The food supply chain actor is complex. Many actors are involved, such as suppliers, manufacturers or producers, distribution, retailers and customers. The number of actors is interdependent with each other. Additionally, system dynamic is one of the simulation methodologies capturing the holistic, nonlinear and multiloop systems. This research aims to capture the overview of academic studies about system dynamic simulation’ applications in the food supply chain. The methodology that has been used in this research is using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis method. There are five phases to the research process. The first step is searching criteria and sourcing the identification. Then, filtering the period and language used. The final step is the analysis of data and interpretation. The analysis of this research will find the predominant contributing articles, authors, affiliations, and keywords. VOS viewer will portray the systematic graphical and clustering data. Research grouping will be beneficial in analyzing the development of simulation innovations, especially in the future research group in the food supply chain field. Moreover, this research will classify the application of system dynamics simulation in the content of the type of food product in the food supply chain, the research goal (social, economic, environmental), and the stakeholder engagement in the supply chain. Then, the researchers and practitioners shall be able to explore the topic initiatives that have the hallmarks of future developments.

1.
B.
Chung
, “
System Dynamics Modelling and Simulation of the Malaysian Rice Value Chain: Effects of the Removal of Price Controls and an Import Monopoly on Rice Prices and Self-sufficiency Levels in Malaysia
,”
Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.
, vol.
35
, no.
3
, pp.
248
264
,
2018
.
2.
W.
Findiastuti
,
M. Laksono
Singgih
, and
M.
Anityasari
, “
Indonesian sustainable food-availability policy assessment using system dynamics: A solution for complexities
,”
Cogent Food Agric.
, vol.
4
, no.
1
, p.
1455795
,
2018
.
3.
J. W.
Forrester
, “The system dynamics national model: Macrobehavior from microstructure,” in
Computer-based management of complex systems
,
Springer
,
1989
, pp.
3
12
.
4.
J. W.
Forrester
, “
System dynamics—the next fifty years
,” vol.
29
, no.
4
,
Wiley Interscience
,
2011
, pp.
75
97
.
5.
S.
Karami
,
E.
Karami
,
L.
Buys
, and
R.
Drogemuller
, “
System dynamic simulation: A new method in social impact assessment (SIA
),”
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
, vol.
62
, pp.
25
34
,
2017
.
6.
W.
Rand
and
R. T.
Rust
, “
Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor
,”
Int. J. Res. Mark.
, vol.
28
, no.
3
, pp.
181
193
,
2011
.
7.
H.
Wahyuni
,
I.
Vanany
, and
U.
Ciptomulyono
, “
Food safety and halal food in the supply chain: Review and bibliometric analysis
,”
J. Ind. Eng. Manag.
, vol.
12
, no.
2
, pp.
373
391
,
2019
.
8.
L.
Leydesdorff
and
I.
Rafols
, “
Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data
,”
J. Informetr.
, vol.
6
, no.
2
, pp.
318
332
,
2012
.
9.
D.
Bechtsis
,
N.
Tsolakis
,
D.
Vlachos
, and
J. S.
Srai
, “
Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles in digital supply chains: A framework for integrating innovations towards sustainable value networks
,”
J. Clean. Prod.
, vol.
181
, pp.
60
71
,
2018
.
10.
A.
Thakur
,
A. K.
Dixit
,
S.
Kumar
, and
G.
Bhandari
, “
Value Chain Analysis of Informal Dairy Processing Units in Haryana (India): A System Dynamic Approach
,”
Agric. Res.
, vol.
10
, no.
2
, pp.
307
313
,
2021
.
11.
E.
Suryani
,
R. A.
Hendrawan
,
T.
Mulyono
, and
L. P.
Dewi
, “
System dynamics model to support rice production and distribution for food security
,”
J. Teknol. (Sciences Eng.
, vol.
68
, no.
3
, pp.
45
51
,
2014
.
12.
L.
Hakim
,
A.
Deli
, and
Zulkarnain
, “
The system dynamics modeling of Gayo arabica coffee industry supply chain management
,”
IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.
, vol.
425
, no.
1
,
2020
.
13.
S. K.
Mangla
,
Y.
Kazancoglu
,
E.
Ekinci
,
M.
Liu
,
M.
Özbiltekin
, and
M. D.
Sezer
, “
Using system dynamics to analyze the societal impacts of blockchain technology in milk supply chainsrefer
,”
Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
, vol.
149
, no. July 2020,
2021
.
14.
E.
Suryani
,
R. A.
Hendrawan
,
I.
Muhandhis
, and
R.
Indraswari
, “
A simulation model to improve the value of rice supply chain (A case study in East Java–Indonesia
),”
J. Simul.
, vol.
00
, no.
00
, pp.
1
23
,
2020
.
15.
J. A. O.
Castro
and
W. A.
Jaimes
, “
Dynamic impact of the structure of the supply chain of perishable foods on logistics performance and food security
,”
J. Ind. Eng. Manag.
, vol.
10
, no.
4
Special Issue, pp.
687
710
,
2017
.
16.
M. H.
Khodeir
and
H. M.
Abdelsalam
, “
Simulating Corn Supply, Demand and Consumption in Egypt
,”
Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Informatics Syst. - INFOS ’16.
, pp.
14
20
,
2016
.
17.
B. K.
Bala
,
M. G. K.
Bhuiyan
,
M. M.
Alam
,
F. M.
Arshad
,
S. F.
Sidique
, and
E. F.
Alias
, “
Modelling of supply chain of rice in Bangladesh
,”
Int. J. Syst. Sci. Oper. Logist.
, vol.
4
, no.
2
, pp.
181
197
,
2017
.
18.
C.
Wang
,
Y.
Zhao
,
Y. ping
Wei
, and
G. qing
Shi
, “
Systems dynamics approach to understanding the impacts of aquaculture closure policies on environmental pressures and fishermen households’ incomes in Danjiangkou Reservoir, China
,”
Aquac. Int.
, vol.
25
, no.
6
, pp.
2227
2257
,
2017
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.