While on one hand wearing face masks can provide protection against infection from various viruses, on the other hand, it can have a negative effect on communication between people. Often reported is the reduced speech intelligibility, which is cause due to filtering effects of masks and reduced possibility of humans to read from lips. In this paper, besides the filtering effects, also the impact of mask/shield on the vocal effort of people is investigated. First experiments involved two main scenarios in which the filtering effect was observed and evaluated: (1) assessment of speech signal transmitted through conventional masks, based on experiments on people; (2) analysis of the sound signal produced by home-made artificial head. Later, the effect of the increased speech effort due to face mask was investigated by means of vibrometry measurement using an accelerometer placed at the suprasternal notch. The obtained data confirmed that the speech effort of the speaker is influenced by the attenuated perception of speech by speaker caused by the facemask. While the speech attenuation caused by facemask is partly dependent on the shape of the face and facial movements caused by the articulation effort, the impact on the attenuation perception is also rather individual.

1.
X.
Yu
and
R.
Yang
,
COVID-19 transmission through asymptomatic carriers is a challenge to containment
.
Influenza Respir. Viruses
14
,
474
475
(
2020
).
2.
A. J.
Kucharski
et al,
Lancet Infect. Dis.
20
,
553
558
(
2020
).
3.
WHO
.
Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020
. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-oncovid-19 11-march-2020 (accessed on 12 March 2020).
4.
Public Health Authority of The Slovak Republic; OLP/4084/2020.
Available online: https://www.uvzsr.sk/docs/info/covid19/Opatrenie_UVZ_SR_o_zakaze_a_obmedzeni_prevadzok_15032020.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2020). (in Slovak)
6.
A. J.
Palmiero
et al,
J. Occup. Environ. Hyg.
13
,
960
968
(
2016
).
7.
V.
Chmelík
et al,
Applied Sciences
11
,
4829
(
2021
).
8.
D.
Urbán
,
AIP Conference Proceedings
2429
,
020041
(
2021
). DOI:
9.
S. R.
Atcherson
et al,
J. Am. Acad. Audiol.
28
,
58
67
(
2017
).
10.
A.
Goldin
et al,
Hear. Rev.
27
,
8
9
(
2020
).
11.
R. M.
Corey
et al,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
148
,
2371
2375
(
2020
).
12.
M.
Magee
et al,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
148
,
3562
(
2020
).
13.
Z. S.
Bond
et al,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
85
,
907
912
(
1989
).
14.
A. J.
Palmiero
et al,
J. Occup. Environ. Hyg.
13
,
960
968
(
2016
).
15.
A.
Goldin
et al,
Hear. Rev.
27
,
8
9
(
2020
).
16.
W. H.
Sumby
and
I.
Pollack
,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
26
,
212
215
(
1954
).
17.
N. P.
Erber
,
J. Speech Hear. Disord.
40
,
481
492
(
1975
).
18.
V. S.
McKenna
et al,
The Laryngoscope
132
,
391
397
(
2022
).
19.
S. M.
Lulich
and
R. R.
Patel
,
Proc. Interspeech
2021
,
1404
1408
(
2021
).
20.
D.
Duadi
et al,
Opt. Express
28
,
20040
20050
(
2020
).
21.
A.
Chan
et al,
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
133
,
1667
1676
(
2013
).
22.
Y.
Avargel
and
I.
Cohen
, “Speech measurements using a laser Doppler vibrometer sensor: Application to speech enhancement,” in
2011 Joint Workshop on Hands-free Speech Communication and Microphone Arrays
(
IEEE
,
2011
), pp.
109
114
.
23.
L.
Zelem
et al, “
Transformation of office space to laboratory listening room
,” in
Euroregio BNAM 2022 Conference Proceedings (EAA, NAA& DAS, CC-BY-NC-ND
,
2022
), pp.
357
364
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.