Subtractive manufacturing techniques like turning, milling, boring on hard to machine metal alloys like Titanium and Inconel not only require advanced tooling but also require optimization of process parameters. Performance comparison of textured and non-textured tools in turning of Inconel was already studied by many researchers previously. The present work is about the optimization of machining parameters in dry turning of Inconel 600 with dimple textured uncoated carbide inserts by considering cutting speed, feed rate and rake angle as process parameters. Surface roughness and Material removal rate were considered as response parameters. Texturing of inserts was done on plain carbide inserts with no chip breakers. Fiber laser was used to create these textures on the rake face as it is proved to create them more efficiently. Taguchi method was used to reduce the number of experiments. The results from the studies indicate that sequence of Cutting speed of 300 m/min, Feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev and Rake angle of -3° was found to achieve minimum surface roughness whereas highest Material removal rate was obtained with a sequence of Cutting speed of 300 m/min, Feed rate of 0.15 mm/rev and Rake angle of -3°. Results from Analysis of Variance indicate that Cutting speed has maximum influence on producing good surface finish with 53% contribution whereas feed rate has maximum influence in increasing the MRR with 80% contribution.

1.
R.
Singh
,
J.S.
Dureja
,
M.
Dogra
,
M.K.
Gupta
,
M.
Mia
and
Q.
Song
,
Tribology International
145
(
2020
)
2.
T. Uddin
Siddiqui
and
S. Kumar
Singh
,
Materials Today: Proceedings
41
,
863
869
(
2020
)
3.
D.
Chetan
,
J.
Sumit
,
D.
Manu
,
G.M.
Kumar
and
M.
Mia
,
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
volume
138
,
273
285
(
2019
)
4.
U.
Eckart
and
S.
Danny
,
Procedia CIRP
87
,
25
30
(
2020
)
5.
D. K.
Sarma
and
S. K.
Rajbongshi
,
Materials Today: Proceedings
28
,
9
10
(
2020
)
6.
M.A.
Khan
and
K.
Gupta
,
Materials Research: Express
,
Bristol
Vol.
7
,
2020
7.
M.
Singh
,
G.
Singh
and
A.
Jayant
,
Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences
, Vol.
27
, (
NISCAIR-CSIR
,
India
), pp,
776
782
, (
2020
)
8.
B.
Denkena
,
T.
Grove
,
A.
Krodel
and
L.
Ellersiek
,
Procedia CIRP
77
,
602
605
, (
2018
)
9.
J.A.
George
and
K.
Lokesha
,
SN Applied Sciences (Springer Nature Switzerland),
1133
1139
(
2020
)
10.
S.
Kosaraju
and
S.
Chandraker
,
ScienceDirect Materials Today: Proceedings
2
,
3388
3393
, (
2015
)
11.
D.
Grguras
and
F.
Pusavec
,
Materials Science Procedia CIRP
81
,
904
907
, (
2019
)
12.
S.K.
Mishra
,
S.
Ghosh
and
A.
Sivanandam
,
Precision Engineering
, Volume
56
,
370
385
(
2019
)
13.
D.
Vasumathy
and
A.
Meena
,
Wear
376-377
,
1747
1758
(
2017
)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.