In order to grasp individuals’ thoughts on various issues or events on social media, it is necessary to recognise both literal and metaphorical interpretations of words and phrases. Scanning social media for sarcastic remarks and tweets has lately gotten a lot of attention, especially because dismissive comments inside the manner of tweets sometimes include positive terms that indicate bad or undesirable attributes. Sarcasm may be used for a variety of objectives, including criticism and ridicule, depending on the situation. Even this, though, might be difficult for the average person to notice. Inorder to improve automated sentiment analysis obtained from various social media platforms and microblogging sites, thesarcastic restructuring technique is quite beneficial. A sentiment analysis refers to the stated views and preferences of internet users belonging to a certain community, which are then grouped together for further study. We present a pattern-based technique to identifying sarcasm that makes use of Twitter data. We suggest four groups of characteristics, each of which contains a significant amount of particular snarky. We utilised them to differentiate between sarcastic and non-sarcastic tweets. In addition, we examine each of the suggested feature sets and analyses the extra cost classes associated with them. Our findings also revealed that the use of lexical, sensible, periodicity, and part-of-speech tagging may improve the performance of SVM, but the use of both lexical and personal characteristics can improve the performance of many other machine learning algorithms, according to our findings. This paper also addressed the major difficulties that earlier researchers have encountered when attempting to forecast sarcastic tweets. Future academics or machine learning developers may find this information beneficial in addressing the key challenges associated with categorizing sarcastic postings in social media in the future.

1.
Yi
Tay
,
Mondher
Bouazizi
and
Tomoaki
Otsuki (Ohtsuki)
, “
A Pattern-Based Approach For Sarcasm DetectionOn Twitter
” in August 24, 2016
2.
Yi
Tay†
,
Luu Anh
Tuan
,
Siu Cheung
Huiφ
,
JianSuδ
, “
Reasoning with Sarcasm by Reading In-between”
arXiv:1805.02856v1 [cs. CL] 8 May
2018
3.
Aditya
Joshi
,
Pushpak
Bhattacharyya
,
Mark J.
Carman
.
2018
, “Sarcasm Detection Using Incongruity withinTarget Text”, In:
Investigations in Computational Sarcasm”, Cognitive Systems Monographs
, vol
37
.
Springer
4.
T. Aditya
Joshi
,
Pushpak Bhatta
charyya
,
Mark J.
Carman
.
2018
, “Sarcasm Detection Using Contextual Incongruity. In: Investigations in Computational Sarcasm”,
Cognitive Systems Monographs
, vol
37
.
Springer
5.
Shubhadeep
Mukherjee
,
Dr. Pradip Kumar
Bala
, “
Sarcasm Detection in MicroblogsUsing Naïve Bayes and FuzzyClustering
” In
Proceedings of Technology in Society
,
2017
pages
19
27
6.
Nishant
Nikhil
,
Muktabh Mayank
Srivastava
, “
Binarizer at SemEval-2018 Task 3:Parsing dependency and deeplearning for irony detection
” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01112
7.
B.
Sriram
,
D.
Fuhry
,
E.
Demir
,
H.
Ferhatosmanoglu
, and
M.
Demirbas
, “
Short text classification in twitter to improve information filtering
,” in
Proc.33rd Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Develop. Inf. Retr
., Jul.
2010
.
8.
C. G.
Akcora
,
M. A.
Bayir
,
M.
Demirbas
, and
H.
Ferhatosmanoglu
, “
Identifying breakpoints in public opinion
,”in
Proc.1st Workshop Soc. Media Anal
., Jul.
2010
.
9.
M. W.
Berry
, Ed.,
Survey of Text Mining: Clustering, Classification, and Retrieval
.
New York, NY, USA
:
Springer-Verlag
,
2004
.
10.
B.
Pang
,
L.
Lillian
, and
V.
Shivakumar
, “
Thumbs up: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques
,” in
Proc. ACL Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Lang. Process.
, vol.
10
. Jul.
2002
11.
M.
Boia
,
B.
Faltings
,
C.-C.
Musat
, and
P.
Pu
, ``
A Is worth a thousand words: How people attach sentiment toemoticons and words in tweets, ’
in
Proc. Int. Conf. Soc. Comput
., Sep.
2013
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.