This study was aimed to determine and compare the muscle activation of Romanian deadlift (RD) and Conventional deadlift (CD) exercise among trained men. Twenty (n=20) trained men (mean age=21.34±1.82 years old) were recruited to perform RD and CD with load at 80% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). Participants performed both RD and CD in a cross-sectional counterbalance study design to avoid bias. Data was recorded with electromyogram (EMG) device and was analyzed using one way repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) to indicate the significant differences in muscle activation between both deadlifts. Muscle activation of vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM) and bicep femoris (BF) were analyzed and compared between RD and CD. The result showed that during CD, the VL and VM muscle activity was significantly higher compared to the data recorded during performing RD. In contrast, BF muscle activity was found to be greater during performing RD compared to CD. Overall, the findings showed the CD exercises activated more vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscle while RD exercises activated more bicep femoris muscle. Therefore, this finding expresses as a piece of important knowledge for coaches to better understand the basic muscular activation during deadlift exercises.

1.
M. R.
Ramli
,
N.
Osman
,
N. F. A.
Malek
,
E. W. M.
Chan
and
A. M.
Nadzalan
,
The ground reaction force comparison between conventional deadlift and hacklift
,
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research
,
9
,
3
,
981
983
(
2020
).
2.
J.
Earl
,
R. J.
Schmitz
and
B.
Arnold
,
Activation of the VMO and VL during dynamic mini-squat exercises with and without isometric hip adduction
,
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
,
11
,
6
,
381
386
(
2001
).
3.
W. N.
Najiah
,
E. L. Y.
Lee
,
N. F. Abd
Malek
,
Z. Ab
Malik
,
E. W. M.
Chan
,
N.
Ghazali
and
A. M.
Nadzalan
, “
Relationship between leg dynamometer with squat and deadlift 1RM score among university athletes
,” (in
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
,
2021
),
1874
,
1
,
012089
.
4.
A. M.
Nadzalan
,
J. F. L.
Low
,
M. S.
Azzfar
,
N.
Shazana
,
E.
Waqqash
and
N. I.
Mohamad
,
The effects of resistance training with different focus attention on muscular strength: Application to teaching methods in physical conditioning class
,
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering
,
8
,
8
,
16
19
(
2019
).
5.
K. L.
Koderi
,
K.
Tan
,
M. S.
Azzfar
,
N. F. Abd
Malek
,
N. I.
Mohamad
and
A. M.
Nadzalan
, “
The effects of stance width on muscle activation and performance during Romanian deadlift exercise
,” (in
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
,
2020
),
1529
,
2
,
022026
.
6.
N. I.
Mohamad
,
N. F.
Kasim
and
A. M.
Nadzalan
,
Mechanical and metabolic effect of standardized load resistance training protocol on untrained participants
,
Sport Science
,
10
,
85
90
(
2018
).
7.
J.
Blanchard
,
J.
Berning
,
K.
Adams
and
M.
DeBeliso
,
Effects of the trap bar deadlift and leg press on adolescent male strength, power and speed
,
Journal of Physical Education Research
,
3
,
2
,
11
22
(
2016
).
8.
E. S.
Bezerra
,
R.
Simão
,
S. J.
Fleck
,
G.
Paz
,
M.
Maia
,
P. B.
Costa
and
J. C.
Serrão
,
Electromyographic activity of lower body muscles during the deadlift and still-legged deadlift
,
Journal of Exercise Physiology Online
,
16
,
3
,
30
39
(
2013
).
9.
R. F.
Escamilla
,
A. C.
Francisco
,
A. V.
Kayes
,
K. P.
Speer
and
C. T.
Moorman
3rd,
An electromyographic analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts
,
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
,
34
,
4
,
682
688
(
2002
).
10.
M.
Hales
,
Improving the deadlift: Understanding biomechanical constraints and physiological adaptations to resistance exercise
,
Strength & Conditioning Journal
,
32
,
4
,
44
51
(
2010
).
11.
R. F.
Escamilla
,
A. C.
Francisco
,
G. S.
Fleisig
,
S. W.
Barrentine
,
C. M.
Welch
,
A. V.
Kayes
and
J. R.
Andrews
,
Three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts
,
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
,
32
,
7
,
1265
1275
(
2000
).
12.
S.
Bird
and
B.
Barrington-Higgs
,
Exploring the deadlift
,
Strength & Conditioning Journal
,
32
,
3
,
46
51
(
2010
).
13.
M. K.
Zebis
,
J.
Skotte
,
C. H.
Andersen
,
P.
Mortensen
,
H. H.
Petersen
,
T. C.
Viskær
and
L. L.
Andersen
,
Kettlebell swing targets semitendinosus and supine leg curl targets biceps femoris: an EMG study with rehabilitation implications
,
British Journal of Sports Medicine
,
47
,
18
,
1192
1198
(
2013
).
14.
M. J.
McAllister
,
K. G.
Hammond
,
B. K.
Schilling
,
L. C.
Ferreria
,
J. P.
Reed
and
L. W.
Weiss
,
Muscle activation during various hamstring exercises
,
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
,
28
,
6
,
1573
1580
(
2014
).
15.
K. D.
Camara
,
J. W.
Coburn
,
D. D.
Dunnick
,
L. E.
Brown
,
A. J.
Galpin
and
P. B.
Costa
,
An examination of muscle activation and power characteristics while performing the deadlift exercise with straight and hexagonal barbells
,
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
,
30
,
5
,
1183
1188
, (
2016
).
16.
A.
Rainoldi
,
G.
Melchiorri
and
I.
Caruso
,
A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles
,
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
,
134
,
1
,
37
43
(
2004
).
17.
H. J.
Hermens
,
B.
Freriks
,
C.
Disselhorst-Klug
and
G.
Rau
,
Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures
,”
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
,
10
,
5
,
361
374
, (
2000
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.