Copulas are useful tools for modeling the dependence structure between two or more variables especially in financial risk modeling. Copulas are becoming a quite flexible tool in modeling dependence among the components of bivariate and mul-tivariate vector, in particular to predict losses in insurance and finance. The study of long term memory elimination via copula in the context of portfolio opimization in not new in literature, for details, see [1] and the references cited therein. However, the search for an appropriate bivariate copula to address this issue has not been explored in terms of several desirable properties, such as, asymptotically independent, Tail-increasing and decreasing property; Markov property that are very important in analyzing fi-nancial data that are quite often spatial-temporal in nature. In this paper, we explore the applicability of two bivariate copula—one from the Archimedean class, namely the Frank copula; and the other from the Gumbel family of copula, namely the BB6 copula for modeling temporal dependence and dependence structure, using a real data from financial domain. We establish all such neces-sary desirable properties (in the appendix) of the two selected copula in connection of eliminating long term memory in portfolio optimization. On the aspect of portfolio optimization and elimination of long term memory and by utilizing a well-known dataset this article heavily draws on the paper by [1] but the major contribution and focus of this article is to provide a framework/layout for selecting an appropriate copula in terms of identifying certain desirable properties.

1.
F. M. H.
Mzoughi
, “
How can long memory in volatility be eliminated in portfolio optimization: An empirical evidence using copulas
,”
Journal of Quantitative Economics
11
.
2.
N.
Balakrishnan
and
C. D.
Lai
,
Continuous bivariate distributions
(
Springer Science & Business Media
,
2009
).
3.
H.
Joe
,
Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts
(
Chapman & Hall
,
New York
.,
1997
).
4.
R.
Nelsen
,
An Introduction to Copulas
,
2nd
ed. (
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.,
2006
).
5.
A.
Sklar
, “
Fonctions de rpartition à n dimensions et leurs marges
,”
Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris
8
,
229
231
(
1959
).
6.
D. J. R.
Ibragimov
and
J.
Walden
, “
Non-diversification traps in catastrophe insurance markets
,”
Review of Financial Studies
22
,
959
993
(2009a).
7.
C. W.
Granger
, “
Time series concepts for conditional distributions
,”
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
65
,
689
701
(
2003
).
8.
R. F. A.J.
McNeil
and
P.
Embrechts
,
Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques, tools
(
Princeton University Press
.,
2005
).
9.
G. L. R.
Ibragimov
, “
Copulas and long memory
,”
Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion
Paper No. 2160 (
2009
b).
10.
R.
Nelsen
,
An Introduction to Copulas
,
1st
ed. (
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
.,
1999
).
11.
A.
Sklar
, “
Random variables, joint distribution functions, and copulas
,”
Kybernetika (Prague)
9
,
449
460
(
1973
).
12.
E. M. C. W.
Granger
and
J.
Racine
, “
A dependence metric for possibly nonlinear processes
,”
Journal of Time Series Analysis
25
,
649
669
(
2004
).
13.
Copula based divergence measures and their use in image registration
(
2009
).
14.
S.
Bouzebda
and
A.
Keziou
,
Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods
39
,
1
20
(
2009
).
15.
S. C. S.
Nadarajah
,
E.
Afuecheta
, “
A compendium of copulas
,”
Statistica
77
,
279
328
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.