Electric power is an expensive and scarce resource and the concept of modern life is not possible without the continuous uninterrupted supply of it. Therefore, a lot of efforts have been made in past to conserve and optimize the use of electric power so that it could be efficiently distributed to all consumers. The efforts to conserve the energy include government and other organizations’ sponsored awareness campaign for public to encourage them to use the best practices while the efforts for optimizing its use are led by the researchers and industries. The electrical appliances and equipment are developed in a way that optimize the use of energy. In this direction, one of the important inventions was the use of standby mode for the electrical appliances which is employed when the appliance is plugged-in but not in active use. The standby mode helps optimize electric power use yet it causes some power leakage. This study strives to forecast the appliances’ state (standby or running) in next minutes to prevent the power leakage during the standby mode: by accurately forecasting the standby burst the appliance could be put in off state during the forecasted burst duration. This work proposes a technique to model power consumption data and presents a comparative study of five different machine learning algorithms to study their suitability to forecast an appliance’s state and standby burst. The proposed approach achieved around 90 percent accuracy and very good indications over precision, recall and F1-Score for models built using Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP). The study focus is modelling technique and comparison of existing ML techniques using the proposed modelling technique. This leads to interesting paths for further studies including fine-tuning of one of the techniques, and setting up a better purpose-built data collection environment.

1.
Susanne
,
A.
, &
Hiroshi
,
F.
Energy-efficient algorithms for flow time minimization
ACM Transactions on Algorithms
,
3
(
4
) (
2007
).
2.
Jinsung
,
B.
,
Sunghoi
,
P.
,
Byeongkwan
,
K.
,
Insung
,
H.
, &
Sehyun
,
P.
Design and implementation of an intelligent energy saving system based on standby power reduction for a future zero-energy home environment
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
,
59
(
3
),
507
514
(
2013
).
3.
Khan
,
M.
,
Reyasudin
,
B. K.
,
Razali
,
J.
, &
Jagadeesh
,
P.
Multi-agent based distributed control architecture for microgrid energy management and optimization
.
Energy Conversion and Management
112
,
288
307
(
2016
).
4.
IEA
, “
IEA Online Data Services
International Energy Agency (IEA)
(
2013
).
5.
Yanyu
,
Z.
,
Peng
,
Z.
, &
Chuanzhi
,
Z.
Optimization algorithm for home energy management system based on artificial bee colony in smart grid
IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems, CYBER Proceeding
, pp.
734
740
, (
2015
)
6.
Arabali
,
A.
,
Ghofrani
,
M.
,
Etezadi-Amoli
,
M.
,
Fadali
,
A.
, &
Baghzouz
,
A.
«
Genetic-Algorithm-Based Optimization Approach for Energy Management
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
,
28
(
1
),
162
170
(
2013
).
7.
Jordan
,
M. I.
, &
Mitchell
,
T. M.
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Science
,
349
(
6245
),
255
(
2015
).
8.
Stankoski
,
S.
,
Kiprijanovska
,
I.
,
Ilievski
,
I.
,
Slobodan
,
J.
, &
Gjoreski
,
H.
Electrical Energy Consumption Prediction Using Machine Learning
Springer International Publishing
, pp.
72
82
, (
2019
).
9.
Sahu
,
S. K.
(
2009
) “
Trends and Patterns of Energy Consumption in India
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Trends
, 16774,
32
, (
2009
).
10.
Kelly
,
J.
, &
Knottenbelt
,
W.
The {UK-DALE} dataset, domestic appliance-level electricity demand and whole-house demand from five {UK} homes
Scientific Data
,
2
(
150007
), (
2015
).
11.
David
,
M.
,
Lina
,
S.
, &
Vladimir
,
S.
An electrical load measurements dataset of United Kingdom households from a two-year longitudinal study
Scientific Data
,
4
, (
2017
).
12.
Wright
,
R. E.
Logistic regression. In Reading and understanding multivariate statistics
American Psychological Association
, pp.
217
244
, (
1995
).
13.
Philip
H.
, S., &
Hans
,
H.
«
The decision tree classifier: design and potential
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics
,
15
(
3
), pp.
142
147
, (
1977
).
14.
Keerthi
,
S. S.
, &
Gilbert
,
E. G.
Convergence of a generalized SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design
Machine Learning
,
46
(
1–3
),
351
360
, (
2002
).
15.
Cover
,
T. M.
, &
Hart
,
P. E.
Nearest Neighbor Pattern Classification
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
,
13
(
1
), pp.
21
27
, (
1967
).
16.
Haykin
,
S.
Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
2nd edition
,
Prentice Hall
, (
1998
).
17.
Hossin
,
M.
, &
Sulaiman
,
M. N.
A Review on Evaluation Metrics for Data Classification Evaluations
International Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Management Process
,
5
(
2
), pp.
1
11
, (
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.