In the present work, a techno-economic investigation of an off-grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) comprising of Solar Photovoltaic Panels and Wind Turbines as main supply with Battery as back-up has been conducted for electrification of a grocery shop located at Majhitar area of Sikkim, India. RAMP software has been used to generate accurate demand data in a short period of time for the shop located in an unreliable electricity area. The generated load data has been simulated using HOMER PRO software on a minute-by-minute basis for determination of net present cost. It was observed that the PV-Battery based system came out to be the best system with an Levelized Cost of Energy of 0.273 US $/kWh while the Wind-Battery based system came out to be the worst system. None of the systems were found to be competitive to existing grid prices. However, it has been proposed that with subsidies or with further reduction in PV Panel prices the cost of PV-Battery systems may become competitive with grid prices in future.

1.
A.
Chauhan
and
R.P.
Saini
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
51
,
662
681
(
2015
).
2.
A.
Chauhan
and
R.P.
Saini
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
59
,
388
405
(
2016
)
3.
A.
Phadke
,
W.Y.
Park
and
N.
Abhyankar
.
Energy Pol.
132
,
1163
1175
(
2019
).
4.
Fighting energy poverty: Why reliable, affordable electricity is key to India’s economic growth
.
Financial Express
, available at https://www.financialexpress.com/economy/fighting-energy-poverty-why-reliable-affordable-electricity-is-key-to-indias-economic-growth/2146368.
5.
Sikkim: SDF asks Govt to address problem of frequent power cut
.
The North East Today
, available at https://thenortheasttoday.com/states/sikkim/sikkim-sdf-asks-govt-to-address-problem-of-frequent-power/cid2520039.htm
6.
T.
Chandy
,
J.K.
Rodney
,
R.J.
Petharam
and
P.
Shepherd
.
Mt. Res. Dev.
32
,
117
125
(
2012
).
7.
L.B.
Lerer
and
T.
Scudder
.
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
1
9
,
113
123
(
1999
).
8.
J.
Kirchherr
and
K.J.
Charles
.
The social impacts of dams: a new framework for scholarly analysis
.
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
60
,
99
114
(
2016
).
9.
P.
Bajpai P.
and
V.
Dash
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
16
,
2926
2939
(
2012
).
10.
A.H.
Fathima
and
K.
Palanisamy
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
45
,
431
446
(
2015
).
11.
S.
Goel
and
R.
Sharma
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
78
,
1378
1389
(
2017
).
12.
A.
Chauhan
and
R.P.
Saini
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
38
,
99
120
(
2014
).
13.
S.
Sinha
and
S.S.
Chandel
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev.
32
,
192
205
(
2014
).
14.
S.
Ferrari
,
F.
Zagarella
,
P.
Caputo
and
M.
Bonomolo
.
Energy
176
,
544
51
(
2019
).
15.
P.
Jr.
Tozzi
and
J.H.
Jo
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
80
,
390
98
(
2017
).
16.
S.
Bahramara
,
P.
Moghaddam
,
M.R.
Haghifam
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
62
,
609
620
(
2016
).
17.
A.
Baruah
,
M.
Basu
and
D.
Amuley
.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
135
,
110158
(
2021
)
18.
HOMER energy
. see https://www.homerenergy.com.
19.
E.
Hartvigsson
and
E.O.
Ahlgren
.
Energy Sustain. Dev.
43
,
186
195
(
2018
)
20.
F.
Lombardi
,
S.
Balderrama
,
S.
Quoilin
and
E.
Colombo
.
Energy.
177
,
433
444
(
2019
).
22.
Avant Garde Innovations
, available at https://avantgarde.energy.
23.
India Mart
, available at https://indiamart.com
This content is only available via PDF.
Published by AIP Publishing.
You do not currently have access to this content.