This study describes higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics learning in System of Linear Equations in Two Variables materials at the junior high school. The method used in this writing is a literature study done by tracing various reference libraries in books and articles/journals. Based on the theories studied, skills concluded that higher order thinking skills (HOTS) are critical, creative, logical, reflective, and metacognitive thinking processes. HOTS in mathematics learning, especially in Two-variable linear equation systems’ content can be said to be still relatively low because students have difficulty making mathematical models for solving story problems in the Two-Variable Linear Equation System material, which requires high-level thinking skills and difficulty converting story problems into mathematical sentences or performing algebraic operations using elimination methods. In improving Higher-Order Thinking Skill (HOTS), required learning tools that included: Syllabus, Learning Implementation Plan, Teaching Materials, Learning Media, Student Worksheet, and Evaluation Instruments based on HOTS with the selection of effective learning strategies/models to improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) namely through a problem-based learning approach or known as the Problem-Based Learning model. The steps in problem-based learning consist of several phases, include (1) Student orientation on problems, (2) Organize students to learn, (3) Guide student inquiry, (4) Develop and present the work, and (5) Analyze and evaluate the breakdown process.

1.
E.
Inderasari
,
W.
Oktavia
,
T.
Agustina
,
Fajri
,
N.
,
Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa dan Sastra V
, Surakarta, 2019, edited by
C.
Ulya
(
Program Doktor Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Pascasarjana Kependidikan FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret
,
Surakarta
,
2019
), pp.
110
114
.
2.
Y. E.
Harususilo
,
Daftar Peringkat Kemampuan Matematika, Berapa Rapor Indonesia?
(
2019
), available at https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/12/07/09425411/skor-pisa-2018-daftar-peringkat-kemampuan-matematika-berapa-rapor-indonesia
3.
A.
Kamila
,
S.
Nafisah
,
D.
Aprilia
,
G. B.
Wicaksono
,
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika
, Pekalongan, 2020, edited by
E.
Kustriyono
,
D. A.
Fajar
,
A. C.
Dewanto
(
Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Pekalongan
,
Pekalongan
,
2020
), pp.
119
125
.
4.
M.
Agustarina
,
N.
Aisyah
,
E.
Kurniadi
, “
Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019)”
Atlantis Press
,
2020
)
5.
N.
Agustyaningrum
,
PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
,
4
,
39
46
(
2015
).
6.
A.
Budiman
and
Jailani
,
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
,
1
,
139
151
(
2014
).
7.
R.
Arifin
,
Math Didactic
,
2
,
154
163
(
2016
).
8.
R. F.
Pasandaran
and
D. M. R.
Kartika
,
Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
,
4
,
53
62
(
2019
).
9.
S.
Musfiqi
and
Jailani
,
PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
,
9
,
45
59
(
2015
).
10.
R.
Badjeber
and
J. P.
Purwaningrum
,
Guru Tua: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
,
1
,
36
43
(
2018
).
11.
E.
Susanto
and
H.
Retnawati
,
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika
,
3
,
189
197
(
2016
).
12.
R.
Syukur
, “
University of Islam Negeri Alauddin
,” (thesis,
Makasar
,
2017
).
13.
P. H. E.
Wibowo
,
Mathedunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
,
2
,
73
80
(
2016
).
14.
A. H.
Wahid
, and
R. A.
Karimah
,
Modeling Jurnal Program Studi PGMI
,
5
,
82
98
(
2018
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.