use of kriging models to approximate deterministic CMs
(
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
2003
),
37009
, pp.
567
576
.
13.
R.
Rossouw
,
R.
Coetzer
, and
P.
Pretorius
,
Simulation experiments for maximising the availability of a commercial octene production facility
(
ORiON
,
2010
),
26
(
1
), pp.
58
68
.
14.
J.
Sacks
,
W. J.
Welch
,
T. J.
Mitchell
, and
H. P.
Wynn
,
Design and analysis of computer experiments
(
Statistical Science
,
1989
),
4
(
4
), pp.
409
423
.
15.
T. J.
Santner
,
B. J.
Williams
,
W. I.
Notz
, and
B. J.
Williams
,
The design and analysis of computer experiments
(
Springer
,
2003
) (Vol.
1
).
16.
B. A.
Worley
,
Deterministic uncertainty analysis
(
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN
(
USA
),
1987
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.