The aim of this work is to design an Innovative sleeve dipole array antenna with high directivity and gain. Materials and Methods: For comparison the two antennas are separated into two groups. Group 1 is considered as a sleeve dipole array antenna and group 2 is considered as a microstrip patch antenna. Initially 10 samples are taken from each group but for accurate comparison sample size is taken as 6 for each group. The significance obtained was 0.01 (p<0.05). The alpha value is 0.05 and the beta value is 0.2 and the gpower value is 0.8. Results: The simulated results that are obtained in FEKO software are, directivity for the sleeve dipole array antenna at 2.4GHz is 10.57dBi and for microstrip patch antenna the directivity is 6.48dBi. The bandwidth for sleeve dipole array antenna is 0.61GHz and for microstrip patch it is 0.12GHz. Conclusion: By analyzing all the obtained results, the sleeve dipole array antenna will perform better than microstrip patch antenna for submarine communication.

1.
H.F.
AbuTarboush
,
H.S.
Al-Raweshidy
, and
R.
Nilavalan
, in
2009 IEEE Int. Work. Antenna Technol. IWAT 2009
(
2009
).
2.
B.S.
Ashok
,
T.A.
Ajith
, and
S.
Sivanesan
,
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.
44
,
327
(
2017
).
3.
J.
Anguera
,
C.
Puente
,
E.
Martínez
, and
E.
Rozan
,
Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett.
36
,
102
(
2003
).
4.
M.G.
Bray
and
D.H.
Werner
, in
IEEE Antennas Propag. Soc. AP-S Int. Symp
. (
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc
.,
2004
), pp.
1147
1150
.
5.
D.C.
Chang
and
C.C.
Chen
, in
IWEB 2011-IEEE Int. Work. Electromagn. Appl. Student Innov. Compet.
(
2011
), pp.
114
119
.
6.
D.C.
Chang
and
Y.C.
Su
, in
2016 Prog. Electromagn. Res. Symp. PIERS 2016-Proc
. (
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc
.,
2016
), pp.
883
886
.
7.
8.
W.
Gang
, in
IET Conf. Publ.
(
2009
).
9.
A.
Holub
and
M.
Polívka
, in
2008 14th Conf. Microw. Tech. Com.
2008
(
2008
).
10.
A.
Hoque
,
M.T.
Islam
, and
A.F.
Almutairi
,
Sensors
2020, Vol.
20
, Page 3323 20,
3323
(
2020
).
11.
L.
Jian-Ying
and
G.
Yeow-Beng
, in
IWAT 2005 IEEE Int. Work. Antenna Technol. Small Antennas Nov. Metamaterials, IWAT
2005 (
2005
), pp.
291
294
.
12.
D.
Kumar
,
T.
Moyra
, and
P.
Verma
, in
2017 8th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Netw. Technol. ICCCNT 2017
(
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc
.,
2017
).
13.
L. Kumar Yeddu Freelancer
Airoli
,
N.
Mumbai
, and
I.
Shireesha Yeddu
Assistant Professor
,
Int. J. Comput. Appl.
126
,
975
(
2015
).
14.
Y.
Liu
,
F.S.
Deng
,
H.Q.
Sun
,
W.
Zha
,
J.
Liu
, and
T.
Cao
, in
2018 Int. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. Symp. China, ACES-China 2018
(
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc
.,
2019
).
15.
Y.
Li
,
B.H.
Zeng
,
C.W.
Chen
,
D.C.
Chang
,
H.
Bin Liang
,
Z.
Li
,
J.
Liu
, and
G.
Lu
, in
2011 IEEE Int. Work. Antenna Technol. Small Antennas, Nov. Struct. Innov. Metamaterials
(
2011
), pp.
168
171
.
16.
A.W.
Memon
,
I.L.
de Paula
,
B.
Malengier
,
S.
Vasile
,
P.
Van Torre
, and
L.
Van Langenhove
,
Sensors 2021
, Vol.
21
, Page 1635 21,
1635
(
2021
).
17.
M.
Mohan
and
N.
Jagannathan
,
Oncol. Rev.
8
,
13
(
2014
).
18.
P.
Osklang
and
C.
Phongcharoenpanich
,
Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Eng.
26
,
466
(
2016
).
19.
R.L.
Powers
, in
1980 Antennas Propag. Soc. AP-S Int. Symp
. (
IEEE
,
1980
), pp.
105
108
.
20.
T.
Simpson
, in
Proc. 2012 IEEE Int. Symp. Antennas Propag.
(
2012
).
21.
N.M.
Sureshbabu
,
K.
Selvarasu
,
V. Jayanth
Kumar
,
M.
Nandakumar
, and
D.
Selvam
,
Case Rep. Dent.
2019, (
2019
).
22.
C.
Yu
,
W.
Hong
,
X.
Zhu
, and
Z.
Kuai
, in
2010 Int. Symp. Signals, Syst. Electron.
(
2010
), pp.
501
503
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.