The devastating effects of the COVID-19 global pandemic has forced most business transactions to shift from the conventional approach to the online medium to ensure their sustainability during this critical period. Artists are also transforming their approach from physical exhibitions to virtual exhibitions to ensure their business sustainability. Conventional or physical exhibitions draw large audiences; however, due to the COVID-19 global pandemic, such gatherings are strictly prohibited. Thus, virtual museum exhibitions will continue to be organised in the future, therefore, knowledge about factors that affect virtual exhibitions will be in demand. This review paper intended to examine the predictors that influence viewers' satisfaction in Virtual Art Exhibition. A comprehensive literature survey was carried out from March to May 2021 and the reviews reveal that there are three factors that possibly influence viewers’ satisfaction, which are the technology, aesthetic value, and individual factors. This review study has outlined the fundamental aspects that will serve as a guideline for artists by considering the technology, aesthetic value and individual factors in preparing for future virtual exhibitions as well as in improving viewers’ satisfaction.

1.
S.
Sylaiou
,
F.
Liarokapis
,
K.
Kotsakis
and
P.
Patias
,
Journal of Cultural Heritage
10
,
520
528
(
2009
)
2.
A.
Alawad
,
M.
Aljoufie
,
A.
Tiwari
and
L.
Daghestani
Beyond Geographical and Cultural Barriers: The Concept of a Virtual Gallery for Arts, Design & Architecture Schools in Saudi Arabia
.” (
Art and Design Review
,
2015
) pp.
87
93
.
3.
C. K.
Ramaiah
,
Journal of Library and Information Technology
34
,
83
86
(
2014
).
4.
P.
Miller
and
J.
Richards
, “
The good, the bad, and the downright misleading: archaelogical adoption of computer visualization
. In:
J.
Hugget
,
N.
Ryan
(Eds.)” (
Proceedings of the CAA 1995 Conference, Oxford, U.K., Tempus Reparatum, BAR Internation Series
600
,
1995
), pp.
19
22
5.
N.
Rahim
,
T. S. M. T.
Wook
,
N. A. M.
Zin
,
N. A.
Rawi
and
R.
Muda
,
Advanced Science Letters
,
22
2780
2784
(
2016
).
6.
H.
Rosli
and
N.
Kamaruddin
,
International Journal of Scientific Research
7
,
245
248
(
2020
).
7.
A.
Cline
, “
The Evolving Role of the Exhibition and its Impact on Art and Culture
” (
Trinity College Digital Repository
,
2012
).
8.
S. W.
Ju
,
International Journal of Business Policy and Strategy Management
7
,
31
38
(
2020
).
9.
B.
Stvilia
,
L.
Gasser
,
M. B.
Twidale
and
L. C.
Smith
,
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
58
,
1720
1733
(
2007
).
10.
C.
Lin
,
S.
Chen
,
R.
Lin
(
Applied sciences Efficacy of Virtual Reality in Painting Art Exhibitions Appreciation
,
2020
), pp
1
15
.
11.
Nur Afni Binti
Halil
,
Hashima Mohaini
Mohammad
,
Nor Ez-zatul Hanani Binti
Rosli
and
Audrey Anak
john
.
Ideology
3
,
41
53
(
2018
).
12.
A.
Hafiez
,
A.
Hasaballah
,
M.
Salih
and
Y.
Ali
,
Asian Business Review
5
,
119
126
(
2014
).
13.
S.
Foo
,
Journal of Library & Information Technology
28
,
22
34
(
2008
).
14.
M.
Samdanis
, “
The impact of new technology on art
” (
SAE Technical Papers
,
2016
).
15.
F. A. W.
Yan
(
2006
) “
Application of virtual technology in the exhibition - Of virtual exhibition
” (
International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, 2006
), pp
1
4
.
16.
C. G.
Ramachandra
and
T. R.
Srinivas
, “
Acceptance and usage of management information system in small scale and medium to large scale industries
” (
IEEE-International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management
,
2012
), pp
31
35
.
17.
N.
Omale
,
W. C.
Hung
,
L.
Luetkehans
and
J.
Cooke-Plagwitz
,
British Journal of Educational Technology 40
,
480
495
(
2009
).
18.
G.
Dumitrescu
,
C.
Lepadatu
and
C.
Ciurea
,
Informatica Economica
18
,
102
110
(
2014
).
19.
V.
Dziekan
, “
Virtuality and the Art of Exhibition
” (
Chicago
:
The University of Chicago Press
,
2012
).
20.
Syed Ahmad
Jamal
Rupa dan jiwa
” (
Kuala Lumpur
:
Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
,
1992
).
21.
Werhane
and
H.
Patricia
Philosophical Issues in Art
” (
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
:
Prentice-Hall
,
1984
).
22.
Haziyah
Hussin
,
Salmah Abu
Mansor
,
Rahilah
Omar
and
A. H. Hapsah
Ismail
,
Jurnal Pengajian Melayu
,
20
,
82
98
(
2009
).
23.
C. K. W.
Piero
, “
Aesthetics, Art and Creativity to Understand Creativity
” (
Publications. Istanbul
,
2013
).
24.
R. A.
Widjono
, “
Analysis of User Experience in Virtual Art Exhibition During Pandemic
” (
International Conference of Innovation in Media and Visual Design
,
2020
), pp.
93
99
.
25.
S.
Kim
, “
Virtual exhibitions and communication factors
” (
Museum Management and Curatorship
,
2018
), pp.
243
260
.
26.
J. A.
Castañeda
,
F.
Muñoz-Leiva
and
T.
Luque
,
Information and Management
44
,
384
396
(
2007
).
27.
Y.
Zhang
,
Y.
Fang
,
K. K.
Wei
,
E.
Ramsey
,
P.
McCole
and
H.
Chen
,
Information and Management
48
,
192
200
(
2011
).
28.
C. L.
Lin
,
S. J.
Chen
and
R.
Lin
,
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
10
,
1
15
(
2020
).
29.
H. T.
Chong
,
C. K.
Lim
and
K. L.
Tan
,
TEST Engineering & Management
,
82
,
6429
6436
(
2020
).
30.
S.
Yu
, (
2010
) “
Study on artistic characteristics of virtual exhibition
” (
International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, CAID and CD, 2010
), pp.
1163
1167
.
31.
M. B.
Carmo
and
A. P.
Cláudio
,
Journal of Library and Information Technology
33
,
222
235
(
2013
).
32.
Y.
Hu
,
W.
Sun
,
X.
Liu
,
Q.
Gan
and
J.
Shi
,
Tourism Demonstration System
38
,
267
381
(
2020
).
33.
M. T. K.
Chan
,
R.
Gorbet
,
P.
Beesley
and
D.
Kulic
, “
Interacting with curious agents: User experience with interactive sculptural systems
” (
International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN
,
2016
), pp.
151
158
.
34.
T. S.
Balint
and
A.
Hall
,
Acta Astronautica
110
,
129
144
(
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.