The emphasis on the objectives of learning mathematics in secondary schools is oriented to the PISA standard. The main obstacle experienced by teachers and students, especially in Bengkulu City schools, is the limited availability of problems for practice so that the achievement of the learning objectives required is not maximized. The availability of instruments presented by the OECD refers to problems that were not yet contextual for Bengkulu students. The purpose of this research was to construct PISA-based math problems with Tabot Bengkulu context that is valid and practical. The research was conducted referring to the Tesmer model with preliminary and formative evaluation. The study involved 12 respondents, namely eight grade students of middle school in Bengkulu City. The data collection instruments were in the form of validity sheets and practical questionnaires. Data were analyzed descriptively. The results of the study obtained is as many as 5 essay problems PISA based with the Tabot Bengkulu context that met the valid and quite practical criteria. The description of the results of the small-scale test showed that the reasoning abilities of students in the low category are 7 students (58.33%), 3 students were moderate (25.00%), and the high category was 2 students (16.67%).

1.
H. J.
Wilkens
,
IARTEM e-Journal
4
,
63
74
(
2011
).
2.
R.
Johar
,
Jurnal Peluang
1
,
30
41
(
2012
).
3.
S.
Wardhani
and
Rumiati
,
Modul matematika SMP program BERMUTU: instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS
(
PPPPTK Matematika
,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
2011
)
4.
OECD, PISA 2009
Results: Executive Summary
(
OECD
,
Paris, Perancis
,
2010
)
5.
OECD
,
Framework for the Assessment of Creative Thinking in PISA 2022: Third Draft
(
OECD
,
Paris, Perancis
,
2019
).
6.
I.
Pratiwi
,
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
4
,
51
71
(
2019
).
7.
N.
Mansur
,
PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika
, Semarang, 2017, edited by
I.
Rosyida
et al (
UNNES
,
Semarang, Indonesia
,
2018
), Vol
1
, p.
140
.
8.
K.
Stacey
,
The PISA view of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia
.
Journal on Mathematics Education
2
,
95
126
(
2011
).
9.
S.
Wardani
,
Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Aspek Pemahaman Konsep, Penalaran dan Komunikasi, Pemecahan Masalah
(
PPPG Mathematics
,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
,
2015
).
10.
S.
Haji
,
Y.
Yumiati
, and
Z.
Zamzaili
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia
3
,
177
183
(
2018
).
11.
K.
Kadir
,
Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Berbasis Potensi Palem untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik Siswa SMP
(
Lemlit Unhalu
,
Kendari
,
2012
).
12.
E.
Susanti
,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
10
,
1
22
(
2016
).
13.
R.
Richardo
,
Literasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
7
,
118
125
(
2016
).
14.
D. M.
Suwarma
,
Suatu Alternatif Pembelajaran Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Matematika
(
Maha Karya Cakrawala
,
Jakarta
,
2009
).
15.
M.
Tessmer
,
Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving The Quality of Education and Training
(
Kogan Page
,
London
,
1998
).
16.
L. R.
Aiken
,
Educational and Psychological Measurement
40
,
955
959
(
1980
).
17.
Z.
Zulkardi
and
R. I. I.
Putri
, Mendesain Sendiri Soal Kontekstual Matematika. In:
Prosiding KNM13. Konferensi Nasional Matematika ke-13
(
UNNES
,
Semarang, Indonesia
,
2006
).
18.
N.
Nieveen
,
Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training
(
ICO Cluwer Academic Publisher
,
Dordrecht
,
1999
).
19.
A. M.
Sroyer
,
J.
Nainggolan
, and
I. M.
Hutabarat
,
Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA
8
,
175
184
(
2018
).
20.
E.
Fajriyah
,
PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika
, Semarang, 2017, edited by
I.
Rosyida
et al (
UNNES
,
Semarang, Indonesia
,
2018
), Vol
1
, p.
114
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.