To date, rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicles are widely used in various fields due to the proven versatility of this class of equipment, small dimensions, low thermal, acoustic and radar visibility, the ability to operate in conditions of significant overloads, and a wide temperature range, and the ability to carry out off-airfield takeoff and landing. However, labor, financial and material costs for the creation of such devices are growing due to the complexity of flight tasks. Of particular importance here is the technical and economic risk associated with possible engineering errors, manifestations of hidden defects that were not detected during testing, etc. To reduce the likelihood of these adverse events, considering the time spent and the cost of design, an integrated approach is needed to cover all aspects of the development and operation of an unmanned aerial complex. The solution to this problem is possible through an organic combination of traditional and progressive highly informative methods. One of the successfully used approaches is automated mathematical modeling of aircraft dynamics at various stages of flight. The results obtained in the course of computer tests are used for operational verification and debugging of flight control system algorithms, serving as initial indicative indicators of flight performance and operational characteristics, allowing to significantly speed up the development process at the early stages. This article discusses an alternative simulation option using the MATLAB Simulink software package and the X-Plane flight simulator computational module on the example of an unmanned aerial vehicle of a coaxial helicopter type. This method is compared with the classical approach to mathematical modeling of vehicle dynamics. Information interaction is implemented between the control system loops and the modeling environment for the purposes of operational analysis of flight information. Verification of the developed mathematical model is carried out by comparing the results of computer tests with the data obtained during field tests of the prototype.

1.
J-H.
Byun
,
G-M.
Lee
and
S-H.
Kim
,
Design of Experiments for Optimization of Helicopter Flight Tests
,
Transactions of the KSME C Industrial Technology and Innovation, The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
2014
, pp.
113
124
.
2.
S. P.
Gulevich
,
Flight tests of high-speed unmanned aerial vehicles: Monograph
. –
M
.:
Publishing house “PERVY TOM”
,
2018
. –
289
p.
3.
T.
McAteer
,
C.
Rice
, and
C.
Gavin
,
Flight test safety — The U.S. navy approach
,
IEEE Aerospace Conference
,
2018
.
4.
J.
Gregory
and
T.
Liu
2021
,
Introduction to Flight Testing
,
Aerospace Series
,
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
, 2021.
5.
D. H.
Costello
,
J.
Jewell
, and
H.
Xu
,
Autonomous Flight-Test Data in Support of Safety of Flight Certification
,
Aerospace Research Central
,
2020
.
6.
E.
Hallberg
,
I.
Kaminer
, and
A.
Pascoal
,
Flight Test System for Unmanned Air Vehicles
,
IEEE control systems
,
1999
, pp.
55
65
.
7.
V.
Kramar
,
A.
Kabanov
, and
S.
Dudnikov
,
A Mathematical Model for a Conceptual Design and Analyses of UAV Stabilization Systems
,
Modeling, and control of autonomous vehicles and robots, Fluids
,
2021
, p.
172
.
8.
A.
Alaimo
,
A.
Esposito
,
C.
Orlando
and
G.
Tesoriere
,
A Pilot Mental Workload Case Study in a Full Flight Simulator
,
Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio
,
2018
, pp.
27
33
.
9.
P. T.
Jensen
,
H. C.
Curtiss
, and
R. M.
Mckillip
,
An Analytically Linearized Helicopter Model with Improved Modeling Accuracy
,
NASA Technical Reports Server
,
1991
.
10.
R.
Bradley
,
G. D.
Padfield
,
D.
Murray-Smith
and
D. G.
Thomson
,
Validation of Helicopter Mathematical Models
,
Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control
,
1990
, pp.
186
196
.
11.
S.
Avcıoğlu
,
A.
Kutay
, and
K.
Leblebicioglu
,
Identification of Physical Helicopter Models Using Subspace Identification
,
Journal of the American Helicopter Society
,
2020
.
12.
E. A.
Petrosyan
,
Aerodynamics of a coaxial helicopter. Balancing, stability, controllability, maneuverability, automatic stabilization, and automatic control
,
JSC Kamov, Kazan
,
2004
. –
816p
.
13.
L.V.
Bykov
,
O.A.
Pashkov
,
M.N.
Pravidlo
,
V.V.
Tishkov
and
D.S.
Yanishev
,
Numerical Simulation of Detachment Dynamics of a Payload from the Parent Aircraft
,
Russian Aeronautics
,
2018
, pp.
194
200
.
14.
A. E.
Bondarev
,
On the Estimation of the Accuracy of Numerical Solutions in CFD Problems
,
Computational Science, ICCS 19th International Conference Proceedings
,
2019
, pp.
325
333
.
15.
M.
Costes
,
T.
Renaud
and
B.
Rodriguez
,
Rotorcraft Simulations: A Challenge for CFD
,
International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics
,
2012
, pp.
383
405
.
16.
E. N.
Tinoco
,
D. R.
Bogue
,
T-J.
Kao
,
N. J.
Yu
,
P.
Li
and
D. N.
Ball
,
Progress Toward CFD for Full Flight Envelope
,
Aeronautical Journal-New Series-
,
2005
, pp.
451
460
.
17.
A.
Meyer
,
FAA-Certified X-Plane
,
X-Plane Flight Simulator Official Website, Laminar Research
, available at: https://www.x-plane.com/pro/certified/.
18.
J.
Katz
and
A.
Plotkin
,
Low-Speed Aerodynamics. From Wing Theory to Panel Methods
,
McGraw-Hill, Inc
.,
1991
, -
638
pp.
19.
J.
Seddon
and
S.
Newman
,
Rotor in Vertical Flight: Blade Element Theory
,
Basic Helicopter Aerodynamics
, Third Edition,
2011
, pp.
63
78
.
20.
M. F.
Yaakub
,
A. A.
Wahab
,
A.
Abdullah
,
N. A.
Mohd
, and
S. S.
Shamsuddin
,
Aerodynamic Prediction of Rotor in Forwarding Flight using Blade Element Theory
,
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
,
2019
.
21.
K.
Uwatoko
,
M.
Kanazaki
,
H.
Nagai
and
Koji
Fujita
,
Blade Element Theory Coupled with CFD Applied to Optimal Design of Rotor for Mars Exploration Helicopter
,
AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum
,
2020
.
22.
O. I.
Kuznetsov
and
V. M.
Soldatkin
,
Analysis and Synthesis of the Information-controlling System Channels to Prevent Critical Operating Conditions of the Helicopter Flight
,
Russian Aeronautics
,
2017
, pp.
263
269
.
23.
V.I.
Akhrameev
,
A.A.
Glazkov
,
V.M.
Shibaev
, and
D.V.
Shoulepov
,
Critical Flight Conditions at High Angles of Attack, Related to Loss of Control in Lateral Motion
,
Advances in Military Technology
, pp.
62
84
.
24.
A. N.
Khrabrov
,
M. E.
Sidoryuk
,
E. N.
Kolesnikov
,
Y. A.
Vinogradov
,
I. I.
Grishin
, and
K. A.
Kolinko
,
On Possibility of Critical Flight Regime Study in Wind Tunnels Using Three-degree-of-freedom Gimbals
,
TsAGI Science Journal
,
2015
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.